集体创伤——斯里兰卡北部战争10年来的社会心理后果,一项混合方法研究

IF 2.6 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Umaharan Thamotharampillai , Ruwanthi Perera , Rajitha Wickremasinghe , Shehan Williams , Thedsanamoorthy Vijayasangar , Balasubramaniam Sivatharsan , Vanceline Hilbert , Daya Somasundaram
{"title":"集体创伤——斯里兰卡北部战争10年来的社会心理后果,一项混合方法研究","authors":"Umaharan Thamotharampillai ,&nbsp;Ruwanthi Perera ,&nbsp;Rajitha Wickremasinghe ,&nbsp;Shehan Williams ,&nbsp;Thedsanamoorthy Vijayasangar ,&nbsp;Balasubramaniam Sivatharsan ,&nbsp;Vanceline Hilbert ,&nbsp;Daya Somasundaram","doi":"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100457","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Individuals, families and communities in Sri Lanka, particularly in the North-East of Sri Lanka, have undergone 3 decades of war trauma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Mixed quantitative and qualitative methods with an integrated, holistic and inclusive approach using validated survey measures of trauma, collective distress and mental health, complemented by information from narratives, observations, key-informant interviews, focus group discussions and case studies were collected from the war-affected in 5 districts of Sri Lanka. Thick description was used to bring out the contours of collective trauma through exemplar quotes, summarized verbatims and collective themes.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>At the individual level, high levels of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (46.8 %), depression (57.1 %), anxiety (60.7 %), stress (50 %), somatization (40.2 %) and functional disability (36.4 %) were found. Individual level consequences were significantly higher in districts with high trauma as compared to those with low trauma burdens. Coping intensity was correlated with anxiety, stress, PTSD and somatization. At the family level, dysfunctional families had a higher proportion of members with suicidal thoughts, mental health issues, alcohol and drug abuse, poor income, lack of essential facilities and dissatisfaction with family life. At the community level, common problems reported were use of illicit drugs (86.2 %) and alcohol (84.5 %), family problems (36.4 %), unemployment (32 %) and financial problems (26.3 %). Study villages scored very low in structural social capital. Bonding social capital was used more indicating its use as a coping strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides evidence that trauma in a population can collectively affect the characteristics and dynamics of the group as a whole. The observed social capital and collective efficacy changes, dysfunctional family units, negative changes in the functional dynamics of the community, higher rates of coping efforts and high prevalence of individual level effects of trauma are manifestations of collective trauma.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":74861,"journal":{"name":"SSM. Mental health","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100457"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collective Trauma- Psychosocial consequences of war in northern Sri Lanka 10 years on, a mixed methods study\",\"authors\":\"Umaharan Thamotharampillai ,&nbsp;Ruwanthi Perera ,&nbsp;Rajitha Wickremasinghe ,&nbsp;Shehan Williams ,&nbsp;Thedsanamoorthy Vijayasangar ,&nbsp;Balasubramaniam Sivatharsan ,&nbsp;Vanceline Hilbert ,&nbsp;Daya Somasundaram\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssmmh.2025.100457\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Individuals, families and communities in Sri Lanka, particularly in the North-East of Sri Lanka, have undergone 3 decades of war trauma.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Mixed quantitative and qualitative methods with an integrated, holistic and inclusive approach using validated survey measures of trauma, collective distress and mental health, complemented by information from narratives, observations, key-informant interviews, focus group discussions and case studies were collected from the war-affected in 5 districts of Sri Lanka. Thick description was used to bring out the contours of collective trauma through exemplar quotes, summarized verbatims and collective themes.</div></div><div><h3>Main findings</h3><div>At the individual level, high levels of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (46.8 %), depression (57.1 %), anxiety (60.7 %), stress (50 %), somatization (40.2 %) and functional disability (36.4 %) were found. Individual level consequences were significantly higher in districts with high trauma as compared to those with low trauma burdens. Coping intensity was correlated with anxiety, stress, PTSD and somatization. At the family level, dysfunctional families had a higher proportion of members with suicidal thoughts, mental health issues, alcohol and drug abuse, poor income, lack of essential facilities and dissatisfaction with family life. At the community level, common problems reported were use of illicit drugs (86.2 %) and alcohol (84.5 %), family problems (36.4 %), unemployment (32 %) and financial problems (26.3 %). Study villages scored very low in structural social capital. Bonding social capital was used more indicating its use as a coping strategy.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>This study provides evidence that trauma in a population can collectively affect the characteristics and dynamics of the group as a whole. The observed social capital and collective efficacy changes, dysfunctional family units, negative changes in the functional dynamics of the community, higher rates of coping efforts and high prevalence of individual level effects of trauma are manifestations of collective trauma.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100457\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"SSM. Mental health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325000696\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SSM. Mental health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666560325000696","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

斯里兰卡的个人、家庭和社区,特别是斯里兰卡东北部的个人、家庭和社区,经历了30年的战争创伤。方法采用综合、整体和包容的方法,采用创伤、集体痛苦和精神健康的有效调查措施,并辅以叙述、观察、关键信息者访谈、焦点小组讨论和案例研究等资料,从斯里兰卡5个县的受战争影响的人那里收集定量和定性混合方法。厚厚的描述通过范例引用、逐字总结和集体主题来引出集体创伤的轮廓。主要发现在个体水平上,存在高水平的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)(46.8%)、抑郁(57.1%)、焦虑(60.7%)、压力(50%)、躯体化(40.2%)和功能障碍(36.4%)。与创伤负担低的地区相比,创伤高的地区的个体水平后果显著更高。应对强度与焦虑、压力、创伤后应激障碍和躯体化相关。在家庭一级,功能失调家庭中有自杀念头、精神健康问题、酗酒和吸毒、收入差、缺乏基本设施和对家庭生活不满的成员比例较高。在社区一级,报告的常见问题是使用非法药物(86.2%)和酗酒(84.5%)、家庭问题(36.4%)、失业(32%)和财务问题(26.3%)。研究村在结构性社会资本方面得分很低。结合性社会资本的使用较多,表明其作为应对策略的使用。结论:本研究提供了证据,表明一个群体中的创伤可以共同影响整个群体的特征和动态。集体创伤表现为社会资本和集体效能的变化、家庭单元的功能失调、社区功能动态的负向变化、更高的应对努力率和个体创伤效应的高发生率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collective Trauma- Psychosocial consequences of war in northern Sri Lanka 10 years on, a mixed methods study

Introduction

Individuals, families and communities in Sri Lanka, particularly in the North-East of Sri Lanka, have undergone 3 decades of war trauma.

Methods

Mixed quantitative and qualitative methods with an integrated, holistic and inclusive approach using validated survey measures of trauma, collective distress and mental health, complemented by information from narratives, observations, key-informant interviews, focus group discussions and case studies were collected from the war-affected in 5 districts of Sri Lanka. Thick description was used to bring out the contours of collective trauma through exemplar quotes, summarized verbatims and collective themes.

Main findings

At the individual level, high levels of Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD) (46.8 %), depression (57.1 %), anxiety (60.7 %), stress (50 %), somatization (40.2 %) and functional disability (36.4 %) were found. Individual level consequences were significantly higher in districts with high trauma as compared to those with low trauma burdens. Coping intensity was correlated with anxiety, stress, PTSD and somatization. At the family level, dysfunctional families had a higher proportion of members with suicidal thoughts, mental health issues, alcohol and drug abuse, poor income, lack of essential facilities and dissatisfaction with family life. At the community level, common problems reported were use of illicit drugs (86.2 %) and alcohol (84.5 %), family problems (36.4 %), unemployment (32 %) and financial problems (26.3 %). Study villages scored very low in structural social capital. Bonding social capital was used more indicating its use as a coping strategy.

Conclusion

This study provides evidence that trauma in a population can collectively affect the characteristics and dynamics of the group as a whole. The observed social capital and collective efficacy changes, dysfunctional family units, negative changes in the functional dynamics of the community, higher rates of coping efforts and high prevalence of individual level effects of trauma are manifestations of collective trauma.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
SSM. Mental health
SSM. Mental health Social Psychology, Health
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
118 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信