25年的运动和运动心理学定性研究：进展如何？现在怎么办？

IF 3.3 2区心理学 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM

Psychology of Sport and Exercise Pub Date : 2025-07-23 DOI:10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102958

Brett Smith , Martin Roderick , Hester Hockin-Boyers , Javier Monforte , Toni Louise Williams , Patrick Jachyra , Caroline Dodd-Reynolds , Cassandra Phoenix

{"title":"25年的运动和运动心理学定性研究：进展如何？现在怎么办？","authors":"Brett Smith , Martin Roderick , Hester Hockin-Boyers , Javier Monforte , Toni Louise Williams , Patrick Jachyra , Caroline Dodd-Reynolds , Cassandra Phoenix","doi":"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology has grown over the last 25 years. The number of papers published in journals like <em>Psychology of Sport and Exercise</em> has increased. There has also been growth in terms of the variety and sophistication of work published. Such growth suggests qualitative research is in a good place. It is <em>and</em> it isn't. This paper aims to advance qualitative research and be a resource to guide future practice. It first celebrates qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology by offering examples of the positive qualities of work being done. The paper then highlights some problems by attending to the tokenistic engagement with epistemology and ontology plus some associated fallacies. Some thoughts about how qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology might develop are next offered. To help support the ongoing development of qualitative research we attend to interviewing, story completion, analysis, computer-assisted software, artificial intelligence (AI), and digital methods. The paper also provides a note on physical activity guidelines, qualitative research, and policy-making. It closes by reaffirming the need to approach qualitative research as a slow craft that involves people (not AI) making tough, well-thought-out ethical, theoretical, and methodological decisions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54536,"journal":{"name":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","volume":"81 ","pages":"Article 102958"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"25 years of qualitative research in sport and exercise Psychology: How did it Go? and what now?\",\"authors\":\"Brett Smith , Martin Roderick , Hester Hockin-Boyers , Javier Monforte , Toni Louise Williams , Patrick Jachyra , Caroline Dodd-Reynolds , Cassandra Phoenix\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.psychsport.2025.102958\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology has grown over the last 25 years. The number of papers published in journals like <em>Psychology of Sport and Exercise</em> has increased. There has also been growth in terms of the variety and sophistication of work published. Such growth suggests qualitative research is in a good place. It is <em>and</em> it isn't. This paper aims to advance qualitative research and be a resource to guide future practice. It first celebrates qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology by offering examples of the positive qualities of work being done. The paper then highlights some problems by attending to the tokenistic engagement with epistemology and ontology plus some associated fallacies. Some thoughts about how qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology might develop are next offered. To help support the ongoing development of qualitative research we attend to interviewing, story completion, analysis, computer-assisted software, artificial intelligence (AI), and digital methods. The paper also provides a note on physical activity guidelines, qualitative research, and policy-making. It closes by reaffirming the need to approach qualitative research as a slow craft that involves people (not AI) making tough, well-thought-out ethical, theoretical, and methodological decisions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54536,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"volume\":\"81 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102958\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology of Sport and Exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225001578\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology of Sport and Exercise","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1469029225001578","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的25年里，体育和运动心理学的定性研究得到了发展。在《运动心理学》和《运动》等期刊上发表的论文数量有所增加。在出版的作品的多样性和复杂性方面也有所增长。这样的增长表明定性研究处于有利地位。它是，它不是。本文旨在推动定性研究，并为指导未来的实践提供资源。它首先通过提供正在完成的工作的积极品质的例子来庆祝体育和运动心理学的定性研究。然后，本文通过关注符号论与认识论和本体论的接触以及一些相关的谬论来强调一些问题。接下来提出了一些关于运动和运动心理学定性研究如何发展的想法。为了支持定性研究的持续发展，我们关注访谈、故事完成、分析、计算机辅助软件、人工智能（AI）和数字方法。本文还提供了关于体育活动指南、定性研究和决策的说明。最后，它重申了将定性研究作为一种缓慢的工艺进行的必要性，这种工艺需要人们（而不是人工智能）做出艰难的、深思熟虑的伦理、理论和方法决定。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

25 years of qualitative research in sport and exercise Psychology: How did it Go? and what now?

Qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology has grown over the last 25 years. The number of papers published in journals like Psychology of Sport and Exercise has increased. There has also been growth in terms of the variety and sophistication of work published. Such growth suggests qualitative research is in a good place. It is and it isn't. This paper aims to advance qualitative research and be a resource to guide future practice. It first celebrates qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology by offering examples of the positive qualities of work being done. The paper then highlights some problems by attending to the tokenistic engagement with epistemology and ontology plus some associated fallacies. Some thoughts about how qualitative research in sport and exercise psychology might develop are next offered. To help support the ongoing development of qualitative research we attend to interviewing, story completion, analysis, computer-assisted software, artificial intelligence (AI), and digital methods. The paper also provides a note on physical activity guidelines, qualitative research, and policy-making. It closes by reaffirming the need to approach qualitative research as a slow craft that involves people (not AI) making tough, well-thought-out ethical, theoretical, and methodological decisions.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Psychology of Sport and Exercise 医学-心理学

CiteScore

6.40

自引率

5.90%

发文量

172

审稿时长

69 days

期刊介绍： Psychology of Sport and Exercise is an international forum for scholarly reports in the psychology of sport and exercise, broadly defined. The journal is open to the use of diverse methodological approaches. Manuscripts that will be considered for publication will present results from high quality empirical research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, commentaries concerning already published PSE papers or topics of general interest for PSE readers, protocol papers for trials, and reports of professional practice (which will need to demonstrate academic rigour and go beyond mere description). The CONSORT guidelines consort-statement need to be followed for protocol papers for trials; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the CONSORT checklist. For meta-analysis, the PRISMA prisma-statement guidelines should be followed; authors should present a flow diagramme and attach with their cover letter the PRISMA checklist. For systematic reviews it is recommended that the PRISMA guidelines are followed, although it is not compulsory. Authors interested in submitting replications of published studies need to contact the Editors-in-Chief before they start their replication. We are not interested in manuscripts that aim to test the psychometric properties of an existing scale from English to another language, unless new validation methods are used which address previously unanswered research questions.