Aneeka Patel, Peter Ó Conghaile, Terry D. Humphries, Mark Paskevicius, Craig E. Buckley
{"title":"溶液中低浓度硼氢化钠的定量","authors":"Aneeka Patel, Peter Ó Conghaile, Terry D. Humphries, Mark Paskevicius, Craig E. Buckley","doi":"10.1016/j.nxener.2025.100364","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Sodium borohydride (NaBH<sub>4</sub>) has been identified as a potential solid-state hydrogen storage material for energy export due to its high gravimetric hydrogen content of ≈ 10.8 wt%. There is a strong need to accurately detect and quantify NaBH<sub>4</sub> in solution during synthesis, hydrolysis, and extraction processes, particularly at low concentrations (≤50 mM). Several studies report the formation of low concentrations of NaBH<sub>4</sub> in aqueous systems, however other researchers were unable to replicate these results. Unfortunately, some studies use indirect methods to confirm the presence of NaBH<sub>4</sub>. This is the first study to evaluate all major techniques in-house for sub-millimolar sodium borohydride quantification, assessing impurity effects and emphasizing the need for multiple analytical methods, including direct detection such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). We investigate various analytical techniques to determine the limits of detection for NaBH<sub>4</sub> in aqueous solutions and assess the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Titration and gas evolution have traditionally been used, but confirmation with complimentary direct techniques can prevent misidentification. Here Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), Raman and NMR spectroscopies were utilized, detecting concentrations as low as 256, 50 and 0.21 mM NaBH<sub>4</sub>, respectively. Furthermore, electrochemical sensing showed detection limits of 0.42 mM NaBH<sub>4</sub> for cyclic voltammetry (CV) and 0.18 mM NaBH<sub>4</sub> for square wave voltammetry (SWV).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":100957,"journal":{"name":"Next Energy","volume":"9 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantification of low concentrations of sodium borohydride in solution\",\"authors\":\"Aneeka Patel, Peter Ó Conghaile, Terry D. Humphries, Mark Paskevicius, Craig E. Buckley\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.nxener.2025.100364\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Sodium borohydride (NaBH<sub>4</sub>) has been identified as a potential solid-state hydrogen storage material for energy export due to its high gravimetric hydrogen content of ≈ 10.8 wt%. There is a strong need to accurately detect and quantify NaBH<sub>4</sub> in solution during synthesis, hydrolysis, and extraction processes, particularly at low concentrations (≤50 mM). Several studies report the formation of low concentrations of NaBH<sub>4</sub> in aqueous systems, however other researchers were unable to replicate these results. Unfortunately, some studies use indirect methods to confirm the presence of NaBH<sub>4</sub>. This is the first study to evaluate all major techniques in-house for sub-millimolar sodium borohydride quantification, assessing impurity effects and emphasizing the need for multiple analytical methods, including direct detection such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). We investigate various analytical techniques to determine the limits of detection for NaBH<sub>4</sub> in aqueous solutions and assess the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Titration and gas evolution have traditionally been used, but confirmation with complimentary direct techniques can prevent misidentification. Here Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), Raman and NMR spectroscopies were utilized, detecting concentrations as low as 256, 50 and 0.21 mM NaBH<sub>4</sub>, respectively. Furthermore, electrochemical sensing showed detection limits of 0.42 mM NaBH<sub>4</sub> for cyclic voltammetry (CV) and 0.18 mM NaBH<sub>4</sub> for square wave voltammetry (SWV).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100957,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Next Energy\",\"volume\":\"9 \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Next Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949821X25001279\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Next Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2949821X25001279","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
硼氢化钠(NaBH4)由于其高重量氢含量(≈10.8 wt%)已被确定为一种潜在的用于能源出口的固态储氢材料。在合成、水解和提取过程中,特别是在低浓度(≤50 mM)下,迫切需要准确检测和定量溶液中的NaBH4。一些研究报告了在水系统中形成低浓度的NaBH4,然而其他研究人员无法复制这些结果。不幸的是,一些研究使用间接方法来证实NaBH4的存在。这是第一个评估亚毫摩尔硼氢化钠定量的所有主要内部技术的研究,评估杂质影响,并强调多种分析方法的必要性,包括直接检测,如核磁共振(NMR)。我们研究了各种分析技术,以确定水溶液中NaBH4的检出限,并评估每种方法的优缺点。传统上使用滴定法和气体演化法,但用互补的直接技术进行确认可以防止误认。利用傅里叶变换红外光谱(FTIR)、拉曼光谱和核磁共振光谱,分别检测到浓度低至256、50和0.21 mM的NaBH4。此外,电化学传感的循环伏安法(CV)检测限为0.42 mM NaBH4,方波伏安法(SWV)检测限为0.18 mM NaBH4。
Quantification of low concentrations of sodium borohydride in solution
Sodium borohydride (NaBH4) has been identified as a potential solid-state hydrogen storage material for energy export due to its high gravimetric hydrogen content of ≈ 10.8 wt%. There is a strong need to accurately detect and quantify NaBH4 in solution during synthesis, hydrolysis, and extraction processes, particularly at low concentrations (≤50 mM). Several studies report the formation of low concentrations of NaBH4 in aqueous systems, however other researchers were unable to replicate these results. Unfortunately, some studies use indirect methods to confirm the presence of NaBH4. This is the first study to evaluate all major techniques in-house for sub-millimolar sodium borohydride quantification, assessing impurity effects and emphasizing the need for multiple analytical methods, including direct detection such as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). We investigate various analytical techniques to determine the limits of detection for NaBH4 in aqueous solutions and assess the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Titration and gas evolution have traditionally been used, but confirmation with complimentary direct techniques can prevent misidentification. Here Fourier transform infrared (FTIR), Raman and NMR spectroscopies were utilized, detecting concentrations as low as 256, 50 and 0.21 mM NaBH4, respectively. Furthermore, electrochemical sensing showed detection limits of 0.42 mM NaBH4 for cyclic voltammetry (CV) and 0.18 mM NaBH4 for square wave voltammetry (SWV).