探索临床听力损失与压力和焦虑感知之间的联系。

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Aaron Michael Roman, Elizabeth Sedunov
{"title":"探索临床听力损失与压力和焦虑感知之间的联系。","authors":"Aaron Michael Roman, Elizabeth Sedunov","doi":"10.3766/jaaa.240129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Current literature is conflicting and unclear when comparing perceived stress and anxiety with hearing loss. This study assesses the relationship of standard audiometric measurements to perceived stress, anxiety, and hearing impairment.<b>Research Design:</b> All participants were seen for a comprehensive audiological evaluation. Participants' best pure tone average (PTA) and high-frequency pure tone average (HF-PTA) were calculated from measured behavioral thresholds to pure tones of 500-8000 Hz. Word recognition scores (WRS) were obtained for each ear. Participants completed the Reduced Hearing Handicap Index Screening (RHHI-S), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 item (GAD-7) questionnaires.<b>Study Sample:</b> Sixty-two participants seen for audiological evaluations participated in this study. The mean age of participant was 62.6 (±16.8) years.<b>Data Collection and Analysis:</b> Participants were grouped into age categories and analyses of variance were used to determine whether a significant difference existed among the questionnaires across the four age groups. Pearson's <i>r</i> correlation coefficients were used to determine a relationship between all measurements, and <i>t</i> tests were used to determine whether a difference in questionnaire score existed between previous hearing aid users and non-hearing aid users. Hierarchical regression analyses were applied to determine whether perceived stress or perceived hearing loss has a significant predictor in audiometric testing.<b>Results:</b> RHHI scores were significantly higher in those with hearing loss and the participant group containing those with hearing loss that wore hearing aids compared to those who did not. Additionally, GAD-7 scores significantly predicted PSS scores. All other comparisons were nonsignificant.<b>Conclusions:</b> The results from this study suggest that insights into stress and anxiety may be beneficial for counseling, but they do not seem to be related to severity of hearing impairment or speech in quiet performance.<b>Clinical Relevance Statement:</b> Questionnaires can provide significant insight into the perceptions of patients seeking clinical care. The findings from this study find that the RHHI-S significantly correlates with common behavioral measurements of hearing. Questionnaires that reflect on anxiety and perceived stress levels have no correlation to these measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":50021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Exploring the Link Between Clinical Hearing Loss and Perceptions of Stress and Anxiety.\",\"authors\":\"Aaron Michael Roman, Elizabeth Sedunov\",\"doi\":\"10.3766/jaaa.240129\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> Current literature is conflicting and unclear when comparing perceived stress and anxiety with hearing loss. This study assesses the relationship of standard audiometric measurements to perceived stress, anxiety, and hearing impairment.<b>Research Design:</b> All participants were seen for a comprehensive audiological evaluation. Participants' best pure tone average (PTA) and high-frequency pure tone average (HF-PTA) were calculated from measured behavioral thresholds to pure tones of 500-8000 Hz. Word recognition scores (WRS) were obtained for each ear. Participants completed the Reduced Hearing Handicap Index Screening (RHHI-S), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 item (GAD-7) questionnaires.<b>Study Sample:</b> Sixty-two participants seen for audiological evaluations participated in this study. The mean age of participant was 62.6 (±16.8) years.<b>Data Collection and Analysis:</b> Participants were grouped into age categories and analyses of variance were used to determine whether a significant difference existed among the questionnaires across the four age groups. Pearson's <i>r</i> correlation coefficients were used to determine a relationship between all measurements, and <i>t</i> tests were used to determine whether a difference in questionnaire score existed between previous hearing aid users and non-hearing aid users. Hierarchical regression analyses were applied to determine whether perceived stress or perceived hearing loss has a significant predictor in audiometric testing.<b>Results:</b> RHHI scores were significantly higher in those with hearing loss and the participant group containing those with hearing loss that wore hearing aids compared to those who did not. Additionally, GAD-7 scores significantly predicted PSS scores. All other comparisons were nonsignificant.<b>Conclusions:</b> The results from this study suggest that insights into stress and anxiety may be beneficial for counseling, but they do not seem to be related to severity of hearing impairment or speech in quiet performance.<b>Clinical Relevance Statement:</b> Questionnaires can provide significant insight into the perceptions of patients seeking clinical care. The findings from this study find that the RHHI-S significantly correlates with common behavioral measurements of hearing. Questionnaires that reflect on anxiety and perceived stress levels have no correlation to these measurements.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.240129\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Audiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3766/jaaa.240129","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:目前的文献在比较感知压力和焦虑与听力损失时是相互矛盾和不明确的。本研究评估标准听力测量与感知压力、焦虑和听力损害的关系。研究设计:对所有参与者进行全面的听力学评估。参与者的最佳纯音平均(PTA)和高频纯音平均(HF-PTA)从测量的行为阈值计算到500- 8000hz的纯音。获得每只耳朵的单词识别分数(WRS)。参与者完成了听力障碍指数筛查(RHHI-S)、感知压力量表(PSS)和广泛性焦虑障碍-7项(GAD-7)问卷调查。研究样本:62名接受听力学评估的参与者参加了本研究。参与者平均年龄为62.6(±16.8)岁。数据收集与分析:将参与者按年龄分组,采用方差分析来确定四个年龄组之间的问卷是否存在显著差异。使用Pearson’s r相关系数来确定所有测量值之间的关系,并使用t检验来确定以前助听器使用者与非助听器使用者之间是否存在问卷得分的差异。应用层次回归分析来确定感知压力或感知听力损失是否在听力测试中具有显著的预测因子。结果:听力损失组和听力损失组佩戴助听器的RHHI评分明显高于未佩戴助听器的RHHI评分。此外,GAD-7评分显著预测PSS评分。其他比较均不显著。结论:这项研究的结果表明,对压力和焦虑的洞察可能对咨询有益,但它们似乎与听力障碍的严重程度或安静表现中的语言无关。临床相关性声明:问卷调查可以为寻求临床护理的患者的看法提供重要的见解。本研究的结果发现,RHHI-S与听力的常见行为测量显着相关。反映焦虑和感知压力水平的问卷与这些测量结果没有相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Exploring the Link Between Clinical Hearing Loss and Perceptions of Stress and Anxiety.

Purpose: Current literature is conflicting and unclear when comparing perceived stress and anxiety with hearing loss. This study assesses the relationship of standard audiometric measurements to perceived stress, anxiety, and hearing impairment.Research Design: All participants were seen for a comprehensive audiological evaluation. Participants' best pure tone average (PTA) and high-frequency pure tone average (HF-PTA) were calculated from measured behavioral thresholds to pure tones of 500-8000 Hz. Word recognition scores (WRS) were obtained for each ear. Participants completed the Reduced Hearing Handicap Index Screening (RHHI-S), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 item (GAD-7) questionnaires.Study Sample: Sixty-two participants seen for audiological evaluations participated in this study. The mean age of participant was 62.6 (±16.8) years.Data Collection and Analysis: Participants were grouped into age categories and analyses of variance were used to determine whether a significant difference existed among the questionnaires across the four age groups. Pearson's r correlation coefficients were used to determine a relationship between all measurements, and t tests were used to determine whether a difference in questionnaire score existed between previous hearing aid users and non-hearing aid users. Hierarchical regression analyses were applied to determine whether perceived stress or perceived hearing loss has a significant predictor in audiometric testing.Results: RHHI scores were significantly higher in those with hearing loss and the participant group containing those with hearing loss that wore hearing aids compared to those who did not. Additionally, GAD-7 scores significantly predicted PSS scores. All other comparisons were nonsignificant.Conclusions: The results from this study suggest that insights into stress and anxiety may be beneficial for counseling, but they do not seem to be related to severity of hearing impairment or speech in quiet performance.Clinical Relevance Statement: Questionnaires can provide significant insight into the perceptions of patients seeking clinical care. The findings from this study find that the RHHI-S significantly correlates with common behavioral measurements of hearing. Questionnaires that reflect on anxiety and perceived stress levels have no correlation to these measurements.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
46
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Audiology (JAAA) is the Academy''s scholarly peer-reviewed publication, issued 10 times per year and available to Academy members as a benefit of membership. The JAAA publishes articles and clinical reports in all areas of audiology, including audiological assessment, amplification, aural habilitation and rehabilitation, auditory electrophysiology, vestibular assessment, and hearing science.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信