细胞病理学家在放射科医生的协助下对甲状腺外头颈部病变进行细针穿刺细胞学诊断的准确性:一项单中心研究。

IF 3.1 4区 医学 Q2 PATHOLOGY
Cytojournal Pub Date : 2025-06-02 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.25259/Cytojournal_247_2024
Busra Yaprak Bayrak, Nadir Paksoy
{"title":"细胞病理学家在放射科医生的协助下对甲状腺外头颈部病变进行细针穿刺细胞学诊断的准确性:一项单中心研究。","authors":"Busra Yaprak Bayrak, Nadir Paksoy","doi":"10.25259/Cytojournal_247_2024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recent years, several publications have described the use of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) by cytopathologists to achieve better diagnostic accuracy. Some cytopathologists enroll in courses to learn and apply ultrasound (US) guidance themselves. However, no standard procedure has been established that cytopathologists can follow to perform US for FNA. Alternatively, FNA can be a useful tool when cytopathologists collaborate with radiologists. Here, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FNA for non-thyroidal head-and-neck masses retrieved by a cytopathologist with US guidance provided by a radiologist.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The FNA results for non-thyroidal head-and-neck masses at a private clinic using the Scandinavian FNA model with radiologist‒cytopathologist collaboration were compared with the histopathology results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 1890 patients who underwent FNA were identified, among whom 1435 (76%) also had histopathological results. Non-cystic lesions were obtained from lymph nodes (LNs), salivary glands, and soft tissue, while the other lesions were cystic in nature. For FNA, the accuracy was 99.4%, the sensitivity was 99.6%, the specificity was 99.3%, the positive predictive value was 99.3%, and the negative predictive value was 99.6%. No FNA results were non-diagnostic. Surgical follow-up revealed that only eight of the 1435 assessments (0.5%), all performed for LN lesions, yielded false-negative or false-positive results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study is based on single-center observations. The use of FNA, when performed by a specialized cytopathologist and with US assistance from a radiologist, produces accurate results and sufficient material for analysis, especially for LNs in extrathyroidal head-and-neck lesions. This study also reveals that the technique is a low-cost and effective process. The way in which FNA is presented here indicates that this procedure would be useful and ideal for any health service.</p>","PeriodicalId":49082,"journal":{"name":"Cytojournal","volume":"22 ","pages":"57"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289109/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for extrathyroidal head-and-neck lesions performed by a cytopathologist with the assistance of radiologist: A single-center study.\",\"authors\":\"Busra Yaprak Bayrak, Nadir Paksoy\",\"doi\":\"10.25259/Cytojournal_247_2024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>In recent years, several publications have described the use of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) by cytopathologists to achieve better diagnostic accuracy. Some cytopathologists enroll in courses to learn and apply ultrasound (US) guidance themselves. However, no standard procedure has been established that cytopathologists can follow to perform US for FNA. Alternatively, FNA can be a useful tool when cytopathologists collaborate with radiologists. Here, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FNA for non-thyroidal head-and-neck masses retrieved by a cytopathologist with US guidance provided by a radiologist.</p><p><strong>Material and methods: </strong>The FNA results for non-thyroidal head-and-neck masses at a private clinic using the Scandinavian FNA model with radiologist‒cytopathologist collaboration were compared with the histopathology results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 1890 patients who underwent FNA were identified, among whom 1435 (76%) also had histopathological results. Non-cystic lesions were obtained from lymph nodes (LNs), salivary glands, and soft tissue, while the other lesions were cystic in nature. For FNA, the accuracy was 99.4%, the sensitivity was 99.6%, the specificity was 99.3%, the positive predictive value was 99.3%, and the negative predictive value was 99.6%. No FNA results were non-diagnostic. Surgical follow-up revealed that only eight of the 1435 assessments (0.5%), all performed for LN lesions, yielded false-negative or false-positive results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The present study is based on single-center observations. The use of FNA, when performed by a specialized cytopathologist and with US assistance from a radiologist, produces accurate results and sufficient material for analysis, especially for LNs in extrathyroidal head-and-neck lesions. This study also reveals that the technique is a low-cost and effective process. The way in which FNA is presented here indicates that this procedure would be useful and ideal for any health service.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cytojournal\",\"volume\":\"22 \",\"pages\":\"57\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289109/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cytojournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_247_2024\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytojournal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25259/Cytojournal_247_2024","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:近年来,一些出版物描述了细胞病理学家使用超声引导的细针穿刺(FNA)来提高诊断准确性。一些细胞病理学家参加课程学习和应用超声(US)指导自己。然而,没有标准的程序,细胞病理学家可以遵循的FNA进行US。另外,当细胞病理学家与放射科医生合作时,FNA可能是一个有用的工具。在这里,我们的目的是评估FNA对由细胞病理学家在放射科医生的指导下获得的非甲状腺性头颈部肿块的诊断准确性。材料和方法:在一家私人诊所使用斯堪的纳维亚FNA模型进行非甲状腺性头颈部肿块的FNA结果与组织病理学结果进行比较。结果:共有1890例患者接受了FNA,其中1435例(76%)也有组织病理学结果。非囊性病变来自淋巴结、唾液腺和软组织,而其他病变则是囊性的。FNA的准确率为99.4%,敏感性为99.6%,特异性为99.3%,阳性预测值为99.3%,阴性预测值为99.6%。没有FNA结果是非诊断性的。手术随访显示,1435次评估中只有8次(0.5%)产生假阴性或假阳性结果,所有评估均针对LN病变。结论:本研究基于单中心观察。当由专业的细胞病理学家和放射科医生的辅助下使用FNA时,可以产生准确的结果和足够的分析材料,特别是对于甲状腺外头颈部病变的ln。研究还表明,该技术是一种低成本、高效的工艺。在这里介绍FNA的方式表明,这一程序对任何保健服务都是有用和理想的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for extrathyroidal head-and-neck lesions performed by a cytopathologist with the assistance of radiologist: A single-center study.

Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for extrathyroidal head-and-neck lesions performed by a cytopathologist with the assistance of radiologist: A single-center study.

Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for extrathyroidal head-and-neck lesions performed by a cytopathologist with the assistance of radiologist: A single-center study.

Diagnostic accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology for extrathyroidal head-and-neck lesions performed by a cytopathologist with the assistance of radiologist: A single-center study.

Objective: In recent years, several publications have described the use of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) by cytopathologists to achieve better diagnostic accuracy. Some cytopathologists enroll in courses to learn and apply ultrasound (US) guidance themselves. However, no standard procedure has been established that cytopathologists can follow to perform US for FNA. Alternatively, FNA can be a useful tool when cytopathologists collaborate with radiologists. Here, we aimed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of FNA for non-thyroidal head-and-neck masses retrieved by a cytopathologist with US guidance provided by a radiologist.

Material and methods: The FNA results for non-thyroidal head-and-neck masses at a private clinic using the Scandinavian FNA model with radiologist‒cytopathologist collaboration were compared with the histopathology results.

Results: In all, 1890 patients who underwent FNA were identified, among whom 1435 (76%) also had histopathological results. Non-cystic lesions were obtained from lymph nodes (LNs), salivary glands, and soft tissue, while the other lesions were cystic in nature. For FNA, the accuracy was 99.4%, the sensitivity was 99.6%, the specificity was 99.3%, the positive predictive value was 99.3%, and the negative predictive value was 99.6%. No FNA results were non-diagnostic. Surgical follow-up revealed that only eight of the 1435 assessments (0.5%), all performed for LN lesions, yielded false-negative or false-positive results.

Conclusion: The present study is based on single-center observations. The use of FNA, when performed by a specialized cytopathologist and with US assistance from a radiologist, produces accurate results and sufficient material for analysis, especially for LNs in extrathyroidal head-and-neck lesions. This study also reveals that the technique is a low-cost and effective process. The way in which FNA is presented here indicates that this procedure would be useful and ideal for any health service.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Cytojournal
Cytojournal PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.10%
发文量
56
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The CytoJournal is an open-access peer-reviewed journal committed to publishing high-quality articles in the field of Diagnostic Cytopathology including Molecular aspects. The journal is owned by the Cytopathology Foundation and published by the Scientific Scholar.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信