Clareon Vivity和PureSee人工晶状体的评价:光学质量、聚焦深度和不对准效果。

IF 3.9 2区 综合性期刊 Q1 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES
Ava Niknahad, Zhiyi Wu, Hyeck-Soo Son, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia, Grzegorz Łabuz
{"title":"Clareon Vivity和PureSee人工晶状体的评价:光学质量、聚焦深度和不对准效果。","authors":"Ava Niknahad, Zhiyi Wu, Hyeck-Soo Son, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia, Grzegorz Łabuz","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-07970-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses allow cataract and refractive-lens-exchange patients to have improved vision at an intermediate distance. Two EDoF lenses, Clareon Vivity and Tecnis PureSee, were evaluated for optical quality using the OptiSpheric IOL Pro2 according to ISO 11979-2 guidelines and measured using Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and 1951 USAF resolution test chart at 3.0- and 4.5-mm apertures. The IOLs' tolerance to 0.50 mm decentration and a 5° tilt were tested. The unwanted visual effects were compared using their light distribution at 4.5 mm aperture beyond a polychromatic point spread function center. The two models demonstrated comparable optical qualities at intermediate and far focuses; the predicted visual acuities for the Vivity and PureSee were respectively - 0.04 versus - 0.05logMAR at 0 diopter and 0.05 versus 0.07logMAR at - 1.50 diopters of defocus. Increasing pupil size decreased both lenses' optical quality. While decentration decreased the optical quality of both models, tilt had less of an effect. Both were similar in introducing minimal unwanted side effects through visualizing a halo pattern. The results indicate that these lenses offer a good option for patients interested in EDoF lenses and future clinical studies should contribute further insight into their performance and side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"26943"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects.\",\"authors\":\"Ava Niknahad, Zhiyi Wu, Hyeck-Soo Son, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia, Grzegorz Łabuz\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-07970-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses allow cataract and refractive-lens-exchange patients to have improved vision at an intermediate distance. Two EDoF lenses, Clareon Vivity and Tecnis PureSee, were evaluated for optical quality using the OptiSpheric IOL Pro2 according to ISO 11979-2 guidelines and measured using Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and 1951 USAF resolution test chart at 3.0- and 4.5-mm apertures. The IOLs' tolerance to 0.50 mm decentration and a 5° tilt were tested. The unwanted visual effects were compared using their light distribution at 4.5 mm aperture beyond a polychromatic point spread function center. The two models demonstrated comparable optical qualities at intermediate and far focuses; the predicted visual acuities for the Vivity and PureSee were respectively - 0.04 versus - 0.05logMAR at 0 diopter and 0.05 versus 0.07logMAR at - 1.50 diopters of defocus. Increasing pupil size decreased both lenses' optical quality. While decentration decreased the optical quality of both models, tilt had less of an effect. Both were similar in introducing minimal unwanted side effects through visualizing a halo pattern. The results indicate that these lenses offer a good option for patients interested in EDoF lenses and future clinical studies should contribute further insight into their performance and side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"26943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07970-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07970-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

扩展聚焦深度人工晶体(EDoF)使白内障和屈光晶体置换患者在中距离处的视力得到改善。根据ISO 11979-2指南,使用optisphere IOL Pro2对Clareon Vivity和Tecnis PureSee两种EDoF透镜进行光学质量评估,并使用调制传递函数(MTF)和1951年USAF分辨率测试图在3.0和4.5 mm孔径下进行测量。测试了人工晶体对0.50 mm偏心和5°倾斜的容忍度。利用多色点扩展函数中心外4.5 mm孔径处的光分布,比较了不需要的视觉效果。两种模型在中焦和远焦的光学质量相当;Vivity和PureSee在0屈光度下的预测视力分别为- 0.04和- 0.05 logmar,在- 1.50屈光度下的预测视力分别为0.05和0.07logMAR。瞳孔增大会降低两种镜片的光学质量。虽然分散降低了两个模型的光学质量,但倾斜的影响较小。这两种方法都是相似的,通过可视化光晕模式来引入最小的不必要的副作用。结果表明,这些隐形眼镜为对EDoF隐形眼镜感兴趣的患者提供了一个很好的选择,未来的临床研究应该进一步了解它们的性能和副作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects.

Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects.

Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects.

Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects.

Extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses allow cataract and refractive-lens-exchange patients to have improved vision at an intermediate distance. Two EDoF lenses, Clareon Vivity and Tecnis PureSee, were evaluated for optical quality using the OptiSpheric IOL Pro2 according to ISO 11979-2 guidelines and measured using Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and 1951 USAF resolution test chart at 3.0- and 4.5-mm apertures. The IOLs' tolerance to 0.50 mm decentration and a 5° tilt were tested. The unwanted visual effects were compared using their light distribution at 4.5 mm aperture beyond a polychromatic point spread function center. The two models demonstrated comparable optical qualities at intermediate and far focuses; the predicted visual acuities for the Vivity and PureSee were respectively - 0.04 versus - 0.05logMAR at 0 diopter and 0.05 versus 0.07logMAR at - 1.50 diopters of defocus. Increasing pupil size decreased both lenses' optical quality. While decentration decreased the optical quality of both models, tilt had less of an effect. Both were similar in introducing minimal unwanted side effects through visualizing a halo pattern. The results indicate that these lenses offer a good option for patients interested in EDoF lenses and future clinical studies should contribute further insight into their performance and side effects.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Scientific Reports
Scientific Reports Natural Science Disciplines-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
19567
审稿时长
3.9 months
期刊介绍: We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections. Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021). •Engineering Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live. •Physical sciences Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics. •Earth and environmental sciences Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems. •Biological sciences Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants. •Health sciences The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信