心脏病患者的死亡焦虑:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Amirabbas Mollaei, Vahid Zamanzadeh, Fatemeh Ranjbar Noei, Mahsa Kamali
{"title":"心脏病患者的死亡焦虑:一项系统回顾和荟萃分析。","authors":"Amirabbas Mollaei, Vahid Zamanzadeh, Fatemeh Ranjbar Noei, Mahsa Kamali","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119967","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Death anxiety (DA) is a critical psychological concern among patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), yet its prevalence and associated factors remain understudied. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the level of DA in cardiac patients and identify contributing factors. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar yielded 27 cross-sectional studies (5292 participants). Studies were assessed using the AXIS tool, with most rated as high quality. Pooled estimates revealed moderate DA levels across studies, with mean scores of 8.46 (95 % CI: 7.05-9.86) for the Templer Death Anxiety Scale (TDAS) 0-15 range and 45.07 (95 % CI: 34.59-55.55) for the 15-75 range. Subgroup analyses indicated higher DA in Turkey (vs. Iran) and among coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. Key factors linked to elevated DA included female gender, younger age, economic hardship, unemployment, reduced resilience, and diminished religious beliefs. Meta-regression found no significant moderation by age, sample size, or gender. These findings determine the need for targeted psychological interventions addressing modifiable factors like socioeconomic support and resilience-building in cardiac care. Limitations include reliance on cross-sectional data and heterogeneity in measurement tools. Future research should explore longitudinal and culturally diverse cohorts to clarify causal relationships and optimize DA management strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":14963,"journal":{"name":"Journal of affective disorders","volume":" ","pages":"119967"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cardiac patients' death anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Amirabbas Mollaei, Vahid Zamanzadeh, Fatemeh Ranjbar Noei, Mahsa Kamali\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jad.2025.119967\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Death anxiety (DA) is a critical psychological concern among patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), yet its prevalence and associated factors remain understudied. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the level of DA in cardiac patients and identify contributing factors. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar yielded 27 cross-sectional studies (5292 participants). Studies were assessed using the AXIS tool, with most rated as high quality. Pooled estimates revealed moderate DA levels across studies, with mean scores of 8.46 (95 % CI: 7.05-9.86) for the Templer Death Anxiety Scale (TDAS) 0-15 range and 45.07 (95 % CI: 34.59-55.55) for the 15-75 range. Subgroup analyses indicated higher DA in Turkey (vs. Iran) and among coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. Key factors linked to elevated DA included female gender, younger age, economic hardship, unemployment, reduced resilience, and diminished religious beliefs. Meta-regression found no significant moderation by age, sample size, or gender. These findings determine the need for targeted psychological interventions addressing modifiable factors like socioeconomic support and resilience-building in cardiac care. Limitations include reliance on cross-sectional data and heterogeneity in measurement tools. Future research should explore longitudinal and culturally diverse cohorts to clarify causal relationships and optimize DA management strategies.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14963,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"119967\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of affective disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.119967\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of affective disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2025.119967","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

死亡焦虑(DA)是心血管疾病(cvd)患者的一个重要心理问题,但其患病率及其相关因素仍未得到充分研究。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定心脏病患者的DA水平并确定影响因素。对PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和b谷歌Scholar的全面搜索产生了27项横断面研究(5292名参与者)。使用AXIS工具对研究进行评估,大多数研究被评为高质量。汇总估计显示,所有研究的DA水平中等,Templer死亡焦虑量表(TDAS) 0-15范围的平均得分为8.46(95 % CI: 7.05-9.86), 15-75范围的平均得分为45.07(95 % CI: 34.59-55.55)。亚组分析显示,土耳其(与伊朗相比)和冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)患者的DA更高。与DA升高相关的关键因素包括女性、年轻、经济困难、失业、恢复能力下降和宗教信仰减弱。meta回归发现年龄、样本量或性别没有显著的调节作用。这些发现决定了有针对性的心理干预需要解决可改变的因素,如社会经济支持和心脏护理的恢复力建设。限制包括对横断面数据的依赖和测量工具的异质性。未来的研究应探索纵向和文化多样性的队列,以澄清因果关系,优化DA管理策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Cardiac patients' death anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Death anxiety (DA) is a critical psychological concern among patients with cardiovascular diseases (CVDs), yet its prevalence and associated factors remain understudied. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the level of DA in cardiac patients and identify contributing factors. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar yielded 27 cross-sectional studies (5292 participants). Studies were assessed using the AXIS tool, with most rated as high quality. Pooled estimates revealed moderate DA levels across studies, with mean scores of 8.46 (95 % CI: 7.05-9.86) for the Templer Death Anxiety Scale (TDAS) 0-15 range and 45.07 (95 % CI: 34.59-55.55) for the 15-75 range. Subgroup analyses indicated higher DA in Turkey (vs. Iran) and among coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients. Key factors linked to elevated DA included female gender, younger age, economic hardship, unemployment, reduced resilience, and diminished religious beliefs. Meta-regression found no significant moderation by age, sample size, or gender. These findings determine the need for targeted psychological interventions addressing modifiable factors like socioeconomic support and resilience-building in cardiac care. Limitations include reliance on cross-sectional data and heterogeneity in measurement tools. Future research should explore longitudinal and culturally diverse cohorts to clarify causal relationships and optimize DA management strategies.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of affective disorders
Journal of affective disorders 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.10%
发文量
1319
审稿时长
9.3 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Affective Disorders publishes papers concerned with affective disorders in the widest sense: depression, mania, mood spectrum, emotions and personality, anxiety and stress. It is interdisciplinary and aims to bring together different approaches for a diverse readership. Top quality papers will be accepted dealing with any aspect of affective disorders, including neuroimaging, cognitive neurosciences, genetics, molecular biology, experimental and clinical neurosciences, pharmacology, neuroimmunoendocrinology, intervention and treatment trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信