Danielle Gavanescu, Annette Dobson, Hansa Sharma, Samuel X Tan, Nicholas M Muller, Maria Celia B Hughes, Maryrose K Malt, B Mark Smithers, Kiarash Khosrotehrani, Lena A von Schuckmann
{"title":"黑素瘤诊断阶段的社会人口统计学差异:社会经济地位和居住地点的作用。","authors":"Danielle Gavanescu, Annette Dobson, Hansa Sharma, Samuel X Tan, Nicholas M Muller, Maria Celia B Hughes, Maryrose K Malt, B Mark Smithers, Kiarash Khosrotehrani, Lena A von Schuckmann","doi":"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low tumour stage is associated with improved prognosis following diagnosis of primary melanoma. This study evaluated the associations between patient socioeconomic status (SES) and location of residence on tumour stage at melanoma diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a new diagnosis of histologically confirmed T1b-T4b melanoma in Queensland, Australia were recruited between 2010-2014. Logistic regression models were used to assess whether SES or location of residence were associated with lower (T1b-T3a) versus higher tumour stage (≥T3b).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 700 study participants with melanoma, those living in lower SES areas (n=358) had a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with ≥T3b-stage disease compared to patients in higher SES areas (n=342) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-2.62, P =0.03). Relative to patients living in urban areas (n=389), patients living in inner regional areas (n=209) were more likely to be diagnosed with a ≥T3b-stage melanoma (OR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.11-2.46; P = 0.01); however, this finding was not significant following adjustment for SES (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72-1.91; P = 0.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients residing in areas with lower average socioeconomic advantage were more frequently diagnosed with a locally advanced melanoma than patients in high SES areas. Geographical remoteness was not independently associated with tumour stage at diagnosis in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Our study highlights a disparity in early melanoma detection across socioeconomic classes. Population groups who are disproportionately more likely to be diagnosed with a thicker primary melanoma should be considered for targeted screening initiatives and healthcare accessibility programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":520580,"journal":{"name":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sociodemographic Disparities in Melanoma Stage at Diagnosis: The Role of Socioeconomic Status and Residential Location.\",\"authors\":\"Danielle Gavanescu, Annette Dobson, Hansa Sharma, Samuel X Tan, Nicholas M Muller, Maria Celia B Hughes, Maryrose K Malt, B Mark Smithers, Kiarash Khosrotehrani, Lena A von Schuckmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0372\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low tumour stage is associated with improved prognosis following diagnosis of primary melanoma. This study evaluated the associations between patient socioeconomic status (SES) and location of residence on tumour stage at melanoma diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients with a new diagnosis of histologically confirmed T1b-T4b melanoma in Queensland, Australia were recruited between 2010-2014. Logistic regression models were used to assess whether SES or location of residence were associated with lower (T1b-T3a) versus higher tumour stage (≥T3b).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 700 study participants with melanoma, those living in lower SES areas (n=358) had a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with ≥T3b-stage disease compared to patients in higher SES areas (n=342) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-2.62, P =0.03). Relative to patients living in urban areas (n=389), patients living in inner regional areas (n=209) were more likely to be diagnosed with a ≥T3b-stage melanoma (OR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.11-2.46; P = 0.01); however, this finding was not significant following adjustment for SES (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72-1.91; P = 0.53).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients residing in areas with lower average socioeconomic advantage were more frequently diagnosed with a locally advanced melanoma than patients in high SES areas. Geographical remoteness was not independently associated with tumour stage at diagnosis in this cohort.</p><p><strong>Impact: </strong>Our study highlights a disparity in early melanoma detection across socioeconomic classes. Population groups who are disproportionately more likely to be diagnosed with a thicker primary melanoma should be considered for targeted screening initiatives and healthcare accessibility programs.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0372\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer epidemiology, biomarkers & prevention : a publication of the American Association for Cancer Research, cosponsored by the American Society of Preventive Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-25-0372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:低肿瘤分期与原发性黑色素瘤诊断后预后改善相关。本研究评估了患者社会经济地位(SES)和居住地在黑色素瘤诊断时肿瘤分期之间的关系。方法:招募2010-2014年澳大利亚昆士兰州新诊断的组织学证实的T1b-T4b黑色素瘤患者。使用Logistic回归模型评估社会地位或居住地是否与较低(T1b-T3a)或较高肿瘤分期(≥T3b)相关。结果:在700名黑色素瘤患者中,生活在社会经济地位较低地区的患者(n=358)被诊断为≥t3b期疾病的可能性高于生活在社会经济地位较高地区的患者(n=342)(校正优势比[aOR] = 1.65, 95%可信区间[CI]: 1.04-2.62, P =0.03)。相对于居住在城市地区的患者(n=389),居住在内陆地区的患者(n=209)更有可能被诊断为≥t3b期黑色素瘤(OR = 1.65;95% ci: 1.11-2.46;P = 0.01);然而,在调整SES后,这一发现并不显著(aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72-1.91;P = 0.53)。结论:生活在平均社会经济优势较低地区的患者比生活在高社会经济地位地区的患者更容易被诊断为局部晚期黑色素瘤。在这个队列中,地理位置与诊断时的肿瘤分期没有独立的相关性。影响:我们的研究强调了不同社会经济阶层在黑色素瘤早期检测方面的差异。那些不成比例地更有可能被诊断为较厚的原发性黑色素瘤的人群应该被考虑进行有针对性的筛查和医疗保健可及性计划。
Sociodemographic Disparities in Melanoma Stage at Diagnosis: The Role of Socioeconomic Status and Residential Location.
Background: Low tumour stage is associated with improved prognosis following diagnosis of primary melanoma. This study evaluated the associations between patient socioeconomic status (SES) and location of residence on tumour stage at melanoma diagnosis.
Methods: Patients with a new diagnosis of histologically confirmed T1b-T4b melanoma in Queensland, Australia were recruited between 2010-2014. Logistic regression models were used to assess whether SES or location of residence were associated with lower (T1b-T3a) versus higher tumour stage (≥T3b).
Results: Of 700 study participants with melanoma, those living in lower SES areas (n=358) had a higher likelihood of being diagnosed with ≥T3b-stage disease compared to patients in higher SES areas (n=342) (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04-2.62, P =0.03). Relative to patients living in urban areas (n=389), patients living in inner regional areas (n=209) were more likely to be diagnosed with a ≥T3b-stage melanoma (OR = 1.65; 95% CI: 1.11-2.46; P = 0.01); however, this finding was not significant following adjustment for SES (aOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.72-1.91; P = 0.53).
Conclusions: Patients residing in areas with lower average socioeconomic advantage were more frequently diagnosed with a locally advanced melanoma than patients in high SES areas. Geographical remoteness was not independently associated with tumour stage at diagnosis in this cohort.
Impact: Our study highlights a disparity in early melanoma detection across socioeconomic classes. Population groups who are disproportionately more likely to be diagnosed with a thicker primary melanoma should be considered for targeted screening initiatives and healthcare accessibility programs.