马克思主义对循环经济的批判:从异化到生态文明

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Jacopo Nicola Bergamo , Michele Graziano Ceddia
{"title":"马克思主义对循环经济的批判:从异化到生态文明","authors":"Jacopo Nicola Bergamo ,&nbsp;Michele Graziano Ceddia","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Circular Economy (CE) represents a highly popular articulation of the environmental discourse and practice. It is loaded with expectations to achieving the necessary transition towards a sustainable development model. In this article, we begin by pointing to the constraints posed to the CE by the laws of thermodynamics. Subsequently, we discuss why, despite the thermodynamic critique, the environmental discourse and practice remains predominantly articulated around the CE. We chart an unexplored path by offering a critical reinterpretation of the concept of the CE drawing directly on Marx's <em>Capital</em>. By bringing to the foreground Marx's critique, it becomes possible to see how the CE is a specific capitalist articulation of the environmental discourse and practice. However, we argue that, within the boundaries set by the laws of thermodynamics, but free from capitalist relations of production, a different articulation of the environmental discourse and practice is possible. In this respect, the People's Republic of China is the most advanced ground for the development of such a new articulation, as it channels the animal spirits of capitalist competition towards the pursuit of social goals, originating a socialism with Chinese characteristics. This new possibility can be perceived in the gradual sublation of the CE discourse in China within the holistic concept of ecological civilisation (EC).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104230"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Marxist critique of Circular Economy: From alienation to ecological civilization\",\"authors\":\"Jacopo Nicola Bergamo ,&nbsp;Michele Graziano Ceddia\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Circular Economy (CE) represents a highly popular articulation of the environmental discourse and practice. It is loaded with expectations to achieving the necessary transition towards a sustainable development model. In this article, we begin by pointing to the constraints posed to the CE by the laws of thermodynamics. Subsequently, we discuss why, despite the thermodynamic critique, the environmental discourse and practice remains predominantly articulated around the CE. We chart an unexplored path by offering a critical reinterpretation of the concept of the CE drawing directly on Marx's <em>Capital</em>. By bringing to the foreground Marx's critique, it becomes possible to see how the CE is a specific capitalist articulation of the environmental discourse and practice. However, we argue that, within the boundaries set by the laws of thermodynamics, but free from capitalist relations of production, a different articulation of the environmental discourse and practice is possible. In this respect, the People's Republic of China is the most advanced ground for the development of such a new articulation, as it channels the animal spirits of capitalist competition towards the pursuit of social goals, originating a socialism with Chinese characteristics. This new possibility can be perceived in the gradual sublation of the CE discourse in China within the holistic concept of ecological civilisation (EC).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104230\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003111\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003111","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

循环经济(CE)代表了一种非常流行的环境话语和实践。它承载着实现向可持续发展模式的必要过渡的期望。在本文中,我们首先指出热力学定律对CE的约束。随后,我们讨论了为什么尽管存在热力学批评,环境话语和实践仍然主要围绕CE进行阐述。我们通过直接借鉴马克思的《资本论》,对CE的概念进行批判性的重新解释,绘制了一条未被探索的道路。通过把马克思的批判带进前台,我们就有可能看到CE如何成为环境话语和实践的特定资本主义表达。然而,我们认为,在热力学定律设定的边界内,但从资本主义生产关系中解放出来,环境话语和实践的不同表达是可能的。在这方面,中华人民共和国是发展这种新表述的最先进的地方,因为它将资本主义竞争的动物精神引向对社会目标的追求,开创了中国特色社会主义。这种新的可能性可以从生态文明的整体概念对中国生态文明话语的逐渐扬弃中看出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Marxist critique of Circular Economy: From alienation to ecological civilization
The Circular Economy (CE) represents a highly popular articulation of the environmental discourse and practice. It is loaded with expectations to achieving the necessary transition towards a sustainable development model. In this article, we begin by pointing to the constraints posed to the CE by the laws of thermodynamics. Subsequently, we discuss why, despite the thermodynamic critique, the environmental discourse and practice remains predominantly articulated around the CE. We chart an unexplored path by offering a critical reinterpretation of the concept of the CE drawing directly on Marx's Capital. By bringing to the foreground Marx's critique, it becomes possible to see how the CE is a specific capitalist articulation of the environmental discourse and practice. However, we argue that, within the boundaries set by the laws of thermodynamics, but free from capitalist relations of production, a different articulation of the environmental discourse and practice is possible. In this respect, the People's Republic of China is the most advanced ground for the development of such a new articulation, as it channels the animal spirits of capitalist competition towards the pursuit of social goals, originating a socialism with Chinese characteristics. This new possibility can be perceived in the gradual sublation of the CE discourse in China within the holistic concept of ecological civilisation (EC).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信