预测全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)对人体甲状腺素转移的新QSAR模型:开发和应用。

IF 3.9 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Toxics Pub Date : 2025-07-14 DOI:10.3390/toxics13070590
Marco Evangelista, Nicola Chirico, Ester Papa
{"title":"预测全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)对人体甲状腺素转移的新QSAR模型:开发和应用。","authors":"Marco Evangelista, Nicola Chirico, Ester Papa","doi":"10.3390/toxics13070590","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are of concern because of their potential thyroid hormone system disruption by binding to human transthyretin (hTTR). However, the amount of experimental data is scarce. In this work, new classification and regression QSARs were developed to predict the hTTR disruption based on experimental data measured for 134 PFAS. Bootstrapping, randomization procedures, and external validation were used to check for overfitting, to avoid random correlations, and to evaluate the predictivity of the QSARs, respectively. The best QSARs were characterized by good performances (e.g., training and test accuracies in classification of 0.89 and 0.85, respectively; R<sup>2</sup>, Q<sup>2</sup><sub>loo</sub>, and Q<sup>2</sup><sub>F3</sub> in regression of 0.81, 0.77, and 0.82, respectively) and significantly broader domains compared to the few existing similar models. The application of QSARs application to the OECD List of PFAS allowed for the identification of structural categories of major concern, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl ether-based, perfluoroalkyl carbonyl, and perfluoroalkane sulfonyl compounds. Forty-nine PFAS showed a stronger binding affinity to hTTR than the natural ligand T4. Uncertainty quantification for each model and prediction further enhanced the reliability assessment of predictions. The implementation of the new QSARs in non-commercial software facilitates their application to support future research efforts and regulatory actions.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New QSAR Models to Predict Human Transthyretin Disruption by Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): Development and Application.\",\"authors\":\"Marco Evangelista, Nicola Chirico, Ester Papa\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxics13070590\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are of concern because of their potential thyroid hormone system disruption by binding to human transthyretin (hTTR). However, the amount of experimental data is scarce. In this work, new classification and regression QSARs were developed to predict the hTTR disruption based on experimental data measured for 134 PFAS. Bootstrapping, randomization procedures, and external validation were used to check for overfitting, to avoid random correlations, and to evaluate the predictivity of the QSARs, respectively. The best QSARs were characterized by good performances (e.g., training and test accuracies in classification of 0.89 and 0.85, respectively; R<sup>2</sup>, Q<sup>2</sup><sub>loo</sub>, and Q<sup>2</sup><sub>F3</sub> in regression of 0.81, 0.77, and 0.82, respectively) and significantly broader domains compared to the few existing similar models. The application of QSARs application to the OECD List of PFAS allowed for the identification of structural categories of major concern, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl ether-based, perfluoroalkyl carbonyl, and perfluoroalkane sulfonyl compounds. Forty-nine PFAS showed a stronger binding affinity to hTTR than the natural ligand T4. Uncertainty quantification for each model and prediction further enhanced the reliability assessment of predictions. The implementation of the new QSARs in non-commercial software facilitates their application to support future research efforts and regulatory actions.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxics\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13070590\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13070590","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)受到关注,因为它们与人甲状腺转甲素(hTTR)结合可能会破坏甲状腺激素系统。然而,实验数据的量是稀缺的。在这项工作中,基于134个PFAS的实验数据,开发了新的分类和回归qsar来预测hTTR中断。分别使用引导、随机化程序和外部验证来检查过拟合、避免随机相关性和评估qsar的预测性。最佳qsar具有良好的性能(例如,训练和测试的分类准确率分别为0.89和0.85;R2, Q2loo和Q2F3的回归分别为0.81,0.77和0.82),并且与现有的几个类似模型相比,域明显更广。QSARs应用于经合组织的全氟烷基化合物清单,可以确定主要关注的结构类别,如全氟烷基和多氟烷基醚基化合物、全氟烷基羰基化合物和全氟烷烃磺酰基化合物。49个PFAS对hTTR的结合亲和力高于天然配体T4。对各模型和预测的不确定性进行量化,进一步增强了预测的可靠性评估。在非商业软件中实施新的QSARs有助于它们的应用,以支持未来的研究工作和监管行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New QSAR Models to Predict Human Transthyretin Disruption by Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS): Development and Application.

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are of concern because of their potential thyroid hormone system disruption by binding to human transthyretin (hTTR). However, the amount of experimental data is scarce. In this work, new classification and regression QSARs were developed to predict the hTTR disruption based on experimental data measured for 134 PFAS. Bootstrapping, randomization procedures, and external validation were used to check for overfitting, to avoid random correlations, and to evaluate the predictivity of the QSARs, respectively. The best QSARs were characterized by good performances (e.g., training and test accuracies in classification of 0.89 and 0.85, respectively; R2, Q2loo, and Q2F3 in regression of 0.81, 0.77, and 0.82, respectively) and significantly broader domains compared to the few existing similar models. The application of QSARs application to the OECD List of PFAS allowed for the identification of structural categories of major concern, such as per- and polyfluoroalkyl ether-based, perfluoroalkyl carbonyl, and perfluoroalkane sulfonyl compounds. Forty-nine PFAS showed a stronger binding affinity to hTTR than the natural ligand T4. Uncertainty quantification for each model and prediction further enhanced the reliability assessment of predictions. The implementation of the new QSARs in non-commercial software facilitates their application to support future research efforts and regulatory actions.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Toxics
Toxics Chemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信