颈斜韧带骨化:对颈内动脉血流的未证实风险。

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY
Clinical Anatomy Pub Date : 2025-07-24 DOI:10.1002/ca.70010
Mustafa Nadi, Refat Aboghazleh, Waleed F Dabbas, Bilal Ibrahim, Mohmmad Al-Slehat, Abdel Haleem Al-Bqour, Tahani Ahmad
{"title":"颈斜韧带骨化:对颈内动脉血流的未证实风险。","authors":"Mustafa Nadi, Refat Aboghazleh, Waleed F Dabbas, Bilal Ibrahim, Mohmmad Al-Slehat, Abdel Haleem Al-Bqour, Tahani Ahmad","doi":"10.1002/ca.70010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The ossification of carotico-clinoid ligament (CCL) has been claimed to be a risk factor for blood flow compromise in the corresponding internal carotid artery (ICA). Despite its seriousness, this concept has not been distinctly examined in the literature. A systematic review following the PRISMA-statement was conducted. Searches were performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Neurosurgery Atlas GPT for the terms \"carotico-clinoid ligament and foramen\" in various formats. The clinical role of these structures (focusing on blood flow in ICA) was examined. A global survey targeting neuro-related doctors was conducted to capture the current perspectives of professionals in the field about these structures regarding compromising blood supply to ICA. A bibliometric analysis using Vos viewer was performed to visualize the status of these structures in literature. 59 publications were identified from 1935 through 2024 in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Neurosurgery Atlas GPT databases. The majority of these publications came out in the last 12 years. No case reports supported the claim that ossified CCL could compromise the ICA and brain blood supply. There were 63 respondents from 14 different countries who addressed the questionnaire. Responses from five neuro-related specialties were analyzed, but neurologists (zero respondents). No one reported personal experience or awareness that CCF could compromise blood flow to the ICA. Vos viewer analysis showed that endoscopic neurosurgical approaches enhanced the understanding of CCL in the last decade. No evidence was found to support that the ossified CCL could compromise the ICA or brain blood supply.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carotico-Clinoid Ligament Ossification: Unproven Risk to Internal Carotid Artery Flow.\",\"authors\":\"Mustafa Nadi, Refat Aboghazleh, Waleed F Dabbas, Bilal Ibrahim, Mohmmad Al-Slehat, Abdel Haleem Al-Bqour, Tahani Ahmad\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ca.70010\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The ossification of carotico-clinoid ligament (CCL) has been claimed to be a risk factor for blood flow compromise in the corresponding internal carotid artery (ICA). Despite its seriousness, this concept has not been distinctly examined in the literature. A systematic review following the PRISMA-statement was conducted. Searches were performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Neurosurgery Atlas GPT for the terms \\\"carotico-clinoid ligament and foramen\\\" in various formats. The clinical role of these structures (focusing on blood flow in ICA) was examined. A global survey targeting neuro-related doctors was conducted to capture the current perspectives of professionals in the field about these structures regarding compromising blood supply to ICA. A bibliometric analysis using Vos viewer was performed to visualize the status of these structures in literature. 59 publications were identified from 1935 through 2024 in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Neurosurgery Atlas GPT databases. The majority of these publications came out in the last 12 years. No case reports supported the claim that ossified CCL could compromise the ICA and brain blood supply. There were 63 respondents from 14 different countries who addressed the questionnaire. Responses from five neuro-related specialties were analyzed, but neurologists (zero respondents). No one reported personal experience or awareness that CCF could compromise blood flow to the ICA. Vos viewer analysis showed that endoscopic neurosurgical approaches enhanced the understanding of CCL in the last decade. No evidence was found to support that the ossified CCL could compromise the ICA or brain blood supply.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50687,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical Anatomy\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical Anatomy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70010\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.70010","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

颈斜韧带(CCL)骨化被认为是相应颈内动脉(ICA)血流受损的危险因素。尽管其严重性,这一概念还没有在文献中明确审查。在prisma声明之后进行了系统审查。在PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library和Neurosurgery Atlas GPT中以各种格式搜索“颈斜韧带和孔”。研究了这些结构的临床作用(重点是ICA的血流)。针对神经相关医生进行了一项全球调查,以了解该领域专业人员对这些结构对ICA血液供应的影响的当前观点。使用Vos查看器进行文献计量学分析,以可视化这些结构在文献中的地位。从1935年到2024年,在PubMed、MEDLINE和神经外科Atlas GPT数据库中确定了59篇出版物。这些出版物大多是在过去12年出版的。没有病例报告支持骨化的CCL会损害ICA和脑血供的说法。来自14个不同国家的63名受访者填写了问卷。分析了来自五个神经相关专业的回复,但神经学家(零回复)。没有人报告个人经验或意识到CCF会损害流向ICA的血液。Vos观察分析显示,在过去十年中,内窥镜神经外科方法增强了对CCL的认识。没有证据表明骨化的CCL会损害ICA或脑血供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carotico-Clinoid Ligament Ossification: Unproven Risk to Internal Carotid Artery Flow.

The ossification of carotico-clinoid ligament (CCL) has been claimed to be a risk factor for blood flow compromise in the corresponding internal carotid artery (ICA). Despite its seriousness, this concept has not been distinctly examined in the literature. A systematic review following the PRISMA-statement was conducted. Searches were performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and Neurosurgery Atlas GPT for the terms "carotico-clinoid ligament and foramen" in various formats. The clinical role of these structures (focusing on blood flow in ICA) was examined. A global survey targeting neuro-related doctors was conducted to capture the current perspectives of professionals in the field about these structures regarding compromising blood supply to ICA. A bibliometric analysis using Vos viewer was performed to visualize the status of these structures in literature. 59 publications were identified from 1935 through 2024 in the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Neurosurgery Atlas GPT databases. The majority of these publications came out in the last 12 years. No case reports supported the claim that ossified CCL could compromise the ICA and brain blood supply. There were 63 respondents from 14 different countries who addressed the questionnaire. Responses from five neuro-related specialties were analyzed, but neurologists (zero respondents). No one reported personal experience or awareness that CCF could compromise blood flow to the ICA. Vos viewer analysis showed that endoscopic neurosurgical approaches enhanced the understanding of CCL in the last decade. No evidence was found to support that the ossified CCL could compromise the ICA or brain blood supply.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Anatomy
Clinical Anatomy 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Anatomy is the Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. The goal of Clinical Anatomy is to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between anatomists and clinicians. This journal embraces anatomy in all its aspects as applied to medical practice. Furthermore, the journal assists physicians and other health care providers in keeping abreast of new methodologies for patient management and informs educators of new developments in clinical anatomy and teaching techniques. Clinical Anatomy publishes original and review articles of scientific, clinical, and educational interest. Papers covering the application of anatomic principles to the solution of clinical problems and/or the application of clinical observations to expand anatomic knowledge are welcomed.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信