TAVR术后感染性心内膜炎的外科与内科治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Dimitrios E Magouliotis, Serge Sicouri, Massimo Baudo, Francesco Cabrucci, Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Basel Ramlawi
{"title":"TAVR术后感染性心内膜炎的外科与内科治疗:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Dimitrios E Magouliotis, Serge Sicouri, Massimo Baudo, Francesco Cabrucci, Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Basel Ramlawi","doi":"10.3390/jcdd12070263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR-IE) is a rare but severe complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. The optimal treatment strategy-surgical explantation versus medical therapy-remains uncertain, particularly given the technical demands of TAVR removal and the advanced age of many affected patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the surgical and medical management of TAVR-IE. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality and 1-year survival. Secondary analyses explored microbiological profiles, patient demographics, prosthesis type, postoperative complications, and surgical indications. A qualitative synthesis of surgical explantation techniques and reconstructive strategies was also performed based on recent consensus recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies comprising 1557 patients with TAVR-IE were included; 155 (10.0%) underwent surgical treatment. Thirty-day mortality was comparable between groups (surgical: 9.7%; medical: 8.4%), while the pooled odds ratio for one-year survival did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 0.36-10.22; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 88%). However, single-center outcomes demonstrated markedly improved survival with surgery (96% vs. 51%). The most common surgical indications included severe valvular dysfunction (50.3%), aortic root abscess (26.5%), and large vegetations (21.3%), in line with current guideline recommendations. Postoperative complications included acute renal failure (10%) and longer hospitalizations (19.8 vs. 18 days), although these were not statistically different. Contemporary explant strategies-such as the Double Kocher, Tourniquet, and Y-incision aortic enlargement techniques-were highlighted as critical tools for surgical success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While underutilized, surgical intervention for TAVR-IE may offer significant survival benefits in select patients, particularly when guided by established indications and performed at high-volume centers. Outcomes depend heavily on timing, surgical expertise, and appropriate patient selection. As TAVR expands to younger populations, TAVR-IE will become increasingly relevant, necessitating early multidisciplinary involvement and broader familiarity with advanced explant techniques among cardiac surgeons.</p>","PeriodicalId":15197,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","volume":"12 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Surgical vs. Medical Management of Infective Endocarditis Following TAVR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Dimitrios E Magouliotis, Serge Sicouri, Massimo Baudo, Francesco Cabrucci, Yoshiyuki Yamashita, Basel Ramlawi\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/jcdd12070263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR-IE) is a rare but severe complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. The optimal treatment strategy-surgical explantation versus medical therapy-remains uncertain, particularly given the technical demands of TAVR removal and the advanced age of many affected patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the surgical and medical management of TAVR-IE. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality and 1-year survival. Secondary analyses explored microbiological profiles, patient demographics, prosthesis type, postoperative complications, and surgical indications. A qualitative synthesis of surgical explantation techniques and reconstructive strategies was also performed based on recent consensus recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three studies comprising 1557 patients with TAVR-IE were included; 155 (10.0%) underwent surgical treatment. Thirty-day mortality was comparable between groups (surgical: 9.7%; medical: 8.4%), while the pooled odds ratio for one-year survival did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 0.36-10.22; <i>I</i><sup>2</sup> = 88%). However, single-center outcomes demonstrated markedly improved survival with surgery (96% vs. 51%). The most common surgical indications included severe valvular dysfunction (50.3%), aortic root abscess (26.5%), and large vegetations (21.3%), in line with current guideline recommendations. Postoperative complications included acute renal failure (10%) and longer hospitalizations (19.8 vs. 18 days), although these were not statistically different. Contemporary explant strategies-such as the Double Kocher, Tourniquet, and Y-incision aortic enlargement techniques-were highlighted as critical tools for surgical success.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While underutilized, surgical intervention for TAVR-IE may offer significant survival benefits in select patients, particularly when guided by established indications and performed at high-volume centers. Outcomes depend heavily on timing, surgical expertise, and appropriate patient selection. As TAVR expands to younger populations, TAVR-IE will become increasingly relevant, necessitating early multidisciplinary involvement and broader familiarity with advanced explant techniques among cardiac surgeons.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15197,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"volume\":\"12 7\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12070263\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd12070263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:经导管主动脉瓣置换术后感染性心内膜炎(TAVR-IE)是一种罕见但严重的并发症,具有很高的发病率和死亡率。最佳的治疗策略是手术移植还是药物治疗仍然不确定,特别是考虑到TAVR切除的技术要求和许多受影响患者的高龄。方法:我们对比较TAVR-IE手术和内科治疗的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。主要结局包括30天死亡率和1年生存率。二次分析探讨了微生物谱、患者人口统计学、假体类型、术后并发症和手术指征。定性的综合手术的外植体技术和重建策略也进行了基于最近的共识建议。结果:3项研究纳入1557例TAVR-IE患者;155例(10.0%)接受手术治疗。两组间30天死亡率相当(手术:9.7%;医学:8.4%),而1年生存率的合并优势比没有达到统计学意义(OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 0.36-10.22;I2 = 88%)。然而,单中心结果显示手术显著提高了生存率(96%对51%)。最常见的手术指征包括严重瓣膜功能障碍(50.3%)、主动脉根部脓肿(26.5%)和大面积植被(21.3%),符合目前的指南建议。术后并发症包括急性肾功能衰竭(10%)和住院时间较长(19.8天对18天),尽管这些没有统计学差异。当代的移植策略,如双Kocher,止血带和y切口主动脉扩张技术,被强调为手术成功的关键工具。结论:虽然TAVR-IE的手术治疗未得到充分利用,但在特定患者中,特别是在已建立的适应症指导下并在大容量中心进行手术治疗时,手术治疗可能会显著提高生存率。结果在很大程度上取决于时机、手术专业知识和适当的患者选择。随着TAVR扩展到更年轻的人群,TAVR- ie将变得越来越重要,需要心脏外科医生早期多学科参与和更广泛地熟悉先进的外植体技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Surgical vs. Medical Management of Infective Endocarditis Following TAVR: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background: Infective endocarditis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR-IE) is a rare but severe complication associated with high morbidity and mortality. The optimal treatment strategy-surgical explantation versus medical therapy-remains uncertain, particularly given the technical demands of TAVR removal and the advanced age of many affected patients.

Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies comparing the surgical and medical management of TAVR-IE. Primary outcomes included 30-day mortality and 1-year survival. Secondary analyses explored microbiological profiles, patient demographics, prosthesis type, postoperative complications, and surgical indications. A qualitative synthesis of surgical explantation techniques and reconstructive strategies was also performed based on recent consensus recommendations.

Results: Three studies comprising 1557 patients with TAVR-IE were included; 155 (10.0%) underwent surgical treatment. Thirty-day mortality was comparable between groups (surgical: 9.7%; medical: 8.4%), while the pooled odds ratio for one-year survival did not reach statistical significance (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 0.36-10.22; I2 = 88%). However, single-center outcomes demonstrated markedly improved survival with surgery (96% vs. 51%). The most common surgical indications included severe valvular dysfunction (50.3%), aortic root abscess (26.5%), and large vegetations (21.3%), in line with current guideline recommendations. Postoperative complications included acute renal failure (10%) and longer hospitalizations (19.8 vs. 18 days), although these were not statistically different. Contemporary explant strategies-such as the Double Kocher, Tourniquet, and Y-incision aortic enlargement techniques-were highlighted as critical tools for surgical success.

Conclusions: While underutilized, surgical intervention for TAVR-IE may offer significant survival benefits in select patients, particularly when guided by established indications and performed at high-volume centers. Outcomes depend heavily on timing, surgical expertise, and appropriate patient selection. As TAVR expands to younger populations, TAVR-IE will become increasingly relevant, necessitating early multidisciplinary involvement and broader familiarity with advanced explant techniques among cardiac surgeons.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
381
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信