{"title":"缓解量子Big-M问题","authors":"Edoardo Alessandroni, Sergi Ramos-Calderer, Ingo Roth, Emiliano Traversi, Leandro Aolita","doi":"10.1038/s41534-025-01067-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A major obstacle for quantum optimizers is the reformulation of constraints as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO). Current QUBO translators exaggerate the weight <i>M</i> of the penalty terms. Classically known as the “Big-<i>M</i>” problem, the issue becomes even more daunting for quantum solvers, since it affects the physical energy scale. We take a systematic, encompassing look at the quantum big-<i>M</i> problem, revealing NP-hardness in finding the optimal <i>M</i> and establishing bounds on the Hamiltonian spectral gap Δ as a function of the weight <i>M</i>, inversely related to the expected run-time of quantum solvers. We propose a practical translation algorithm, based on SDP relaxation, that outperforms previous methods in numerical benchmarks. Our algorithm gives values of Δ orders of magnitude greater, e.g. for portfolio optimization instances. Solving such instances with an adiabatic algorithm on 6-qubits of an IonQ device, we observe significant advantages in time to solution and average solution quality. Our findings are relevant to quantum and quantum-inspired solvers alike.</p>","PeriodicalId":19212,"journal":{"name":"npj Quantum Information","volume":"57 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alleviating the quantum Big-M problem\",\"authors\":\"Edoardo Alessandroni, Sergi Ramos-Calderer, Ingo Roth, Emiliano Traversi, Leandro Aolita\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41534-025-01067-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A major obstacle for quantum optimizers is the reformulation of constraints as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO). Current QUBO translators exaggerate the weight <i>M</i> of the penalty terms. Classically known as the “Big-<i>M</i>” problem, the issue becomes even more daunting for quantum solvers, since it affects the physical energy scale. We take a systematic, encompassing look at the quantum big-<i>M</i> problem, revealing NP-hardness in finding the optimal <i>M</i> and establishing bounds on the Hamiltonian spectral gap Δ as a function of the weight <i>M</i>, inversely related to the expected run-time of quantum solvers. We propose a practical translation algorithm, based on SDP relaxation, that outperforms previous methods in numerical benchmarks. Our algorithm gives values of Δ orders of magnitude greater, e.g. for portfolio optimization instances. Solving such instances with an adiabatic algorithm on 6-qubits of an IonQ device, we observe significant advantages in time to solution and average solution quality. Our findings are relevant to quantum and quantum-inspired solvers alike.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19212,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"npj Quantum Information\",\"volume\":\"57 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"npj Quantum Information\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-025-01067-0\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSICS, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"npj Quantum Information","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-025-01067-0","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PHYSICS, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
A major obstacle for quantum optimizers is the reformulation of constraints as a quadratic unconstrained binary optimization (QUBO). Current QUBO translators exaggerate the weight M of the penalty terms. Classically known as the “Big-M” problem, the issue becomes even more daunting for quantum solvers, since it affects the physical energy scale. We take a systematic, encompassing look at the quantum big-M problem, revealing NP-hardness in finding the optimal M and establishing bounds on the Hamiltonian spectral gap Δ as a function of the weight M, inversely related to the expected run-time of quantum solvers. We propose a practical translation algorithm, based on SDP relaxation, that outperforms previous methods in numerical benchmarks. Our algorithm gives values of Δ orders of magnitude greater, e.g. for portfolio optimization instances. Solving such instances with an adiabatic algorithm on 6-qubits of an IonQ device, we observe significant advantages in time to solution and average solution quality. Our findings are relevant to quantum and quantum-inspired solvers alike.
期刊介绍:
The scope of npj Quantum Information spans across all relevant disciplines, fields, approaches and levels and so considers outstanding work ranging from fundamental research to applications and technologies.