多环盆地对月球生产函数的贡献

IF 3 2区 物理与天体物理 Q2 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Astrid Oetting , Wajiha Iqbal , Nico Schmedemann , James W. Head , Gregory Michael , Harald Hiesinger , Carolyn H. van der Bogert , Thomas Heyer
{"title":"多环盆地对月球生产函数的贡献","authors":"Astrid Oetting ,&nbsp;Wajiha Iqbal ,&nbsp;Nico Schmedemann ,&nbsp;James W. Head ,&nbsp;Gregory Michael ,&nbsp;Harald Hiesinger ,&nbsp;Carolyn H. van der Bogert ,&nbsp;Thomas Heyer","doi":"10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116753","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Crater size-frequency distribution (CSFD) measurements provide a valuable tool for dating surfaces on terrestrial planetary bodies. In order to derive an age from CSFD measurements, a production function (PF) is required to reflect the size-frequency distribution of craters being formed. However, the most commonly used PFs are only valid to crater diameters up to 300 km. An expansion of the PFs would be beneficial to improve the understanding of the early bombardment history of the Moon. However, there are two main issues affecting the interpretation of the CSFDs of large and multi-ring basins: the determination of a standard main basin rim for multi-ring basins and the low number of large basins. Previously, numerous attempts have been made to define the representative diameters for (multi-ring) basins, which appear in many lunar catalogs. The comparison of four such lunar crater catalogs revealed significant differences in defining basin boundaries and diameters. Therefore, we created a new crater catalog for lunar craters larger than 100 km based on topographic and gravity data and using a consistent definition for basin diameters. We found that on the highlands, the CSFD measurement has not reached equilibrium. Given that the number of empirically measured basins is limited, this investigation naturally must deal with low-number statistics. However, the available data for basins &gt;300 km still allow an empirical analysis to provide insights into this poorly understood part of the lunar PF. We find that the shape of the CSFD is consistent with the impactor size-frequency distribution (SFD) of the Main Asteroid Belt, suggesting an origin from the Main Asteroid Belt. The presence of an additional impactor population cannot be observed in our data, although we cannot exclude the possibility of a second population with a similar SFD. Using the highland CSFD measurement as a reference, we found interesting large discrepancies between the measured and the calculated number of craters and basins on the lunar mare. For instance, we measured 30 craters and basins ≥100 km on mare, but expected 79 using the PF of Neukum et al. (2001). In addition, we identified 9 basins ≥300 km on mare areas, but expected only 5 basins when applying the PF of Neukum et al. (2001).</div></div>","PeriodicalId":13199,"journal":{"name":"Icarus","volume":"442 ","pages":"Article 116753"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Contribution of multi-ring basins to lunar production functions\",\"authors\":\"Astrid Oetting ,&nbsp;Wajiha Iqbal ,&nbsp;Nico Schmedemann ,&nbsp;James W. Head ,&nbsp;Gregory Michael ,&nbsp;Harald Hiesinger ,&nbsp;Carolyn H. van der Bogert ,&nbsp;Thomas Heyer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.icarus.2025.116753\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Crater size-frequency distribution (CSFD) measurements provide a valuable tool for dating surfaces on terrestrial planetary bodies. In order to derive an age from CSFD measurements, a production function (PF) is required to reflect the size-frequency distribution of craters being formed. However, the most commonly used PFs are only valid to crater diameters up to 300 km. An expansion of the PFs would be beneficial to improve the understanding of the early bombardment history of the Moon. However, there are two main issues affecting the interpretation of the CSFDs of large and multi-ring basins: the determination of a standard main basin rim for multi-ring basins and the low number of large basins. Previously, numerous attempts have been made to define the representative diameters for (multi-ring) basins, which appear in many lunar catalogs. The comparison of four such lunar crater catalogs revealed significant differences in defining basin boundaries and diameters. Therefore, we created a new crater catalog for lunar craters larger than 100 km based on topographic and gravity data and using a consistent definition for basin diameters. We found that on the highlands, the CSFD measurement has not reached equilibrium. Given that the number of empirically measured basins is limited, this investigation naturally must deal with low-number statistics. However, the available data for basins &gt;300 km still allow an empirical analysis to provide insights into this poorly understood part of the lunar PF. We find that the shape of the CSFD is consistent with the impactor size-frequency distribution (SFD) of the Main Asteroid Belt, suggesting an origin from the Main Asteroid Belt. The presence of an additional impactor population cannot be observed in our data, although we cannot exclude the possibility of a second population with a similar SFD. Using the highland CSFD measurement as a reference, we found interesting large discrepancies between the measured and the calculated number of craters and basins on the lunar mare. For instance, we measured 30 craters and basins ≥100 km on mare, but expected 79 using the PF of Neukum et al. (2001). In addition, we identified 9 basins ≥300 km on mare areas, but expected only 5 basins when applying the PF of Neukum et al. (2001).</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13199,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Icarus\",\"volume\":\"442 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116753\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Icarus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"101\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001910352500301X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icarus","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001910352500301X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

陨石坑大小-频率分布(CSFD)的测量为类地行星表面的测年提供了一个有价值的工具。为了从CSFD测量中得出年龄,需要一个生产函数(PF)来反映正在形成的陨石坑的尺寸-频率分布。然而,最常用的PFs只适用于直径不超过300公里的陨石坑。扩大PFs将有助于提高对月球早期轰击历史的理解。然而,影响大型和多环盆地csfd解释的主要问题有两个:多环盆地标准主盆地边缘的确定和大型盆地数量少。在此之前,已经进行了许多尝试来确定(多环)盆地的代表性直径,这些盆地出现在许多月球目录中。对四个这样的月球陨石坑目录的比较揭示了在定义盆地边界和直径方面的显著差异。因此,我们根据地形和重力数据,并使用一致的盆地直径定义,为大于100公里的月球陨石坑创建了一个新的陨石坑目录。我们发现,在高原上,CSFD测量没有达到平衡。鉴于经验性测量盆地的数量有限,这项调查自然必须处理低数量的统计数据。然而,300公里盆地的现有数据仍然允许进行经验分析,以深入了解月球PF的这一部分。我们发现CSFD的形状与主小行星带的撞击物尺寸-频率分布(SFD)一致,表明它起源于主小行星带。在我们的数据中没有观察到额外的撞击者群体的存在,尽管我们不能排除具有类似SFD的第二群体的可能性。使用高原CSFD测量作为参考,我们发现月球上的陨石坑和盆地的测量和计算数量之间存在有趣的巨大差异。例如,我们在mare上测量了30个≥100公里的陨石坑和盆地,但使用Neukum等人(2001)的PF预测了79个。此外,我们在沿海地区确定了9个≥300 km的盆地,但在应用Neukum等人(2001)的PF时,预计只有5个盆地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Contribution of multi-ring basins to lunar production functions
Crater size-frequency distribution (CSFD) measurements provide a valuable tool for dating surfaces on terrestrial planetary bodies. In order to derive an age from CSFD measurements, a production function (PF) is required to reflect the size-frequency distribution of craters being formed. However, the most commonly used PFs are only valid to crater diameters up to 300 km. An expansion of the PFs would be beneficial to improve the understanding of the early bombardment history of the Moon. However, there are two main issues affecting the interpretation of the CSFDs of large and multi-ring basins: the determination of a standard main basin rim for multi-ring basins and the low number of large basins. Previously, numerous attempts have been made to define the representative diameters for (multi-ring) basins, which appear in many lunar catalogs. The comparison of four such lunar crater catalogs revealed significant differences in defining basin boundaries and diameters. Therefore, we created a new crater catalog for lunar craters larger than 100 km based on topographic and gravity data and using a consistent definition for basin diameters. We found that on the highlands, the CSFD measurement has not reached equilibrium. Given that the number of empirically measured basins is limited, this investigation naturally must deal with low-number statistics. However, the available data for basins >300 km still allow an empirical analysis to provide insights into this poorly understood part of the lunar PF. We find that the shape of the CSFD is consistent with the impactor size-frequency distribution (SFD) of the Main Asteroid Belt, suggesting an origin from the Main Asteroid Belt. The presence of an additional impactor population cannot be observed in our data, although we cannot exclude the possibility of a second population with a similar SFD. Using the highland CSFD measurement as a reference, we found interesting large discrepancies between the measured and the calculated number of craters and basins on the lunar mare. For instance, we measured 30 craters and basins ≥100 km on mare, but expected 79 using the PF of Neukum et al. (2001). In addition, we identified 9 basins ≥300 km on mare areas, but expected only 5 basins when applying the PF of Neukum et al. (2001).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Icarus
Icarus 地学天文-天文与天体物理
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
18.80%
发文量
356
审稿时长
2-4 weeks
期刊介绍: Icarus is devoted to the publication of original contributions in the field of Solar System studies. Manuscripts reporting the results of new research - observational, experimental, or theoretical - concerning the astronomy, geology, meteorology, physics, chemistry, biology, and other scientific aspects of our Solar System or extrasolar systems are welcome. The journal generally does not publish papers devoted exclusively to the Sun, the Earth, celestial mechanics, meteoritics, or astrophysics. Icarus does not publish papers that provide "improved" versions of Bode''s law, or other numerical relations, without a sound physical basis. Icarus does not publish meeting announcements or general notices. Reviews, historical papers, and manuscripts describing spacecraft instrumentation may be considered, but only with prior approval of the editor. An entire issue of the journal is occasionally devoted to a single subject, usually arising from a conference on the same topic. The language of publication is English. American or British usage is accepted, but not a mixture of these.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信