“听觉”时间和“视觉”时间真的感觉一样吗?刺激方式对持续时间和时间流逝判断的影响。

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY
Daniel Bratzke
{"title":"“听觉”时间和“视觉”时间真的感觉一样吗?刺激方式对持续时间和时间流逝判断的影响。","authors":"Daniel Bratzke","doi":"10.3758/s13414-025-03131-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The present study investigated the previous claim that auditory stimuli appear to last longer than visual ones, but that the modality has no influence on the experience of the passage of time (POT). Participants judged the duration, the POT, and the phenomenal quality of the two temporal experiences after hearing a tone or viewing a blue square with a duration between 200 ms and 5 s. The results showed modality effects on both duration and POT judgements, with longer duration and slower POT judgements for auditory than for visual stimuli. Judgements of phenomenal quality showed large interindividual differences, with most participants showing positive but some also negative relationships with target duration for both qualities. Importantly, duration and POT judgements were largely unaffected by these interindividual differences. The present results clearly contradict the previous assumption that the experienced POT is not influenced by sensory modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":55433,"journal":{"name":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Do \\\"auditory\\\" and \\\"visual\\\" time really feel the same? Effects of stimulus modality on duration and passage-of-time judgements.\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Bratzke\",\"doi\":\"10.3758/s13414-025-03131-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The present study investigated the previous claim that auditory stimuli appear to last longer than visual ones, but that the modality has no influence on the experience of the passage of time (POT). Participants judged the duration, the POT, and the phenomenal quality of the two temporal experiences after hearing a tone or viewing a blue square with a duration between 200 ms and 5 s. The results showed modality effects on both duration and POT judgements, with longer duration and slower POT judgements for auditory than for visual stimuli. Judgements of phenomenal quality showed large interindividual differences, with most participants showing positive but some also negative relationships with target duration for both qualities. Importantly, duration and POT judgements were largely unaffected by these interindividual differences. The present results clearly contradict the previous assumption that the experienced POT is not influenced by sensory modality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55433,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Attention Perception & Psychophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03131-5\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Attention Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13414-025-03131-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了先前的说法,即听觉刺激似乎比视觉刺激持续时间更长,但其形式对时间流逝的体验没有影响。参与者在听到一个音调或看到一个蓝色方块的持续时间在200毫秒到5秒之间后,判断这两种时间体验的持续时间、POT和现象质量。结果表明,模态对持续时间和POT判断都有影响,听觉刺激比视觉刺激持续时间更长,POT判断速度更慢。非凡品质的判断表现出很大的个体差异,大多数参与者对这两种品质的目标持续时间表现出积极的关系,但也有一些人表现出消极的关系。重要的是,持续时间和POT判断在很大程度上不受这些个体差异的影响。目前的结果显然与先前的假设相矛盾,即经验POT不受感觉模态的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Do "auditory" and "visual" time really feel the same? Effects of stimulus modality on duration and passage-of-time judgements.

The present study investigated the previous claim that auditory stimuli appear to last longer than visual ones, but that the modality has no influence on the experience of the passage of time (POT). Participants judged the duration, the POT, and the phenomenal quality of the two temporal experiences after hearing a tone or viewing a blue square with a duration between 200 ms and 5 s. The results showed modality effects on both duration and POT judgements, with longer duration and slower POT judgements for auditory than for visual stimuli. Judgements of phenomenal quality showed large interindividual differences, with most participants showing positive but some also negative relationships with target duration for both qualities. Importantly, duration and POT judgements were largely unaffected by these interindividual differences. The present results clearly contradict the previous assumption that the experienced POT is not influenced by sensory modality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
17.60%
发文量
197
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics is an official journal of the Psychonomic Society. It spans all areas of research in sensory processes, perception, attention, and psychophysics. Most articles published are reports of experimental work; the journal also presents theoretical, integrative, and evaluative reviews. Commentary on issues of importance to researchers appears in a special section of the journal. Founded in 1966 as Perception & Psychophysics, the journal assumed its present name in 2009.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信