Panagiotis Stathopoulos, Laura T Romanos, Charalampos Loutradis, Matthew E Falagas
{"title":"新抗生素的肾毒性:系统综述。","authors":"Panagiotis Stathopoulos, Laura T Romanos, Charalampos Loutradis, Matthew E Falagas","doi":"10.3390/toxics13070606","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Drug-induced nephrotoxicity is a common and serious problem in clinical practice. We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting nephrotoxicity events associated with antibiotics approved since 2018. The agents assessed included aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefiderocol, ceftobiprole, contezolid, gepotidacin, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, lascufloxacin, lefamulin, levonadifloxacin, plazomicin, and sulbactam/durlobactam. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and major pharmacovigilance databases (Vigibase, FAERS, EudraVigilance, EMA, FDA, NMPA, PMDA, and CDSCO) in May 2025, along with reference citation tracking. Studies were included if they reported safety or adverse event data. The risk of bias was assessed using validated tools in accordance with the study design. Out of 2105 potentially relevant records, 74 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 52 clinical trials, 17 observational studies, 1 registry-based study, 3 case series, and 1 case report. Nephrotoxicity was rarely reported for any of the newly approved antibiotics. No renal adverse events were found in the available studies for aztreonam/avibactam, levonadifloxacin, and contezolid. Most studies were of moderate to high quality; two were classified as low quality. However, nephrotoxicity was inconsistently assessed, with variable definitions and methodologies used. Although current data suggest a low frequency of nephrotoxicity, limitations in study design and reporting preclude firm conclusions. There is a need for post-marketing studies to better characterize renal safety. Clinicians should remain vigilant and continue to monitor for and report renal-related adverse events.</p>","PeriodicalId":23195,"journal":{"name":"Toxics","volume":"13 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12299473/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nephrotoxicity of New Antibiotics: A Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"Panagiotis Stathopoulos, Laura T Romanos, Charalampos Loutradis, Matthew E Falagas\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/toxics13070606\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Drug-induced nephrotoxicity is a common and serious problem in clinical practice. We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting nephrotoxicity events associated with antibiotics approved since 2018. The agents assessed included aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefiderocol, ceftobiprole, contezolid, gepotidacin, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, lascufloxacin, lefamulin, levonadifloxacin, plazomicin, and sulbactam/durlobactam. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and major pharmacovigilance databases (Vigibase, FAERS, EudraVigilance, EMA, FDA, NMPA, PMDA, and CDSCO) in May 2025, along with reference citation tracking. Studies were included if they reported safety or adverse event data. The risk of bias was assessed using validated tools in accordance with the study design. Out of 2105 potentially relevant records, 74 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 52 clinical trials, 17 observational studies, 1 registry-based study, 3 case series, and 1 case report. Nephrotoxicity was rarely reported for any of the newly approved antibiotics. No renal adverse events were found in the available studies for aztreonam/avibactam, levonadifloxacin, and contezolid. Most studies were of moderate to high quality; two were classified as low quality. However, nephrotoxicity was inconsistently assessed, with variable definitions and methodologies used. Although current data suggest a low frequency of nephrotoxicity, limitations in study design and reporting preclude firm conclusions. There is a need for post-marketing studies to better characterize renal safety. Clinicians should remain vigilant and continue to monitor for and report renal-related adverse events.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23195,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Toxics\",\"volume\":\"13 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12299473/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Toxics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13070606\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Toxics","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/toxics13070606","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
药物性肾毒性是临床上常见而严重的问题。我们对2018年以来批准的与抗生素相关的肾毒性事件的研究进行了系统回顾。评估的药物包括阿曲南/阿维巴坦、头孢吡肟/恩美唑巴坦、头孢地罗、头孢双prole、康替唑胺、吉波他汀、亚胺培南/西司他汀/乐巴坦、拉库沙星、去福霉素、左旋地沙星、plazomicin和舒巴坦/杜罗巴坦。于2025年5月在PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和主要药物警戒数据库(Vigibase、FAERS、EudraVigilance、EMA、FDA、NMPA、PMDA和CDSCO)中进行文献检索,并进行参考引文跟踪。如果研究报告了安全性或不良事件数据,则纳入研究。根据研究设计,使用经过验证的工具评估偏倚风险。在2105份可能相关的记录中,74项研究符合纳入标准,包括52项临床试验、17项观察性研究、1项注册研究、3个病例系列和1份病例报告。新批准的抗生素很少有肾毒性的报道。在现有的研究中,没有发现阿曲南/阿维巴坦、左氧氟沙星和康替唑胺的肾脏不良事件。大多数研究是中等到高质量的;其中两份被列为低质量。然而,肾毒性的评估不一致,使用了不同的定义和方法。虽然目前的数据表明肾毒性发生率较低,但研究设计和报告的局限性阻碍了确定的结论。有必要进行上市后研究,以更好地表征肾脏安全性。临床医生应保持警惕,继续监测和报告肾脏相关的不良事件。
Nephrotoxicity of New Antibiotics: A Systematic Review.
Drug-induced nephrotoxicity is a common and serious problem in clinical practice. We conducted a systematic review of studies reporting nephrotoxicity events associated with antibiotics approved since 2018. The agents assessed included aztreonam/avibactam, cefepime/enmetazobactam, cefiderocol, ceftobiprole, contezolid, gepotidacin, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, lascufloxacin, lefamulin, levonadifloxacin, plazomicin, and sulbactam/durlobactam. Literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and major pharmacovigilance databases (Vigibase, FAERS, EudraVigilance, EMA, FDA, NMPA, PMDA, and CDSCO) in May 2025, along with reference citation tracking. Studies were included if they reported safety or adverse event data. The risk of bias was assessed using validated tools in accordance with the study design. Out of 2105 potentially relevant records, 74 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 52 clinical trials, 17 observational studies, 1 registry-based study, 3 case series, and 1 case report. Nephrotoxicity was rarely reported for any of the newly approved antibiotics. No renal adverse events were found in the available studies for aztreonam/avibactam, levonadifloxacin, and contezolid. Most studies were of moderate to high quality; two were classified as low quality. However, nephrotoxicity was inconsistently assessed, with variable definitions and methodologies used. Although current data suggest a low frequency of nephrotoxicity, limitations in study design and reporting preclude firm conclusions. There is a need for post-marketing studies to better characterize renal safety. Clinicians should remain vigilant and continue to monitor for and report renal-related adverse events.
ToxicsChemical Engineering-Chemical Health and Safety
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.90%
发文量
681
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍:
Toxics (ISSN 2305-6304) is an international, peer-reviewed, open access journal which provides an advanced forum for studies related to all aspects of toxic chemicals and materials. It publishes reviews, regular research papers, and short communications. Our aim is to encourage scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in detail. There is, therefore, no restriction on the maximum length of the papers, although authors should write their papers in a clear and concise way. The full experimental details must be provided so that the results can be reproduced. Electronic files or software regarding the full details of calculations and experimental procedure can be deposited as supplementary material, if it is not possible to publish them along with the text.