Ava Niknahad, Zhiyi Wu, Hyeck-Soo Son, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia, Grzegorz Łabuz
{"title":"Clareon Vivity和PureSee人工晶状体的评价:光学质量、聚焦深度和不对准效果。","authors":"Ava Niknahad, Zhiyi Wu, Hyeck-Soo Son, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia, Grzegorz Łabuz","doi":"10.1038/s41598-025-07970-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses allow cataract and refractive-lens-exchange patients to have improved vision at an intermediate distance. Two EDoF lenses, Clareon Vivity and Tecnis PureSee, were evaluated for optical quality using the OptiSpheric IOL Pro2 according to ISO 11979-2 guidelines and measured using Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and 1951 USAF resolution test chart at 3.0- and 4.5-mm apertures. The IOLs' tolerance to 0.50 mm decentration and a 5° tilt were tested. The unwanted visual effects were compared using their light distribution at 4.5 mm aperture beyond a polychromatic point spread function center. The two models demonstrated comparable optical qualities at intermediate and far focuses; the predicted visual acuities for the Vivity and PureSee were respectively - 0.04 versus - 0.05logMAR at 0 diopter and 0.05 versus 0.07logMAR at - 1.50 diopters of defocus. Increasing pupil size decreased both lenses' optical quality. While decentration decreased the optical quality of both models, tilt had less of an effect. Both were similar in introducing minimal unwanted side effects through visualizing a halo pattern. The results indicate that these lenses offer a good option for patients interested in EDoF lenses and future clinical studies should contribute further insight into their performance and side effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":21811,"journal":{"name":"Scientific Reports","volume":"15 1","pages":"26943"},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290095/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects.\",\"authors\":\"Ava Niknahad, Zhiyi Wu, Hyeck-Soo Son, Gerd U Auffarth, Ramin Khoramnia, Grzegorz Łabuz\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41598-025-07970-y\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses allow cataract and refractive-lens-exchange patients to have improved vision at an intermediate distance. Two EDoF lenses, Clareon Vivity and Tecnis PureSee, were evaluated for optical quality using the OptiSpheric IOL Pro2 according to ISO 11979-2 guidelines and measured using Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and 1951 USAF resolution test chart at 3.0- and 4.5-mm apertures. The IOLs' tolerance to 0.50 mm decentration and a 5° tilt were tested. The unwanted visual effects were compared using their light distribution at 4.5 mm aperture beyond a polychromatic point spread function center. The two models demonstrated comparable optical qualities at intermediate and far focuses; the predicted visual acuities for the Vivity and PureSee were respectively - 0.04 versus - 0.05logMAR at 0 diopter and 0.05 versus 0.07logMAR at - 1.50 diopters of defocus. Increasing pupil size decreased both lenses' optical quality. While decentration decreased the optical quality of both models, tilt had less of an effect. Both were similar in introducing minimal unwanted side effects through visualizing a halo pattern. The results indicate that these lenses offer a good option for patients interested in EDoF lenses and future clinical studies should contribute further insight into their performance and side effects.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":21811,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"volume\":\"15 1\",\"pages\":\"26943\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12290095/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Scientific Reports\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"103\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07970-y\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"综合性期刊\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scientific Reports","FirstCategoryId":"103","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-07970-y","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"综合性期刊","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluation of Clareon Vivity and PureSee intraocular lenses: optical quality, depth of focus and misalignment effects.
Extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lenses allow cataract and refractive-lens-exchange patients to have improved vision at an intermediate distance. Two EDoF lenses, Clareon Vivity and Tecnis PureSee, were evaluated for optical quality using the OptiSpheric IOL Pro2 according to ISO 11979-2 guidelines and measured using Modulation Transfer Function (MTF) and 1951 USAF resolution test chart at 3.0- and 4.5-mm apertures. The IOLs' tolerance to 0.50 mm decentration and a 5° tilt were tested. The unwanted visual effects were compared using their light distribution at 4.5 mm aperture beyond a polychromatic point spread function center. The two models demonstrated comparable optical qualities at intermediate and far focuses; the predicted visual acuities for the Vivity and PureSee were respectively - 0.04 versus - 0.05logMAR at 0 diopter and 0.05 versus 0.07logMAR at - 1.50 diopters of defocus. Increasing pupil size decreased both lenses' optical quality. While decentration decreased the optical quality of both models, tilt had less of an effect. Both were similar in introducing minimal unwanted side effects through visualizing a halo pattern. The results indicate that these lenses offer a good option for patients interested in EDoF lenses and future clinical studies should contribute further insight into their performance and side effects.
期刊介绍:
We publish original research from all areas of the natural sciences, psychology, medicine and engineering. You can learn more about what we publish by browsing our specific scientific subject areas below or explore Scientific Reports by browsing all articles and collections.
Scientific Reports has a 2-year impact factor: 4.380 (2021), and is the 6th most-cited journal in the world, with more than 540,000 citations in 2020 (Clarivate Analytics, 2021).
•Engineering
Engineering covers all aspects of engineering, technology, and applied science. It plays a crucial role in the development of technologies to address some of the world''s biggest challenges, helping to save lives and improve the way we live.
•Physical sciences
Physical sciences are those academic disciplines that aim to uncover the underlying laws of nature — often written in the language of mathematics. It is a collective term for areas of study including astronomy, chemistry, materials science and physics.
•Earth and environmental sciences
Earth and environmental sciences cover all aspects of Earth and planetary science and broadly encompass solid Earth processes, surface and atmospheric dynamics, Earth system history, climate and climate change, marine and freshwater systems, and ecology. It also considers the interactions between humans and these systems.
•Biological sciences
Biological sciences encompass all the divisions of natural sciences examining various aspects of vital processes. The concept includes anatomy, physiology, cell biology, biochemistry and biophysics, and covers all organisms from microorganisms, animals to plants.
•Health sciences
The health sciences study health, disease and healthcare. This field of study aims to develop knowledge, interventions and technology for use in healthcare to improve the treatment of patients.