25年的研究和监管:纳米技术商业化安全吗?

IF 4.6 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Frontiers in toxicology Pub Date : 2025-07-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/ftox.2025.1629813
Kirsten Rasmussen, Phil Sayre, Andrej Kobe, Mar Gonzalez, Hubert Rauscher
{"title":"25年的研究和监管:纳米技术商业化安全吗?","authors":"Kirsten Rasmussen, Phil Sayre, Andrej Kobe, Mar Gonzalez, Hubert Rauscher","doi":"10.3389/ftox.2025.1629813","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines the global communities' regulatory and scientific advancements in nanotechnology and nanomaterials since 2000. It explores some similarities and differences in nanomaterial safety compared to general chemical safety. The paper provides an overview of the encountered challenges and how far they have been resolved, as well as information on how different countries' legislators have addressed nanomaterials, including safety assessment in (new) legislation. Challenges arose due to the unique physico-chemical properties of some nanomaterials and included the lack of i) a regulatory definition, ii) applicable regulatory test methods, including methods for physico-chemical characterization and for ecotoxicological effects, as well as sample preparation and dosimetry, iii) assessment and modelling of human, especially occupational, and environmental exposure to nanomaterials, iv) quantification of nanomaterial in complex media, v) systems for collecting the data generated and ensuring FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable) and quality data, vi) reference nanomaterials, and vii) a frame for nanotechnology governance. The paper highlights the role of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in building a global, regulatory understanding of nanotechnology and nanomaterials, as well as the OECD's achievements of developing nano-specific test guidelines. The paper identifies areas, such as alternative test methods, availability of reference nanomaterials, comparable data and FAIR data, analytical tools for quantifying nanomaterials in (complex) matrices that are still under-addressed. It gives a wider perspective of Governance of Advanced Materials including nanomaterials, also illustrated by carbon nanotubes used in batteries for electric vehicles, to also aid their commercialization. In the EU, the policy context is moving towards a holistic governance approach embracing sustainability dimensions.</p>","PeriodicalId":73111,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in toxicology","volume":"7 ","pages":"1629813"},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286942/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"25 years of research and regulation: Is nanotechnology safe to commercialize?\",\"authors\":\"Kirsten Rasmussen, Phil Sayre, Andrej Kobe, Mar Gonzalez, Hubert Rauscher\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/ftox.2025.1629813\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>This paper examines the global communities' regulatory and scientific advancements in nanotechnology and nanomaterials since 2000. It explores some similarities and differences in nanomaterial safety compared to general chemical safety. The paper provides an overview of the encountered challenges and how far they have been resolved, as well as information on how different countries' legislators have addressed nanomaterials, including safety assessment in (new) legislation. Challenges arose due to the unique physico-chemical properties of some nanomaterials and included the lack of i) a regulatory definition, ii) applicable regulatory test methods, including methods for physico-chemical characterization and for ecotoxicological effects, as well as sample preparation and dosimetry, iii) assessment and modelling of human, especially occupational, and environmental exposure to nanomaterials, iv) quantification of nanomaterial in complex media, v) systems for collecting the data generated and ensuring FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable) and quality data, vi) reference nanomaterials, and vii) a frame for nanotechnology governance. The paper highlights the role of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in building a global, regulatory understanding of nanotechnology and nanomaterials, as well as the OECD's achievements of developing nano-specific test guidelines. The paper identifies areas, such as alternative test methods, availability of reference nanomaterials, comparable data and FAIR data, analytical tools for quantifying nanomaterials in (complex) matrices that are still under-addressed. It gives a wider perspective of Governance of Advanced Materials including nanomaterials, also illustrated by carbon nanotubes used in batteries for electric vehicles, to also aid their commercialization. In the EU, the policy context is moving towards a holistic governance approach embracing sustainability dimensions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73111,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"volume\":\"7 \",\"pages\":\"1629813\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286942/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2025.1629813\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TOXICOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/ftox.2025.1629813","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文考察了自2000年以来全球社区在纳米技术和纳米材料方面的监管和科学进展。它探讨了纳米材料安全与一般化学品安全的一些异同。这篇论文概述了所遇到的挑战以及它们已经得到了多大程度的解决,还提供了关于不同国家的立法者如何处理纳米材料的信息,包括(新)立法中的安全评估。由于某些纳米材料独特的物理化学特性,挑战出现了,包括缺乏i)监管定义,ii)适用的监管测试方法,包括物理化学表征和生态毒理学效应的方法,以及样品制备和剂量学,iii)人类,特别是职业和环境暴露于纳米材料的评估和建模,iv)复杂介质中纳米材料的量化,v)收集生成的数据并确保公平(可查找、可访问、可互操作和可重用)和高质量数据的系统,vi)参考纳米材料,以及vii)纳米技术治理框架。这篇论文强调了经济合作与发展组织(OECD)在建立对纳米技术和纳米材料的全球性、规范性理解方面的作用,以及OECD在制定纳米特异性测试指南方面的成就。这篇论文指出了一些领域,例如替代测试方法、参考纳米材料的可用性、可比较的数据和FAIR数据、用于在(复杂)矩阵中量化纳米材料的分析工具,这些领域仍然没有得到充分的解决。它为包括纳米材料在内的先进材料的治理提供了更广阔的视角,也以用于电动汽车电池的碳纳米管为例,以帮助其商业化。在欧盟,政策背景正在朝着包含可持续性维度的整体治理方法发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

25 years of research and regulation: Is nanotechnology safe to commercialize?

25 years of research and regulation: Is nanotechnology safe to commercialize?

25 years of research and regulation: Is nanotechnology safe to commercialize?

This paper examines the global communities' regulatory and scientific advancements in nanotechnology and nanomaterials since 2000. It explores some similarities and differences in nanomaterial safety compared to general chemical safety. The paper provides an overview of the encountered challenges and how far they have been resolved, as well as information on how different countries' legislators have addressed nanomaterials, including safety assessment in (new) legislation. Challenges arose due to the unique physico-chemical properties of some nanomaterials and included the lack of i) a regulatory definition, ii) applicable regulatory test methods, including methods for physico-chemical characterization and for ecotoxicological effects, as well as sample preparation and dosimetry, iii) assessment and modelling of human, especially occupational, and environmental exposure to nanomaterials, iv) quantification of nanomaterial in complex media, v) systems for collecting the data generated and ensuring FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable and Re-usable) and quality data, vi) reference nanomaterials, and vii) a frame for nanotechnology governance. The paper highlights the role of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) in building a global, regulatory understanding of nanotechnology and nanomaterials, as well as the OECD's achievements of developing nano-specific test guidelines. The paper identifies areas, such as alternative test methods, availability of reference nanomaterials, comparable data and FAIR data, analytical tools for quantifying nanomaterials in (complex) matrices that are still under-addressed. It gives a wider perspective of Governance of Advanced Materials including nanomaterials, also illustrated by carbon nanotubes used in batteries for electric vehicles, to also aid their commercialization. In the EU, the policy context is moving towards a holistic governance approach embracing sustainability dimensions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信