权力下放对患者和服务结果的影响:2018年赞比亚多药耐药结核病权力下放的一个案例。

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Tulani Francis L Matenga, Malizgani Paul Chavula, Joseph Mumba Zulu, Adam Silumbwe, Patricia Maritim, Margarate N Munakampe, Batuli Habib, Namakando Liusha, Jeremiah Banda, Ntazana N Sinyangwe, Chris Mweemba, Angel Mubanga, Patrick Kaonga, Mwiche Musukuma, Henry Phiri, Hikabasa Halwiindi
{"title":"权力下放对患者和服务结果的影响:2018年赞比亚多药耐药结核病权力下放的一个案例。","authors":"Tulani Francis L Matenga, Malizgani Paul Chavula, Joseph Mumba Zulu, Adam Silumbwe, Patricia Maritim, Margarate N Munakampe, Batuli Habib, Namakando Liusha, Jeremiah Banda, Ntazana N Sinyangwe, Chris Mweemba, Angel Mubanga, Patrick Kaonga, Mwiche Musukuma, Henry Phiri, Hikabasa Halwiindi","doi":"10.1186/s13690-025-01672-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Zambian government decentralised tuberculosis control programs by transferring responsibility for the care and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients from a two-national hospital model to provincial hospitals and other lower-level healthcare structures. Limited evidence exists on the effects of decentralisation on the quality of TB care provided through public sector decentralisation. In this paper, we explored the impact of decentralising MDR-TB on patient and service outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected through a survey of 244 MDR-TB patients, while qualitative data was collected through interviews with TB coordinators, healthcare providers, patients, and caregivers. Participants were drawn from health facilities and the Ministry of Health. Quantitative data was analysed in STATA version 16.0, while thematic analysis was used for the qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Decentralisation has improved patient care and management by increasing access to essential commodities such as medication and diagnostic testing. It has led to more equitable distribution of MDR-TB healthcare services and resources across different population groups, regardless of social, economic, or demographic factors. Furthermore, the quality of life for MDR-TB patients has improved, with better adherence to medication resulting from increased family support. Due to decentralisation, tailored community and patient-centred services have been integrated resulting in reduced congestion at facilities. The study also identified challenges, including heavy workload for healthcare staff, fragmented coordination of supervisory responsibilities, and confusion over roles in patient management, which negatively impacted the decentralisation process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decentralisation of MDR TB services offers significant benefits but is not a guaranteed solution, as poor planning or implementation can lead to challenges in service delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":48578,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Public Health","volume":"83 1","pages":"193"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288269/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of decentralisation on patient and service outcomes: a case of the 2018 decentralisation of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Zambia.\",\"authors\":\"Tulani Francis L Matenga, Malizgani Paul Chavula, Joseph Mumba Zulu, Adam Silumbwe, Patricia Maritim, Margarate N Munakampe, Batuli Habib, Namakando Liusha, Jeremiah Banda, Ntazana N Sinyangwe, Chris Mweemba, Angel Mubanga, Patrick Kaonga, Mwiche Musukuma, Henry Phiri, Hikabasa Halwiindi\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s13690-025-01672-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The Zambian government decentralised tuberculosis control programs by transferring responsibility for the care and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients from a two-national hospital model to provincial hospitals and other lower-level healthcare structures. Limited evidence exists on the effects of decentralisation on the quality of TB care provided through public sector decentralisation. In this paper, we explored the impact of decentralising MDR-TB on patient and service outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected through a survey of 244 MDR-TB patients, while qualitative data was collected through interviews with TB coordinators, healthcare providers, patients, and caregivers. Participants were drawn from health facilities and the Ministry of Health. Quantitative data was analysed in STATA version 16.0, while thematic analysis was used for the qualitative data.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Decentralisation has improved patient care and management by increasing access to essential commodities such as medication and diagnostic testing. It has led to more equitable distribution of MDR-TB healthcare services and resources across different population groups, regardless of social, economic, or demographic factors. Furthermore, the quality of life for MDR-TB patients has improved, with better adherence to medication resulting from increased family support. Due to decentralisation, tailored community and patient-centred services have been integrated resulting in reduced congestion at facilities. The study also identified challenges, including heavy workload for healthcare staff, fragmented coordination of supervisory responsibilities, and confusion over roles in patient management, which negatively impacted the decentralisation process.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The decentralisation of MDR TB services offers significant benefits but is not a guaranteed solution, as poor planning or implementation can lead to challenges in service delivery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"volume\":\"83 1\",\"pages\":\"193\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12288269/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Public Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01672-7\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Public Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13690-025-01672-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导读:赞比亚政府通过将护理和治疗耐多药结核病(MDR-TB)患者的责任从两家国家医院模式转移到省级医院和其他较低级别的卫生保健机构,下放了结核病控制规划。关于权力下放对通过公共部门权力下放提供的结核病治疗质量的影响的证据有限。在本文中,我们探讨了分散耐多药结核病对患者和服务结果的影响。方法:本研究采用混合方法。通过对244名耐多药结核病患者的调查收集定量数据,同时通过对结核病协调员、卫生保健提供者、患者和护理人员的访谈收集定性数据。参与者来自卫生机构和卫生部。定量数据采用STATA 16.0版本进行分析,定性数据采用专题分析。结果:权力下放通过增加获得药物和诊断检测等基本商品的机会,改善了病人的护理和管理。它使耐多药结核病卫生保健服务和资源在不同人群中更加公平地分配,而不受社会、经济或人口因素的影响。此外,耐多药结核病患者的生活质量得到了改善,由于家庭支持的增加,他们对药物的依从性更好。由于权力下放,量身定制的社区和以患者为中心的服务已被整合,从而减少了设施的拥堵。该研究还确定了挑战,包括医疗保健人员的繁重工作量、监督职责的分散协调以及患者管理中角色的混乱,这些都对权力下放进程产生了负面影响。结论:多药耐药结核病服务的分散化提供了显著的好处,但不是一个有保证的解决方案,因为规划或实施不当可能导致服务提供方面的挑战。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effects of decentralisation on patient and service outcomes: a case of the 2018 decentralisation of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in Zambia.

Introduction: The Zambian government decentralised tuberculosis control programs by transferring responsibility for the care and treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) patients from a two-national hospital model to provincial hospitals and other lower-level healthcare structures. Limited evidence exists on the effects of decentralisation on the quality of TB care provided through public sector decentralisation. In this paper, we explored the impact of decentralising MDR-TB on patient and service outcomes.

Methods: This study used a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative data were collected through a survey of 244 MDR-TB patients, while qualitative data was collected through interviews with TB coordinators, healthcare providers, patients, and caregivers. Participants were drawn from health facilities and the Ministry of Health. Quantitative data was analysed in STATA version 16.0, while thematic analysis was used for the qualitative data.

Results: Decentralisation has improved patient care and management by increasing access to essential commodities such as medication and diagnostic testing. It has led to more equitable distribution of MDR-TB healthcare services and resources across different population groups, regardless of social, economic, or demographic factors. Furthermore, the quality of life for MDR-TB patients has improved, with better adherence to medication resulting from increased family support. Due to decentralisation, tailored community and patient-centred services have been integrated resulting in reduced congestion at facilities. The study also identified challenges, including heavy workload for healthcare staff, fragmented coordination of supervisory responsibilities, and confusion over roles in patient management, which negatively impacted the decentralisation process.

Conclusion: The decentralisation of MDR TB services offers significant benefits but is not a guaranteed solution, as poor planning or implementation can lead to challenges in service delivery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Public Health
Archives of Public Health Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.00%
发文量
244
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: rchives of Public Health is a broad scope public health journal, dedicated to publishing all sound science in the field of public health. The journal aims to better the understanding of the health of populations. The journal contributes to public health knowledge, enhances the interaction between research, policy and practice and stimulates public health monitoring and indicator development. The journal considers submissions on health outcomes and their determinants, with clear statements about the public health and policy implications. Archives of Public Health welcomes methodological papers (e.g., on study design and bias), papers on health services research, health economics, community interventions, and epidemiological studies dealing with international comparisons, the determinants of inequality in health, and the environmental, behavioural, social, demographic and occupational correlates of health and diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信