治疗儿童期系统性红斑狼疮的新药:欧盟对儿科药物开发的看法。

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Frontiers in Medicine Pub Date : 2025-07-10 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3389/fmed.2025.1583140
Roberto De Lisa, Fernando de Andres-Trelles, Ralph Bax, Sara Galluzzo, Brian Alward, Andrew Thomson, Dominik Karres, Hermine I Brunner, Nicolino Ruperto, Gunter F Egger
{"title":"治疗儿童期系统性红斑狼疮的新药:欧盟对儿科药物开发的看法。","authors":"Roberto De Lisa, Fernando de Andres-Trelles, Ralph Bax, Sara Galluzzo, Brian Alward, Andrew Thomson, Dominik Karres, Hermine I Brunner, Nicolino Ruperto, Gunter F Egger","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2025.1583140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE, also known as juvenile or paediatric SLE) is a severe autoimmune disease affecting multiple organs and systems, with higher morbidity and severity compared to adult SLE (aSLE). The European Union's Paediatric Regulation No. 1901/2006 mandates the agreement of a paediatric investigation plan (PIP) for new investigational medicinal products (IMPs) to ensure reliable efficacy and safety data for paediatric indications. This study examined the experience of the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in assessing PIPs for cSLE, highlighting the challenges and potential solutions in the planning of development of novel agents in this disease and providing the academia point of view on key points of cSLE medicines development. Regulatory requirements so far have been rather consistent when a PIP is agreed, and recommend randomised controlled trials to enable a full benefit-risk assessment. However, PIPs are agreed when adult efficacy data are not yet available and as soon as the product lifecycle progresses, new methods and approaches can offer some advantages over randomised controlled trials in this setting and might provide a comparable level of evidence of efficacy in an alternative way. Extrapolation of adult efficacy data to paediatrics is one possible approach, provided that adult trials produce data that can be used for this purpose and that the degree of residual uncertainty is appropriately quantified for the medicinal product in question. The study also highlights the value of enhanced international cooperation among regulatory authorities, developers, and academic institutions in this field to support collaborative efforts among various stakeholders.</p>","PeriodicalId":12488,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"12 ","pages":"1583140"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New medicines for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: an EU perspective on paediatric drug development.\",\"authors\":\"Roberto De Lisa, Fernando de Andres-Trelles, Ralph Bax, Sara Galluzzo, Brian Alward, Andrew Thomson, Dominik Karres, Hermine I Brunner, Nicolino Ruperto, Gunter F Egger\",\"doi\":\"10.3389/fmed.2025.1583140\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE, also known as juvenile or paediatric SLE) is a severe autoimmune disease affecting multiple organs and systems, with higher morbidity and severity compared to adult SLE (aSLE). The European Union's Paediatric Regulation No. 1901/2006 mandates the agreement of a paediatric investigation plan (PIP) for new investigational medicinal products (IMPs) to ensure reliable efficacy and safety data for paediatric indications. This study examined the experience of the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in assessing PIPs for cSLE, highlighting the challenges and potential solutions in the planning of development of novel agents in this disease and providing the academia point of view on key points of cSLE medicines development. Regulatory requirements so far have been rather consistent when a PIP is agreed, and recommend randomised controlled trials to enable a full benefit-risk assessment. However, PIPs are agreed when adult efficacy data are not yet available and as soon as the product lifecycle progresses, new methods and approaches can offer some advantages over randomised controlled trials in this setting and might provide a comparable level of evidence of efficacy in an alternative way. Extrapolation of adult efficacy data to paediatrics is one possible approach, provided that adult trials produce data that can be used for this purpose and that the degree of residual uncertainty is appropriately quantified for the medicinal product in question. The study also highlights the value of enhanced international cooperation among regulatory authorities, developers, and academic institutions in this field to support collaborative efforts among various stakeholders.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12488,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"volume\":\"12 \",\"pages\":\"1583140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers in Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1583140\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/1/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1583140","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童期全身性红斑狼疮(cSLE),又称少年型或儿童期SLE,是一种影响多器官和系统的严重自身免疫性疾病,与成人SLE (aSLE)相比,发病率和严重程度更高。欧盟第1901/2006号儿科法规要求就新的临床试验药品(imp)达成儿科调查计划(PIP)协议,以确保儿科适应症的可靠疗效和安全性数据。本研究考察了欧洲药品管理局(EMA)儿科委员会(PDCO)评估cle pip的经验,强调了该疾病新药开发规划中的挑战和潜在解决方案,并就cle药物开发的关键点提供了学术界的观点。到目前为止,在商定PIP时,监管要求相当一致,并建议进行随机对照试验,以实现全面的利益风险评估。然而,当成人疗效数据尚未获得时,一旦产品生命周期进展,新的方法和方法可以在这种情况下提供一些优于随机对照试验的优势,并且可能以替代方式提供相当水平的疗效证据。将成人疗效数据外推到儿科是一种可能的方法,前提是成人试验产生的数据可用于这一目的,并且对有关药品的剩余不确定性程度进行了适当量化。该研究还强调了加强监管机构、开发商和学术机构在该领域的国际合作,以支持各利益相关者之间的合作努力的价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
New medicines for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus: an EU perspective on paediatric drug development.

Childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (cSLE, also known as juvenile or paediatric SLE) is a severe autoimmune disease affecting multiple organs and systems, with higher morbidity and severity compared to adult SLE (aSLE). The European Union's Paediatric Regulation No. 1901/2006 mandates the agreement of a paediatric investigation plan (PIP) for new investigational medicinal products (IMPs) to ensure reliable efficacy and safety data for paediatric indications. This study examined the experience of the Paediatric Committee (PDCO) at the European Medicines Agency (EMA) in assessing PIPs for cSLE, highlighting the challenges and potential solutions in the planning of development of novel agents in this disease and providing the academia point of view on key points of cSLE medicines development. Regulatory requirements so far have been rather consistent when a PIP is agreed, and recommend randomised controlled trials to enable a full benefit-risk assessment. However, PIPs are agreed when adult efficacy data are not yet available and as soon as the product lifecycle progresses, new methods and approaches can offer some advantages over randomised controlled trials in this setting and might provide a comparable level of evidence of efficacy in an alternative way. Extrapolation of adult efficacy data to paediatrics is one possible approach, provided that adult trials produce data that can be used for this purpose and that the degree of residual uncertainty is appropriately quantified for the medicinal product in question. The study also highlights the value of enhanced international cooperation among regulatory authorities, developers, and academic institutions in this field to support collaborative efforts among various stakeholders.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Medicine
Frontiers in Medicine Medicine-General Medicine
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
5.10%
发文量
3710
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers in Medicine publishes rigorously peer-reviewed research linking basic research to clinical practice and patient care, as well as translating scientific advances into new therapies and diagnostic tools. Led by an outstanding Editorial Board of international experts, this multidisciplinary open-access journal is at the forefront of disseminating and communicating scientific knowledge and impactful discoveries to researchers, academics, clinicians and the public worldwide. In addition to papers that provide a link between basic research and clinical practice, a particular emphasis is given to studies that are directly relevant to patient care. In this spirit, the journal publishes the latest research results and medical knowledge that facilitate the translation of scientific advances into new therapies or diagnostic tools. The full listing of the Specialty Sections represented by Frontiers in Medicine is as listed below. As well as the established medical disciplines, Frontiers in Medicine is launching new sections that together will facilitate - the use of patient-reported outcomes under real world conditions - the exploitation of big data and the use of novel information and communication tools in the assessment of new medicines - the scientific bases for guidelines and decisions from regulatory authorities - access to medicinal products and medical devices worldwide - addressing the grand health challenges around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信