当被问及描述与经验时,幼儿在顺序问题上的表现差异

IF 1.8 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL
Breanne E. Wylie, Deborah Z. Kamliot, Thomas D. Lyon, J. Zoe Klemfuss
{"title":"当被问及描述与经验时,幼儿在顺序问题上的表现差异","authors":"Breanne E. Wylie,&nbsp;Deborah Z. Kamliot,&nbsp;Thomas D. Lyon,&nbsp;J. Zoe Klemfuss","doi":"10.1002/acp.70101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Children's understanding of the temporal terms “first,” “before,” and “after” has implications for describing experienced events, but has typically been studied by asking them to interpret described events. In this study, one hundred and one 3- to 6-year-olds completed two tasks. In the description task, children heard sequences described using temporal terms in forward (X before Y/after X, Y) or backward order (before Y, X/Y after X) and were asked what happened “first.” Children exhibited an order of mention bias, performing better in forward order, with no difference on “before” and “after.” In the experience task, children observed sequences and answered questions using temporal terms, with “before” and “after” asked both in forward (what happened before X?/after X, what happened?) and backward order (before X, what happened?/what happened after X?). Order made no difference. Children exhibited a forward order bias, performing better on “after” than “before,” and younger children performed best on “first.”</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48281,"journal":{"name":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","volume":"39 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in Young Children's Performance on Sequencing Questions When Asked About Descriptions Versus Their Experience\",\"authors\":\"Breanne E. Wylie,&nbsp;Deborah Z. Kamliot,&nbsp;Thomas D. Lyon,&nbsp;J. Zoe Klemfuss\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/acp.70101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Children's understanding of the temporal terms “first,” “before,” and “after” has implications for describing experienced events, but has typically been studied by asking them to interpret described events. In this study, one hundred and one 3- to 6-year-olds completed two tasks. In the description task, children heard sequences described using temporal terms in forward (X before Y/after X, Y) or backward order (before Y, X/Y after X) and were asked what happened “first.” Children exhibited an order of mention bias, performing better in forward order, with no difference on “before” and “after.” In the experience task, children observed sequences and answered questions using temporal terms, with “before” and “after” asked both in forward (what happened before X?/after X, what happened?) and backward order (before X, what happened?/what happened after X?). Order made no difference. Children exhibited a forward order bias, performing better on “after” than “before,” and younger children performed best on “first.”</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48281,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Cognitive Psychology\",\"volume\":\"39 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Cognitive Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.70101\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Cognitive Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/acp.70101","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

儿童对时间术语“第一”、“之前”和“之后”的理解对描述经历过的事件有影响,但通常是通过要求他们解释所描述的事件来研究的。在这项研究中,101名3到6岁的孩子完成了两项任务。在描述任务中,孩子们听到用时间术语按照向前(X在Y之前/ X在Y之后)或向后(Y之前,X/Y在X之后)的顺序描述的序列,并被问及“首先”发生了什么。儿童表现出顺序提及偏差,在“之前”和“之后”的顺序上表现更好,在“之前”和“之后”上没有差异。在体验任务中,孩子们观察序列并使用时间术语回答问题,“之前”和“之后”都是向前问的(在X之前发生了什么?)/在X之后,发生了什么?)和倒序(在X之前,发生了什么?/ X之后发生了什么?)。秩序没有影响。孩子们表现出前向顺序偏见,在“之后”上比“之前”表现得更好,年龄更小的孩子在“首先”上表现得最好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Differences in Young Children's Performance on Sequencing Questions When Asked About Descriptions Versus Their Experience

Children's understanding of the temporal terms “first,” “before,” and “after” has implications for describing experienced events, but has typically been studied by asking them to interpret described events. In this study, one hundred and one 3- to 6-year-olds completed two tasks. In the description task, children heard sequences described using temporal terms in forward (X before Y/after X, Y) or backward order (before Y, X/Y after X) and were asked what happened “first.” Children exhibited an order of mention bias, performing better in forward order, with no difference on “before” and “after.” In the experience task, children observed sequences and answered questions using temporal terms, with “before” and “after” asked both in forward (what happened before X?/after X, what happened?) and backward order (before X, what happened?/what happened after X?). Order made no difference. Children exhibited a forward order bias, performing better on “after” than “before,” and younger children performed best on “first.”

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Applied Cognitive Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
8.30%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Applied Cognitive Psychology seeks to publish the best papers dealing with psychological analyses of memory, learning, thinking, problem solving, language, and consciousness as they occur in the real world. Applied Cognitive Psychology will publish papers on a wide variety of issues and from diverse theoretical perspectives. The journal focuses on studies of human performance and basic cognitive skills in everyday environments including, but not restricted to, studies of eyewitness memory, autobiographical memory, spatial cognition, skill training, expertise and skilled behaviour. Articles will normally combine realistic investigations of real world events with appropriate theoretical analyses and proper appraisal of practical implications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信