完善早期痴呆检测:Mattis痴呆评定量表-2在鉴别多域遗忘性轻度认知障碍和早期阿尔茨海默病中的诊断效用

IF 2.7 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Jesús Cacho-Gutiérrez, Rosalía García-García-Patino, Ricardo García-García, César Aguilera-Vega, Laura Vicente-González, Yinet Cuevas-Pérez, María Victoria Perea-Bartolomé, Valentina Ladera-Fernández, Julián Benito-León
{"title":"完善早期痴呆检测:Mattis痴呆评定量表-2在鉴别多域遗忘性轻度认知障碍和早期阿尔茨海默病中的诊断效用","authors":"Jesús Cacho-Gutiérrez, Rosalía García-García-Patino, Ricardo García-García, César Aguilera-Vega, Laura Vicente-González, Yinet Cuevas-Pérez, María Victoria Perea-Bartolomé, Valentina Ladera-Fernández, Julián Benito-León","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2025.2537902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Early differentiation between amnestic multidomain mild cognitive impairment (aMCI-md) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critical for timely diagnosis and care planning. The Mattis Dementia Rating Scale-2 (DRS-2) is a multidomain cognitive screening tool with potential value in detecting early neurodegenerative changes, though its performance in distinguishing aMCI-md from early AD remains underexplored. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the DRS-2 total and subscale scores in a Spanish clinical cohort by comparing cognitively unimpaired individuals, patients with aMCI-md, and those with early AD. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a cross-sectional study including 684 participants: 333 cognitively healthy controls, 141 with aMCI-md, and 210 with early AD. The DRS-2 was administered as part of a neuropsychological battery. Receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC), and optimal cut-off values were used to assess discriminative performance. <b>Results:</b> The DRS-2 total score and the Memory and Initiation/Perseveration subscales demonstrated good discriminative accuracy across all diagnostic contrasts. In the most clinically relevant comparison (aMCI-md vs. early AD), both the total score and Memory subscale reached an AUC of .87, while Initiation/Perseveration followed closely (AUC = .83). The total score yielded 87.2% accuracy (cut-off = 126), and Memory alone achieved 86.6% accuracy (cut-off = 19). Attention and Construction subscales consistently showed limited diagnostic value. <b>Conclusion:</b> The DRS-2, particularly the Memory and Initiation/Perseveration subscales, appears to be a reliable tool for distinguishing the early stages of cognitive impairment, supporting its clinical use for early diagnosis and risk stratification in memory clinic settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-21"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining early dementia detection: Diagnostic utility of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale-2 in differentiating multidomain amnestic mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease.\",\"authors\":\"Jesús Cacho-Gutiérrez, Rosalía García-García-Patino, Ricardo García-García, César Aguilera-Vega, Laura Vicente-González, Yinet Cuevas-Pérez, María Victoria Perea-Bartolomé, Valentina Ladera-Fernández, Julián Benito-León\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/13854046.2025.2537902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Early differentiation between amnestic multidomain mild cognitive impairment (aMCI-md) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critical for timely diagnosis and care planning. The Mattis Dementia Rating Scale-2 (DRS-2) is a multidomain cognitive screening tool with potential value in detecting early neurodegenerative changes, though its performance in distinguishing aMCI-md from early AD remains underexplored. <b>Objective:</b> To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the DRS-2 total and subscale scores in a Spanish clinical cohort by comparing cognitively unimpaired individuals, patients with aMCI-md, and those with early AD. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a cross-sectional study including 684 participants: 333 cognitively healthy controls, 141 with aMCI-md, and 210 with early AD. The DRS-2 was administered as part of a neuropsychological battery. Receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC), and optimal cut-off values were used to assess discriminative performance. <b>Results:</b> The DRS-2 total score and the Memory and Initiation/Perseveration subscales demonstrated good discriminative accuracy across all diagnostic contrasts. In the most clinically relevant comparison (aMCI-md vs. early AD), both the total score and Memory subscale reached an AUC of .87, while Initiation/Perseveration followed closely (AUC = .83). The total score yielded 87.2% accuracy (cut-off = 126), and Memory alone achieved 86.6% accuracy (cut-off = 19). Attention and Construction subscales consistently showed limited diagnostic value. <b>Conclusion:</b> The DRS-2, particularly the Memory and Initiation/Perseveration subscales, appears to be a reliable tool for distinguishing the early stages of cognitive impairment, supporting its clinical use for early diagnosis and risk stratification in memory clinic settings.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55250,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-21\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Neuropsychologist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2537902\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2025.2537902","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:早期鉴别遗忘性多域轻度认知障碍(aMCI-md)和阿尔茨海默病(AD)对于及时诊断和制定护理计划至关重要。Mattis痴呆评定量表-2 (DRS-2)是一种多领域认知筛查工具,在检测早期神经退行性改变方面具有潜在价值,尽管其在区分aMCI-md和早期AD方面的表现仍未得到充分研究。目的:通过比较认知未受损个体、aMCI-md患者和早期AD患者,评估西班牙临床队列中DRS-2总分和亚量表评分的诊断准确性。方法:我们进行了一项包括684名参与者的横断面研究:333名认知健康对照,141名患有aMCI-md, 210名患有早期AD。DRS-2是作为神经心理学电池的一部分进行的。使用受试者工作特征曲线、曲线下面积(AUC)和最佳截止值来评估鉴别性能。结果:DRS-2总分和记忆和开始/坚持亚量表在所有诊断对比中显示出良好的判别准确性。在最具临床相关性的比较(aMCI-md与早期AD)中,总分和记忆分量表的AUC都达到了0.87,而启动/坚持紧随其后(AUC = 0.83)。总分的准确率为87.2%(截止值为126),单独记忆的准确率为86.6%(截止值为19)。注意和建构分量表一致显示有限的诊断价值。结论:DRS-2,特别是记忆和起始/持续亚量表,似乎是区分认知障碍早期阶段的可靠工具,支持其在记忆临床设置中的早期诊断和风险分层的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Refining early dementia detection: Diagnostic utility of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale-2 in differentiating multidomain amnestic mild cognitive impairment and early Alzheimer's disease.

Background: Early differentiation between amnestic multidomain mild cognitive impairment (aMCI-md) and Alzheimer's disease (AD) is critical for timely diagnosis and care planning. The Mattis Dementia Rating Scale-2 (DRS-2) is a multidomain cognitive screening tool with potential value in detecting early neurodegenerative changes, though its performance in distinguishing aMCI-md from early AD remains underexplored. Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the DRS-2 total and subscale scores in a Spanish clinical cohort by comparing cognitively unimpaired individuals, patients with aMCI-md, and those with early AD. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study including 684 participants: 333 cognitively healthy controls, 141 with aMCI-md, and 210 with early AD. The DRS-2 was administered as part of a neuropsychological battery. Receiver operating characteristic curves, area under the curve (AUC), and optimal cut-off values were used to assess discriminative performance. Results: The DRS-2 total score and the Memory and Initiation/Perseveration subscales demonstrated good discriminative accuracy across all diagnostic contrasts. In the most clinically relevant comparison (aMCI-md vs. early AD), both the total score and Memory subscale reached an AUC of .87, while Initiation/Perseveration followed closely (AUC = .83). The total score yielded 87.2% accuracy (cut-off = 126), and Memory alone achieved 86.6% accuracy (cut-off = 19). Attention and Construction subscales consistently showed limited diagnostic value. Conclusion: The DRS-2, particularly the Memory and Initiation/Perseveration subscales, appears to be a reliable tool for distinguishing the early stages of cognitive impairment, supporting its clinical use for early diagnosis and risk stratification in memory clinic settings.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信