在日本人口中实施气动视网膜固定术。

IF 1.9 3区 医学 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Kunihiko Akiyama, Takaaki Matsuki, Ken Watanabe, Aurora Pecaku, Sumana Naidu, Rajeev H Muni
{"title":"在日本人口中实施气动视网膜固定术。","authors":"Kunihiko Akiyama, Takaaki Matsuki, Ken Watanabe, Aurora Pecaku, Sumana Naidu, Rajeev H Muni","doi":"10.1007/s10384-025-01241-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose an implementation model for pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) in a region where PnR is performed infrequently, and to assess its impact on treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 222 consecutive eyes with primary RRD treated from July 2017 to September 2023 at a tertiary care center in Japan. The treatment methods utilized included pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckling (SB) and PnR. The surgeon learned PnR through social media. Primary anatomic reattachment rate (PARR) and visual acuity outcomes were compared between the pre-PnR (prior to the implementation; 110 eyes) and post-PnR (after the implementation; 112 eyes) periods, as well as between PnR and PPV in the post-PnR period. PARR for PnR was also evaluated based on RRD characteristics and gas injection frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the post-PnR period PnR was performed in 53.6% (60/112)of cases. The PARR was similar in the pre-PnR (97.3%) and post-PnR (93.8%) periods (P=.33). Visual outcomes were similar both across periods and between PnR and PPV at 3, 6 and 12 month post-operatively. The PARR for PnR was 88.3% overall, 90.5% in eyes meeting the Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT) criteria, 93.3% in eyes with a single break and 100% in eyes with a single break meeting PIVOT criteria. Eyes with a single gas injection had higher PARR than eyes requiring an additional gas injection (93.5% vs. 71.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote-learning utilizing social media effectively enabled PnR implementation with favorable anatomic and functional outcomes in a real-world setting in Japan.</p>","PeriodicalId":14563,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of pneumatic retinopexy in the Japanese population.\",\"authors\":\"Kunihiko Akiyama, Takaaki Matsuki, Ken Watanabe, Aurora Pecaku, Sumana Naidu, Rajeev H Muni\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s10384-025-01241-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To propose an implementation model for pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) in a region where PnR is performed infrequently, and to assess its impact on treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective case series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We reviewed 222 consecutive eyes with primary RRD treated from July 2017 to September 2023 at a tertiary care center in Japan. The treatment methods utilized included pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckling (SB) and PnR. The surgeon learned PnR through social media. Primary anatomic reattachment rate (PARR) and visual acuity outcomes were compared between the pre-PnR (prior to the implementation; 110 eyes) and post-PnR (after the implementation; 112 eyes) periods, as well as between PnR and PPV in the post-PnR period. PARR for PnR was also evaluated based on RRD characteristics and gas injection frequency.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the post-PnR period PnR was performed in 53.6% (60/112)of cases. The PARR was similar in the pre-PnR (97.3%) and post-PnR (93.8%) periods (P=.33). Visual outcomes were similar both across periods and between PnR and PPV at 3, 6 and 12 month post-operatively. The PARR for PnR was 88.3% overall, 90.5% in eyes meeting the Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT) criteria, 93.3% in eyes with a single break and 100% in eyes with a single break meeting PIVOT criteria. Eyes with a single gas injection had higher PARR than eyes requiring an additional gas injection (93.5% vs. 71.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote-learning utilizing social media effectively enabled PnR implementation with favorable anatomic and functional outcomes in a real-world setting in Japan.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01241-z\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"OPHTHALMOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-025-01241-z","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:在不常进行视网膜固定术(PnR)的地区提出一种实施模式,并评估其对孔源性视网膜脱离(RRD)治疗的影响。研究设计:回顾性病例系列。方法:我们回顾了2017年7月至2023年9月在日本一家三级保健中心连续治疗的222只原发性RRD眼睛。治疗方法包括玻璃体切割(PPV)、巩膜屈曲(SB)和PnR。这位外科医生通过社交媒体了解了PnR。比较pnr术前(实施前;110眼)和后pnr(实施后;112眼)期间,以及PnR期和PnR期后的PPV之间。根据RRD特征和注气频率对PnR的PARR进行了评价。结果:术后行PnR的患者占53.6%(60/112)。pnr前(97.3%)和pnr后(93.8%)的PARR相似(P= 0.33)。术后3个月、6个月和12个月,PnR和PPV之间的视觉结果相似。PnR的总体PARR为88.3%,在符合原发性孔源性视网膜脱离结局随机试验(PIVOT)标准的眼睛中为90.5%,在单一破裂的眼睛中为93.3%,而在单一破裂符合PIVOT标准的眼睛中为100%。单次气体注射的眼睛的PARR高于需要额外气体注射的眼睛(93.5%对71.4%)。结论:在日本的现实环境中,利用社交媒体的远程学习有效地使PnR的实施具有良好的解剖和功能结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of pneumatic retinopexy in the Japanese population.

Purpose: To propose an implementation model for pneumatic retinopexy (PnR) in a region where PnR is performed infrequently, and to assess its impact on treatment of rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD).

Study design: Retrospective case series.

Methods: We reviewed 222 consecutive eyes with primary RRD treated from July 2017 to September 2023 at a tertiary care center in Japan. The treatment methods utilized included pars plana vitrectomy (PPV), scleral buckling (SB) and PnR. The surgeon learned PnR through social media. Primary anatomic reattachment rate (PARR) and visual acuity outcomes were compared between the pre-PnR (prior to the implementation; 110 eyes) and post-PnR (after the implementation; 112 eyes) periods, as well as between PnR and PPV in the post-PnR period. PARR for PnR was also evaluated based on RRD characteristics and gas injection frequency.

Results: In the post-PnR period PnR was performed in 53.6% (60/112)of cases. The PARR was similar in the pre-PnR (97.3%) and post-PnR (93.8%) periods (P=.33). Visual outcomes were similar both across periods and between PnR and PPV at 3, 6 and 12 month post-operatively. The PARR for PnR was 88.3% overall, 90.5% in eyes meeting the Primary Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment Outcomes Randomized Trial (PIVOT) criteria, 93.3% in eyes with a single break and 100% in eyes with a single break meeting PIVOT criteria. Eyes with a single gas injection had higher PARR than eyes requiring an additional gas injection (93.5% vs. 71.4%).

Conclusion: Remote-learning utilizing social media effectively enabled PnR implementation with favorable anatomic and functional outcomes in a real-world setting in Japan.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
65
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology (JJO) was inaugurated in 1957 as a quarterly journal published in English by the Ophthalmology Department of the University of Tokyo, with the aim of disseminating the achievements of Japanese ophthalmologists worldwide. JJO remains the only Japanese ophthalmology journal published in English. In 1997, the Japanese Ophthalmological Society assumed the responsibility for publishing the Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology as its official English-language publication. Currently the journal is published bimonthly and accepts papers from authors worldwide. JJO has become an international interdisciplinary forum for the publication of basic science and clinical research papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信