简单的跨模式对应对口头意图解释的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
John McEwan, Ada Kritikos, Mick Zeljko
{"title":"简单的跨模式对应对口头意图解释的影响。","authors":"John McEwan, Ada Kritikos, Mick Zeljko","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03129-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Crossmodal correspondences (CMCs) are consistent associations between sensory features from different modalities. Previous research has demonstrated that these pairings can be recruited in the resolution of the Rubin face-vase illusion. This research builds upon and expands these findings into the resolution of language ambiguity. The study uses the feature pairings of elevation/pitch, lightness/pitch, and size/pitch to influence the perceived intonation of a spoken utterance. Participants listened to a range of auditory stimuli, varying in their intent, and attempted to classify them as questions or statements. We found that change in the irrelevant visual features of elevation or lightness could bias their judgements in a manner consistent with an actual change in the pitch of the auditory stimulus. Size/pitch does not appear to affect language judgements, and we confirm this in a series of follow-up experiments. This suggests that simple crossmodal correspondences can influence high-level ambiguity resolution, at least in some cases. These findings have important implications for the use of visual cues in audiovisual language studies such as the visual world paradigm.</p>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of simple crossmodal correspondence on interpretation of spoken intent.\",\"authors\":\"John McEwan, Ada Kritikos, Mick Zeljko\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13414-025-03129-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Crossmodal correspondences (CMCs) are consistent associations between sensory features from different modalities. Previous research has demonstrated that these pairings can be recruited in the resolution of the Rubin face-vase illusion. This research builds upon and expands these findings into the resolution of language ambiguity. The study uses the feature pairings of elevation/pitch, lightness/pitch, and size/pitch to influence the perceived intonation of a spoken utterance. Participants listened to a range of auditory stimuli, varying in their intent, and attempted to classify them as questions or statements. We found that change in the irrelevant visual features of elevation or lightness could bias their judgements in a manner consistent with an actual change in the pitch of the auditory stimulus. Size/pitch does not appear to affect language judgements, and we confirm this in a series of follow-up experiments. This suggests that simple crossmodal correspondences can influence high-level ambiguity resolution, at least in some cases. These findings have important implications for the use of visual cues in audiovisual language studies such as the visual world paradigm.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03129-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03129-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跨模态对应(cmc)是不同模态的感觉特征之间的一致关联。先前的研究表明,这些配对可以在鲁宾脸花瓶错觉的分辨率中被吸收。本研究以这些发现为基础,并将其扩展到语言歧义的解决。该研究使用了音高/音高、亮度/音高和大小/音高的特征配对来影响语音的语调感知。参与者听了一系列意图各异的听觉刺激,并试图将其归类为问题或陈述。我们发现,高度或亮度等不相关的视觉特征的变化会使他们的判断产生偏差,这种偏差与听觉刺激的音高的实际变化是一致的。尺寸/音高似乎不会影响语言判断,我们在后续的一系列实验中证实了这一点。这表明,至少在某些情况下,简单的跨模式对应可以影响高层次的歧义解决。这些发现对于视觉世界范式等视听语言研究中视觉线索的使用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Influence of simple crossmodal correspondence on interpretation of spoken intent.

Crossmodal correspondences (CMCs) are consistent associations between sensory features from different modalities. Previous research has demonstrated that these pairings can be recruited in the resolution of the Rubin face-vase illusion. This research builds upon and expands these findings into the resolution of language ambiguity. The study uses the feature pairings of elevation/pitch, lightness/pitch, and size/pitch to influence the perceived intonation of a spoken utterance. Participants listened to a range of auditory stimuli, varying in their intent, and attempted to classify them as questions or statements. We found that change in the irrelevant visual features of elevation or lightness could bias their judgements in a manner consistent with an actual change in the pitch of the auditory stimulus. Size/pitch does not appear to affect language judgements, and we confirm this in a series of follow-up experiments. This suggests that simple crossmodal correspondences can influence high-level ambiguity resolution, at least in some cases. These findings have important implications for the use of visual cues in audiovisual language studies such as the visual world paradigm.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信