Thi-My-Duyen Ngo, Thi Kim Ngan Tran, Thi Minh Thu Le, Mong Kha Tran, Huu Son Nguyen, Huy Truong Nguyen, Kim Long Vu-Huynh
{"title":"HPLC-PDA/ELSD单标记法同时测定越南参中主要皂苷的含量。","authors":"Thi-My-Duyen Ngo, Thi Kim Ngan Tran, Thi Minh Thu Le, Mong Kha Tran, Huu Son Nguyen, Huy Truong Nguyen, Kim Long Vu-Huynh","doi":"10.3390/metabo15070419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The Quantitative Analysis of Multi-components by Single-marker (QAMS) method has been developed as an alternative to the External Standards Method (ESM) for the quality control of medicinal herbs. <b>Objectives</b>: In this study, QAMS was developed to determine saponins in the raw materials of <i>Panax vietnamensis</i> using HPLC-PDA/ELSD. <b>Methods</b>: The method was developed and validated. The relative conversion factors F<sub>x</sub> were calculated based on the linear regression for HPLC-PDA and the logarithm equation for HPLC-ELSD. The Standard Method Difference (SMD) was determined to indicate the difference in the results of QAMS and EMS. <b>Results</b>: Relative conversion factors (F<sub>x</sub>) were determined for each detector to quantify five saponins (ginsenoside Rb<sub>1</sub>, Rd, Rg<sub>1</sub>, majnoside R2, and vina-ginsenoside R2) in VG root. The F<sub>x</sub> values were calculated based on the ratio of the slopes of the regression equations of a single standard and an external standard. For HPLC-PDA, G-Rb1 was used as a single standard with the F<sub>x</sub> values of 1.00 (G-Rb<sub>1</sub>), 1.08 (G-Rd), 1.32 (G-Rg<sub>1</sub>), and 0.04 (M-R2). For HPLC-ELSD, G-Rb<sub>1</sub> was used for determining the content of G-Rg<sub>1</sub> and G-Rb<sub>1</sub> with the F<sub>x</sub> values of 1.00 (G-Rb<sub>1</sub>) and 0.95 (G-Rg<sub>1</sub>), while M-R2 was used for quantitating M-R2 and V-R2 with F<sub>x</sub> of 1.00 (M-R2) and 1.05 (V-R2). An SMD value less than 5.00% confirms the close alignment of the QAMS method with ESM. <b>Conclusions</b>: The QAMS method proved to be a feasible and promising method for the quality control of <i>P. vietnamensis</i>.</p>","PeriodicalId":18496,"journal":{"name":"Metabolites","volume":"15 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Simultaneous Quantification of Main Saponins in <i>Panax vietnamensis</i> by HPLC-PDA/ELSD Using the Quantitative Analysis of Multi-Components by Single-Marker Method.\",\"authors\":\"Thi-My-Duyen Ngo, Thi Kim Ngan Tran, Thi Minh Thu Le, Mong Kha Tran, Huu Son Nguyen, Huy Truong Nguyen, Kim Long Vu-Huynh\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/metabo15070419\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background</b>: The Quantitative Analysis of Multi-components by Single-marker (QAMS) method has been developed as an alternative to the External Standards Method (ESM) for the quality control of medicinal herbs. <b>Objectives</b>: In this study, QAMS was developed to determine saponins in the raw materials of <i>Panax vietnamensis</i> using HPLC-PDA/ELSD. <b>Methods</b>: The method was developed and validated. The relative conversion factors F<sub>x</sub> were calculated based on the linear regression for HPLC-PDA and the logarithm equation for HPLC-ELSD. The Standard Method Difference (SMD) was determined to indicate the difference in the results of QAMS and EMS. <b>Results</b>: Relative conversion factors (F<sub>x</sub>) were determined for each detector to quantify five saponins (ginsenoside Rb<sub>1</sub>, Rd, Rg<sub>1</sub>, majnoside R2, and vina-ginsenoside R2) in VG root. The F<sub>x</sub> values were calculated based on the ratio of the slopes of the regression equations of a single standard and an external standard. For HPLC-PDA, G-Rb1 was used as a single standard with the F<sub>x</sub> values of 1.00 (G-Rb<sub>1</sub>), 1.08 (G-Rd), 1.32 (G-Rg<sub>1</sub>), and 0.04 (M-R2). For HPLC-ELSD, G-Rb<sub>1</sub> was used for determining the content of G-Rg<sub>1</sub> and G-Rb<sub>1</sub> with the F<sub>x</sub> values of 1.00 (G-Rb<sub>1</sub>) and 0.95 (G-Rg<sub>1</sub>), while M-R2 was used for quantitating M-R2 and V-R2 with F<sub>x</sub> of 1.00 (M-R2) and 1.05 (V-R2). An SMD value less than 5.00% confirms the close alignment of the QAMS method with ESM. <b>Conclusions</b>: The QAMS method proved to be a feasible and promising method for the quality control of <i>P. vietnamensis</i>.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Metabolites\",\"volume\":\"15 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Metabolites\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15070419\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Metabolites","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/metabo15070419","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Simultaneous Quantification of Main Saponins in Panax vietnamensis by HPLC-PDA/ELSD Using the Quantitative Analysis of Multi-Components by Single-Marker Method.
Background: The Quantitative Analysis of Multi-components by Single-marker (QAMS) method has been developed as an alternative to the External Standards Method (ESM) for the quality control of medicinal herbs. Objectives: In this study, QAMS was developed to determine saponins in the raw materials of Panax vietnamensis using HPLC-PDA/ELSD. Methods: The method was developed and validated. The relative conversion factors Fx were calculated based on the linear regression for HPLC-PDA and the logarithm equation for HPLC-ELSD. The Standard Method Difference (SMD) was determined to indicate the difference in the results of QAMS and EMS. Results: Relative conversion factors (Fx) were determined for each detector to quantify five saponins (ginsenoside Rb1, Rd, Rg1, majnoside R2, and vina-ginsenoside R2) in VG root. The Fx values were calculated based on the ratio of the slopes of the regression equations of a single standard and an external standard. For HPLC-PDA, G-Rb1 was used as a single standard with the Fx values of 1.00 (G-Rb1), 1.08 (G-Rd), 1.32 (G-Rg1), and 0.04 (M-R2). For HPLC-ELSD, G-Rb1 was used for determining the content of G-Rg1 and G-Rb1 with the Fx values of 1.00 (G-Rb1) and 0.95 (G-Rg1), while M-R2 was used for quantitating M-R2 and V-R2 with Fx of 1.00 (M-R2) and 1.05 (V-R2). An SMD value less than 5.00% confirms the close alignment of the QAMS method with ESM. Conclusions: The QAMS method proved to be a feasible and promising method for the quality control of P. vietnamensis.
MetabolitesBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1070
审稿时长
17.17 days
期刊介绍:
Metabolites (ISSN 2218-1989) is an international, peer-reviewed open access journal of metabolism and metabolomics. Metabolites publishes original research articles and review articles in all molecular aspects of metabolism relevant to the fields of metabolomics, metabolic biochemistry, computational and systems biology, biotechnology and medicine, with a particular focus on the biological roles of metabolites and small molecule biomarkers. Metabolites encourages scientists to publish their experimental and theoretical results in as much detail as possible. Therefore, there is no restriction on article length. Sufficient experimental details must be provided to enable the results to be accurately reproduced. Electronic material representing additional figures, materials and methods explanation, or supporting results and evidence can be submitted with the main manuscript as supplementary material.