Aiden Jönsson, Maria Rugenstein, Frida A.-M. Bender, Daniel McCoy, Trude Eidhammer
{"title":"社区大气模式第6版中半球反照率对称的参数敏感性弱约束短波云辐射反馈","authors":"Aiden Jönsson, Maria Rugenstein, Frida A.-M. Bender, Daniel McCoy, Trude Eidhammer","doi":"10.1029/2025GL115948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Earth's albedo is symmetric between the northern and southern hemispheres (NH and SH, respectively) because SH clouds compensate for higher NH clear-sky albedo, a feature that climate models have difficulty capturing. We assess how parameterized processes affect a model's cloud albedo and albedo symmetry using a perturbed parameter ensemble (PPE) of atmospheric simulations. Parameters most significant to simulated albedo symmetry impact precipitation, turbulent dissipation, and sea salt aerosol emissions. Constraining the PPE's shortwave cloud feedbacks using the observed albedo symmetry yields a range of +0.61 <span></span><math>\n <semantics>\n <mrow>\n <mo>±</mo>\n </mrow>\n <annotation> $\\pm $</annotation>\n </semantics></math> 0.24 W m<sup>−2</sup> K<sup>−1</sup> (66% confidence), which is stronger than that of the model's control simulation due to parameter settings that lead to greater loss of subtropical low clouds and weaker negative cloud phase feedback. Although these settings would reduce cloud albedo bias compared to the control simulation, we find that albedo symmetry has limited potential as a constraint for cloud feedbacks on its own.</p>","PeriodicalId":12523,"journal":{"name":"Geophysical Research Letters","volume":"52 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025GL115948","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Parametric Sensitivity of Hemispheric Albedo Symmetry Weakly Constrains Shortwave Cloud Radiative Feedbacks in the Community Atmosphere Model Version 6\",\"authors\":\"Aiden Jönsson, Maria Rugenstein, Frida A.-M. Bender, Daniel McCoy, Trude Eidhammer\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025GL115948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Earth's albedo is symmetric between the northern and southern hemispheres (NH and SH, respectively) because SH clouds compensate for higher NH clear-sky albedo, a feature that climate models have difficulty capturing. We assess how parameterized processes affect a model's cloud albedo and albedo symmetry using a perturbed parameter ensemble (PPE) of atmospheric simulations. Parameters most significant to simulated albedo symmetry impact precipitation, turbulent dissipation, and sea salt aerosol emissions. Constraining the PPE's shortwave cloud feedbacks using the observed albedo symmetry yields a range of +0.61 <span></span><math>\\n <semantics>\\n <mrow>\\n <mo>±</mo>\\n </mrow>\\n <annotation> $\\\\pm $</annotation>\\n </semantics></math> 0.24 W m<sup>−2</sup> K<sup>−1</sup> (66% confidence), which is stronger than that of the model's control simulation due to parameter settings that lead to greater loss of subtropical low clouds and weaker negative cloud phase feedback. Although these settings would reduce cloud albedo bias compared to the control simulation, we find that albedo symmetry has limited potential as a constraint for cloud feedbacks on its own.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12523,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"volume\":\"52 14\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025GL115948\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geophysical Research Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL115948\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geophysical Research Letters","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025GL115948","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
地球的反照率在北半球和南半球(分别为北半球和南半球)之间是对称的,因为北半球的云补偿了北半球较高的晴空反照率,而气候模式很难捕捉到这一特征。我们利用大气模拟的扰动参数集合(PPE)来评估参数化过程如何影响模式的云反照率和反照率对称性。对模拟反照率对称影响降水、湍流耗散和海盐气溶胶排放最重要的参数。利用观测到的反照率对称来约束PPE的短波云反馈,得到的范围为+0.61±$\pm $ 0.24 W m−2 K−1(66%置信度),这比模型的控制模拟结果更强,因为参数设置导致副热带低云损失更大,云的负相位反馈更弱。尽管与控制模拟相比,这些设置可以减少云反照率偏差,但我们发现反照率对称性本身作为云反馈约束的潜力有限。
Parametric Sensitivity of Hemispheric Albedo Symmetry Weakly Constrains Shortwave Cloud Radiative Feedbacks in the Community Atmosphere Model Version 6
Earth's albedo is symmetric between the northern and southern hemispheres (NH and SH, respectively) because SH clouds compensate for higher NH clear-sky albedo, a feature that climate models have difficulty capturing. We assess how parameterized processes affect a model's cloud albedo and albedo symmetry using a perturbed parameter ensemble (PPE) of atmospheric simulations. Parameters most significant to simulated albedo symmetry impact precipitation, turbulent dissipation, and sea salt aerosol emissions. Constraining the PPE's shortwave cloud feedbacks using the observed albedo symmetry yields a range of +0.61 0.24 W m−2 K−1 (66% confidence), which is stronger than that of the model's control simulation due to parameter settings that lead to greater loss of subtropical low clouds and weaker negative cloud phase feedback. Although these settings would reduce cloud albedo bias compared to the control simulation, we find that albedo symmetry has limited potential as a constraint for cloud feedbacks on its own.
期刊介绍:
Geophysical Research Letters (GRL) publishes high-impact, innovative, and timely research on major scientific advances in all the major geoscience disciplines. Papers are communications-length articles and should have broad and immediate implications in their discipline or across the geosciences. GRLmaintains the fastest turn-around of all high-impact publications in the geosciences and works closely with authors to ensure broad visibility of top papers.