Shuang-Shuang Li , Hong-Yu Yang , Bai-Xin Dong , Shi-Li Shu , Tian-Shu Liu , Feng Qiu , Qi-Chuan Jiang
{"title":"深入分析了高强度Al-Zn-Mg-Cu合金厚板搅拌摩擦焊接接头的组织和力学性能","authors":"Shuang-Shuang Li , Hong-Yu Yang , Bai-Xin Dong , Shi-Li Shu , Tian-Shu Liu , Feng Qiu , Qi-Chuan Jiang","doi":"10.1016/j.matchar.2025.115401","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study investigated the microstructure and mechanical performance of 8 mm-thick Al–Zn–Mg–Cu (AZMC) alloy joints fabricated by friction stir welding (FSW) under various combinations of tool rotational speeds (RSp, 400, 800, 1200 rpm) and welding speeds (WSp, 50, 100, 150 mm/min), both with and without post-weld heat treatment (PWHT). In the as-welded condition, both grain size and precipitate size in the nugget zone (NZ) increased with heat input, ranging from 1.46 μm and 0.27 μm to 2.45 μm and 0.73 μm, respectively. Meanwhile, the microhardness of NZ increased with both RSp (from 139.8 HV at 400 rpm to 152.1 HV at 1200 rpm) and WSp (from 132.8 HV at 50 mm/min to 140.2 HV at 150 mm/min), primarily due to the competition between grain boundary, precipitation, and solid solution strengthening mechanisms. PWHT induced abnormal grain growth (AGG) at low and medium heat input, which was suppressed under high heat input; the estimated Zener–Hollomon threshold for AGG was 4.7 × 10<sup>11</sup>–6.6 × 10<sup>11</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. The 1200 (RSp)–100 (WSp) condition delivered the best weld-direction (WD) performance (σ<sub>YS</sub> = 610 MPa, σ<sub>UTS</sub> = 662 MPa, δ<sub>EL</sub> = 9.5 %), reaching up to 97.9 % of base material (BM)’s properties, primarily due to the retention of ultrafine grains after PWHT. In the transverse direction (TD), 400–100 yielded the highest strength (σ<sub>YS</sub> = 591 MPa, σ<sub>UTS</sub> = 654 MPa; 94.0 % and 96.9 % of BM), while 400–150 showed the best ductility (δ<sub>EL</sub> = 10.2 %, 107.4 % of BM). The plasticity variation in the TD under different parameters is largely attributed to the uniformity and grain size differences between the NZ and TMAZ. These results highlight the critical role of optimized FSW parameters and PWHT in enhancing joint performance for high-strength thick Al alloys.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":18727,"journal":{"name":"Materials Characterization","volume":"228 ","pages":"Article 115401"},"PeriodicalIF":5.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In depth analysis of microstructure and mechanical properties of joints in thick plate friction stir welding of high–strength Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy\",\"authors\":\"Shuang-Shuang Li , Hong-Yu Yang , Bai-Xin Dong , Shi-Li Shu , Tian-Shu Liu , Feng Qiu , Qi-Chuan Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.matchar.2025.115401\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study investigated the microstructure and mechanical performance of 8 mm-thick Al–Zn–Mg–Cu (AZMC) alloy joints fabricated by friction stir welding (FSW) under various combinations of tool rotational speeds (RSp, 400, 800, 1200 rpm) and welding speeds (WSp, 50, 100, 150 mm/min), both with and without post-weld heat treatment (PWHT). In the as-welded condition, both grain size and precipitate size in the nugget zone (NZ) increased with heat input, ranging from 1.46 μm and 0.27 μm to 2.45 μm and 0.73 μm, respectively. Meanwhile, the microhardness of NZ increased with both RSp (from 139.8 HV at 400 rpm to 152.1 HV at 1200 rpm) and WSp (from 132.8 HV at 50 mm/min to 140.2 HV at 150 mm/min), primarily due to the competition between grain boundary, precipitation, and solid solution strengthening mechanisms. PWHT induced abnormal grain growth (AGG) at low and medium heat input, which was suppressed under high heat input; the estimated Zener–Hollomon threshold for AGG was 4.7 × 10<sup>11</sup>–6.6 × 10<sup>11</sup> s<sup>−1</sup>. The 1200 (RSp)–100 (WSp) condition delivered the best weld-direction (WD) performance (σ<sub>YS</sub> = 610 MPa, σ<sub>UTS</sub> = 662 MPa, δ<sub>EL</sub> = 9.5 %), reaching up to 97.9 % of base material (BM)’s properties, primarily due to the retention of ultrafine grains after PWHT. In the transverse direction (TD), 400–100 yielded the highest strength (σ<sub>YS</sub> = 591 MPa, σ<sub>UTS</sub> = 654 MPa; 94.0 % and 96.9 % of BM), while 400–150 showed the best ductility (δ<sub>EL</sub> = 10.2 %, 107.4 % of BM). The plasticity variation in the TD under different parameters is largely attributed to the uniformity and grain size differences between the NZ and TMAZ. These results highlight the critical role of optimized FSW parameters and PWHT in enhancing joint performance for high-strength thick Al alloys.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18727,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Materials Characterization\",\"volume\":\"228 \",\"pages\":\"Article 115401\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Materials Characterization\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044580325006904\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Materials Characterization","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1044580325006904","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, CHARACTERIZATION & TESTING","Score":null,"Total":0}
In depth analysis of microstructure and mechanical properties of joints in thick plate friction stir welding of high–strength Al–Zn–Mg–Cu alloy
This study investigated the microstructure and mechanical performance of 8 mm-thick Al–Zn–Mg–Cu (AZMC) alloy joints fabricated by friction stir welding (FSW) under various combinations of tool rotational speeds (RSp, 400, 800, 1200 rpm) and welding speeds (WSp, 50, 100, 150 mm/min), both with and without post-weld heat treatment (PWHT). In the as-welded condition, both grain size and precipitate size in the nugget zone (NZ) increased with heat input, ranging from 1.46 μm and 0.27 μm to 2.45 μm and 0.73 μm, respectively. Meanwhile, the microhardness of NZ increased with both RSp (from 139.8 HV at 400 rpm to 152.1 HV at 1200 rpm) and WSp (from 132.8 HV at 50 mm/min to 140.2 HV at 150 mm/min), primarily due to the competition between grain boundary, precipitation, and solid solution strengthening mechanisms. PWHT induced abnormal grain growth (AGG) at low and medium heat input, which was suppressed under high heat input; the estimated Zener–Hollomon threshold for AGG was 4.7 × 1011–6.6 × 1011 s−1. The 1200 (RSp)–100 (WSp) condition delivered the best weld-direction (WD) performance (σYS = 610 MPa, σUTS = 662 MPa, δEL = 9.5 %), reaching up to 97.9 % of base material (BM)’s properties, primarily due to the retention of ultrafine grains after PWHT. In the transverse direction (TD), 400–100 yielded the highest strength (σYS = 591 MPa, σUTS = 654 MPa; 94.0 % and 96.9 % of BM), while 400–150 showed the best ductility (δEL = 10.2 %, 107.4 % of BM). The plasticity variation in the TD under different parameters is largely attributed to the uniformity and grain size differences between the NZ and TMAZ. These results highlight the critical role of optimized FSW parameters and PWHT in enhancing joint performance for high-strength thick Al alloys.
期刊介绍:
Materials Characterization features original articles and state-of-the-art reviews on theoretical and practical aspects of the structure and behaviour of materials.
The Journal focuses on all characterization techniques, including all forms of microscopy (light, electron, acoustic, etc.,) and analysis (especially microanalysis and surface analytical techniques). Developments in both this wide range of techniques and their application to the quantification of the microstructure of materials are essential facets of the Journal.
The Journal provides the Materials Scientist/Engineer with up-to-date information on many types of materials with an underlying theme of explaining the behavior of materials using novel approaches. Materials covered by the journal include:
Metals & Alloys
Ceramics
Nanomaterials
Biomedical materials
Optical materials
Composites
Natural Materials.