家禽食品沙门氏菌和鸡胗的风险评估模型:IV.消费者反应步骤

IF 1.8 4区 农林科学 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY
Thomas P. Oscar
{"title":"家禽食品沙门氏菌和鸡胗的风险评估模型:IV.消费者反应步骤","authors":"Thomas P. Oscar","doi":"10.1111/jfs.70026","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>A Poultry Food Assess Risk Model (PFARM) for <i>Salmonella</i> and chicken gizzards was developed and published in four steps because of its complexity. In the present study, outputs from the first three steps were combined to predict consumer responses of no response, infection, illness, hospitalization, and death. The PFARM found that salmonellosis (illness, hospitalization, or death) was a rare event (15 cases per 100,000 consumers) that occurred by random chance when multiple risk factors occurred together. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk factors for salmonellosis were cross-contamination and growth on lettuce, <i>Salmonella</i> serotype and number at consumption, buffering capacity of the meal, and consumer health and immunity. Scenario analysis indicated that initial <i>Salmonella</i> prevalence, number, and serotype changed (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) over time in the simulated production chain but were poor indicators of salmonellosis because they did not consider the identified risk factors for salmonellosis. Based on lessons learned in the COVID-19 pandemic, the economics of salmonellosis, and the results of the current study, it was concluded that the best indicator of poultry food safety was the PFARM prediction of the cases of severe salmonellosis (hospitalization and death) per lot (1000 kg) of chicken gizzards. Interestingly, cases of severe salmonellosis per lot of chicken gizzards did not change across time in the production chain despite significant changes in <i>Salmonella</i> prevalence, number, and serotype at final product testing. This may explain why the current approach to poultry food safety is not reducing rates of foodborne salmonellosis.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15814,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Food Safety","volume":"45 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Poultry Food Assess Risk Model for Salmonella and Chicken Gizzards: IV. Consumer Response Step\",\"authors\":\"Thomas P. Oscar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jfs.70026\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>A Poultry Food Assess Risk Model (PFARM) for <i>Salmonella</i> and chicken gizzards was developed and published in four steps because of its complexity. In the present study, outputs from the first three steps were combined to predict consumer responses of no response, infection, illness, hospitalization, and death. The PFARM found that salmonellosis (illness, hospitalization, or death) was a rare event (15 cases per 100,000 consumers) that occurred by random chance when multiple risk factors occurred together. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk factors for salmonellosis were cross-contamination and growth on lettuce, <i>Salmonella</i> serotype and number at consumption, buffering capacity of the meal, and consumer health and immunity. Scenario analysis indicated that initial <i>Salmonella</i> prevalence, number, and serotype changed (<i>p</i> ≤ 0.05) over time in the simulated production chain but were poor indicators of salmonellosis because they did not consider the identified risk factors for salmonellosis. Based on lessons learned in the COVID-19 pandemic, the economics of salmonellosis, and the results of the current study, it was concluded that the best indicator of poultry food safety was the PFARM prediction of the cases of severe salmonellosis (hospitalization and death) per lot (1000 kg) of chicken gizzards. Interestingly, cases of severe salmonellosis per lot of chicken gizzards did not change across time in the production chain despite significant changes in <i>Salmonella</i> prevalence, number, and serotype at final product testing. This may explain why the current approach to poultry food safety is not reducing rates of foodborne salmonellosis.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":15814,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Food Safety\",\"volume\":\"45 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Food Safety\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.70026\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Food Safety","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jfs.70026","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

鉴于沙门氏菌和鸡胗的复杂性,本文分四步建立了禽类食品风险评估模型(PFARM)。在本研究中,将前三个步骤的输出结合起来预测消费者对无反应、感染、疾病、住院和死亡的反应。PFARM发现,沙门氏菌病(患病、住院或死亡)是一种罕见的事件(每10万名消费者中有15例),是多种危险因素共同发生时随机发生的。敏感性分析表明,生菜的交叉污染和生长、食用时沙门氏菌的血清型和数量、饲料的缓冲能力以及消费者的健康和免疫力是沙门氏菌病的危险因素。情景分析表明,在模拟生产链中,沙门氏菌的初始患病率、数量和血清型随着时间的推移而变化(p≤0.05),但由于没有考虑已确定的沙门氏菌病危险因素,因此它们不能作为沙门氏菌病的较差指标。根据2019冠状病毒病大流行的经验教训、沙门氏菌病的经济学以及目前的研究结果,得出的结论是,家禽食品安全的最佳指标是PFARM对每批(1000公斤)鸡胗严重沙门氏菌病(住院和死亡)病例的预测。有趣的是,尽管在最终产品测试中沙门氏菌的流行率、数量和血清型发生了重大变化,但在生产链中,每批次鸡胗的严重沙门氏菌病病例并没有随着时间的推移而变化。这也许可以解释为什么目前的家禽食品安全方法不能降低食源性沙门氏菌病的发病率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Poultry Food Assess Risk Model for Salmonella and Chicken Gizzards: IV. Consumer Response Step

A Poultry Food Assess Risk Model (PFARM) for Salmonella and chicken gizzards was developed and published in four steps because of its complexity. In the present study, outputs from the first three steps were combined to predict consumer responses of no response, infection, illness, hospitalization, and death. The PFARM found that salmonellosis (illness, hospitalization, or death) was a rare event (15 cases per 100,000 consumers) that occurred by random chance when multiple risk factors occurred together. Sensitivity analysis indicated that the risk factors for salmonellosis were cross-contamination and growth on lettuce, Salmonella serotype and number at consumption, buffering capacity of the meal, and consumer health and immunity. Scenario analysis indicated that initial Salmonella prevalence, number, and serotype changed (p ≤ 0.05) over time in the simulated production chain but were poor indicators of salmonellosis because they did not consider the identified risk factors for salmonellosis. Based on lessons learned in the COVID-19 pandemic, the economics of salmonellosis, and the results of the current study, it was concluded that the best indicator of poultry food safety was the PFARM prediction of the cases of severe salmonellosis (hospitalization and death) per lot (1000 kg) of chicken gizzards. Interestingly, cases of severe salmonellosis per lot of chicken gizzards did not change across time in the production chain despite significant changes in Salmonella prevalence, number, and serotype at final product testing. This may explain why the current approach to poultry food safety is not reducing rates of foodborne salmonellosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Food Safety
Journal of Food Safety 工程技术-生物工程与应用微生物
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
69
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Food Safety emphasizes mechanistic studies involving inhibition, injury, and metabolism of food poisoning microorganisms, as well as the regulation of growth and toxin production in both model systems and complex food substrates. It also focuses on pathogens which cause food-borne illness, helping readers understand the factors affecting the initial detection of parasites, their development, transmission, and methods of control and destruction.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信