奥运和传统划船力学在不同划速下的运动学分析。

Q1 Health Professions
International journal of exercise science Pub Date : 2025-06-01 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.70252/RFXJ1471
Alfonso Penichet-Tomas, Sergio Calavia-Carbajal, Basilio Pueo, Lamberto Villalon-Gasch
{"title":"奥运和传统划船力学在不同划速下的运动学分析。","authors":"Alfonso Penichet-Tomas, Sergio Calavia-Carbajal, Basilio Pueo, Lamberto Villalon-Gasch","doi":"10.70252/RFXJ1471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Rowing requires strength, endurance, and technique, where stroke efficiency depends on body mechanics, movement sequencing, and stroke rate, which impact speed transfer. This cross-sectional study investigates the role of kinematic differences in stroke mechanics as a key component of performance analysis in Olympic and Traditional rowing. Thirteen elite national-level female rowers (age: 26.9 ± 5.1 years; body mass: 60.6 ± 6.9 kg; height: 166.7 ± 6.7 cm) performed three stroke-rate conditions on two ergometer setups: an Olympic rowing ergometer and a modified ergometer with a static seat replicating Traditional rowing. The stroke rates included 18 spm (120 s), 24 spm (100 s), and 30 spm (60 s), with 2-minute rest intervals between sets. Kinematic data, including leg and trunk angles at the catch and finish, as well as leg, trunk, and arm velocities, were captured using an automated analysis system. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant interactions between rowing modality and stroke rate for leg catch angle (<i>η</i> <i><sup>2</sup></i> =0.254; <i>p</i>=0.05), trunk finish angle (<i>η</i> <i><sup>2</sup></i> =0.352; <i>p</i>=0.013), leg velocity (<i>η</i> <i><sup>2</sup></i> =0.624; <i>p</i><0.001), trunk velocity (<i>η</i> <i><sup>2</sup></i> =0.665; <i>p</i><0.001), and arm velocity (<i>η</i> <i><sup>2</sup></i> =0.348; <i>p</i>=0.014). These findings emphasize distinct biomechanical patterns between modalities, which are crucial for technical optimization and individualized training. Performance analysis of angles and velocities provides valuable insights into improving rowing efficiency and addressing technical deficiencies in each modality.</p>","PeriodicalId":14171,"journal":{"name":"International journal of exercise science","volume":"18 7","pages":"610-621"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289236/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Kinematic Analysis of Olympic and Traditional Rowing Mechanics at different Stroke Rates.\",\"authors\":\"Alfonso Penichet-Tomas, Sergio Calavia-Carbajal, Basilio Pueo, Lamberto Villalon-Gasch\",\"doi\":\"10.70252/RFXJ1471\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Rowing requires strength, endurance, and technique, where stroke efficiency depends on body mechanics, movement sequencing, and stroke rate, which impact speed transfer. This cross-sectional study investigates the role of kinematic differences in stroke mechanics as a key component of performance analysis in Olympic and Traditional rowing. Thirteen elite national-level female rowers (age: 26.9 ± 5.1 years; body mass: 60.6 ± 6.9 kg; height: 166.7 ± 6.7 cm) performed three stroke-rate conditions on two ergometer setups: an Olympic rowing ergometer and a modified ergometer with a static seat replicating Traditional rowing. The stroke rates included 18 spm (120 s), 24 spm (100 s), and 30 spm (60 s), with 2-minute rest intervals between sets. Kinematic data, including leg and trunk angles at the catch and finish, as well as leg, trunk, and arm velocities, were captured using an automated analysis system. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant interactions between rowing modality and stroke rate for leg catch angle (<i>η</i> <i><sup>2</sup></i> =0.254; <i>p</i>=0.05), trunk finish angle (<i>η</i> <i><sup>2</sup></i> =0.352; <i>p</i>=0.013), leg velocity (<i>η</i> <i><sup>2</sup></i> =0.624; <i>p</i><0.001), trunk velocity (<i>η</i> <i><sup>2</sup></i> =0.665; <i>p</i><0.001), and arm velocity (<i>η</i> <i><sup>2</sup></i> =0.348; <i>p</i>=0.014). These findings emphasize distinct biomechanical patterns between modalities, which are crucial for technical optimization and individualized training. Performance analysis of angles and velocities provides valuable insights into improving rowing efficiency and addressing technical deficiencies in each modality.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":14171,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"volume\":\"18 7\",\"pages\":\"610-621\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12289236/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of exercise science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.70252/RFXJ1471\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Health Professions\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of exercise science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.70252/RFXJ1471","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

赛艇需要力量、耐力和技术,其中划水效率取决于身体力学、运动顺序和划水速度,这影响速度转移。这项横断面研究调查了运动差异在划水力学中的作用,作为奥运会和传统赛艇性能分析的关键组成部分。国家级优秀女子赛艇运动员13名(年龄:26.9±5.1岁;体重:60.6±6.9 kg;身高:166.7±6.7 cm)在两种测力计设置上进行了三种冲程率条件的测试:一种是奥林匹克赛艇测力计,另一种是带有复制传统赛艇静态座椅的改进测力计。中风率包括18个每分钟(120秒)、24个每分钟(100秒)和30个每分钟(60秒),两组之间休息2分钟。运动学数据,包括腿和躯干在接球和结束时的角度,以及腿、躯干和手臂的速度,都是通过自动分析系统捕获的。双向重复测量方差分析显示,划船方式与腿抓角划水率之间存在显著的交互作用(η 2 =0.254;P =0.05),树干光洁度角(η 2 =0.352;P =0.013),腿速度(η 2 =0.624;Pη 2 =0.665;Pη 2 =0.348;p = 0.014)。这些发现强调了不同训练方式之间不同的生物力学模式,这对于技术优化和个性化训练至关重要。角度和速度的性能分析为提高划船效率和解决每种模式的技术缺陷提供了有价值的见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Kinematic Analysis of Olympic and Traditional Rowing Mechanics at different Stroke Rates.

Kinematic Analysis of Olympic and Traditional Rowing Mechanics at different Stroke Rates.

Kinematic Analysis of Olympic and Traditional Rowing Mechanics at different Stroke Rates.

Kinematic Analysis of Olympic and Traditional Rowing Mechanics at different Stroke Rates.

Rowing requires strength, endurance, and technique, where stroke efficiency depends on body mechanics, movement sequencing, and stroke rate, which impact speed transfer. This cross-sectional study investigates the role of kinematic differences in stroke mechanics as a key component of performance analysis in Olympic and Traditional rowing. Thirteen elite national-level female rowers (age: 26.9 ± 5.1 years; body mass: 60.6 ± 6.9 kg; height: 166.7 ± 6.7 cm) performed three stroke-rate conditions on two ergometer setups: an Olympic rowing ergometer and a modified ergometer with a static seat replicating Traditional rowing. The stroke rates included 18 spm (120 s), 24 spm (100 s), and 30 spm (60 s), with 2-minute rest intervals between sets. Kinematic data, including leg and trunk angles at the catch and finish, as well as leg, trunk, and arm velocities, were captured using an automated analysis system. A two-way repeated measures ANOVA revealed significant interactions between rowing modality and stroke rate for leg catch angle (η 2 =0.254; p=0.05), trunk finish angle (η 2 =0.352; p=0.013), leg velocity (η 2 =0.624; p<0.001), trunk velocity (η 2 =0.665; p<0.001), and arm velocity (η 2 =0.348; p=0.014). These findings emphasize distinct biomechanical patterns between modalities, which are crucial for technical optimization and individualized training. Performance analysis of angles and velocities provides valuable insights into improving rowing efficiency and addressing technical deficiencies in each modality.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International journal of exercise science
International journal of exercise science Health Professions-Occupational Therapy
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
审稿时长
26 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信