Yongping Zhang , Zhanqiang Shi , Mengqiu Cao , Wu Xiao , Hui Kong
{"title":"研究无桩共享单车和电动单车在住宅和工作人群中的空间公平性","authors":"Yongping Zhang , Zhanqiang Shi , Mengqiu Cao , Wu Xiao , Hui Kong","doi":"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shared micro-mobility is experiencing growing global popularity. Previous studies mainly explored the shared bike-associated spatial equity issue faced by the residential population in Western cities, often neglecting shared e-bike systems and the working population. This paper examines the equity performance of both shared bikes and shared e-bikes, and considers both residential and working populations in a Chinese city (i.e., Wenzhou). Utilising an accessibility-based framework integrating multi-source data like massive user-generated trip and mobile phone data, our results show that shared bikes provide better horizontal equity than e-bikes due to broader fleet availability and distribution. Vertical equity analysis reveals systematic disparities between residential and working populations. Among working populations, individuals aged 19–29 enjoy better access to shared e-bikes, while those aged 50–59 face consistently lower accessibility across both bike types. In contrast, among residents, the 50–59 age group show relatively higher accessibility, whereas younger residents (19–29) encounter limitations, particularly for shared e-bikes. Non-local populations are disadvantaged in both modes, and female users exhibit slightly higher accessibility. This study provides valuable insights into the micro-mobility equity in Asian urban contexts, offering implications for policy-making and planning to develop sustainable and equitable micro-mobility systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23277,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","volume":"147 ","pages":"Article 104922"},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining spatial equity of dockless shared bikes and e-bikes for residential and working populations\",\"authors\":\"Yongping Zhang , Zhanqiang Shi , Mengqiu Cao , Wu Xiao , Hui Kong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trd.2025.104922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Shared micro-mobility is experiencing growing global popularity. Previous studies mainly explored the shared bike-associated spatial equity issue faced by the residential population in Western cities, often neglecting shared e-bike systems and the working population. This paper examines the equity performance of both shared bikes and shared e-bikes, and considers both residential and working populations in a Chinese city (i.e., Wenzhou). Utilising an accessibility-based framework integrating multi-source data like massive user-generated trip and mobile phone data, our results show that shared bikes provide better horizontal equity than e-bikes due to broader fleet availability and distribution. Vertical equity analysis reveals systematic disparities between residential and working populations. Among working populations, individuals aged 19–29 enjoy better access to shared e-bikes, while those aged 50–59 face consistently lower accessibility across both bike types. In contrast, among residents, the 50–59 age group show relatively higher accessibility, whereas younger residents (19–29) encounter limitations, particularly for shared e-bikes. Non-local populations are disadvantaged in both modes, and female users exhibit slightly higher accessibility. This study provides valuable insights into the micro-mobility equity in Asian urban contexts, offering implications for policy-making and planning to develop sustainable and equitable micro-mobility systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23277,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"volume\":\"147 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104922\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003323\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Part D-transport and Environment","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920925003323","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Examining spatial equity of dockless shared bikes and e-bikes for residential and working populations
Shared micro-mobility is experiencing growing global popularity. Previous studies mainly explored the shared bike-associated spatial equity issue faced by the residential population in Western cities, often neglecting shared e-bike systems and the working population. This paper examines the equity performance of both shared bikes and shared e-bikes, and considers both residential and working populations in a Chinese city (i.e., Wenzhou). Utilising an accessibility-based framework integrating multi-source data like massive user-generated trip and mobile phone data, our results show that shared bikes provide better horizontal equity than e-bikes due to broader fleet availability and distribution. Vertical equity analysis reveals systematic disparities between residential and working populations. Among working populations, individuals aged 19–29 enjoy better access to shared e-bikes, while those aged 50–59 face consistently lower accessibility across both bike types. In contrast, among residents, the 50–59 age group show relatively higher accessibility, whereas younger residents (19–29) encounter limitations, particularly for shared e-bikes. Non-local populations are disadvantaged in both modes, and female users exhibit slightly higher accessibility. This study provides valuable insights into the micro-mobility equity in Asian urban contexts, offering implications for policy-making and planning to develop sustainable and equitable micro-mobility systems.
期刊介绍:
Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment focuses on original research exploring the environmental impacts of transportation, policy responses to these impacts, and their implications for transportation system design, planning, and management. The journal comprehensively covers the interaction between transportation and the environment, ranging from local effects on specific geographical areas to global implications such as natural resource depletion and atmospheric pollution.
We welcome research papers across all transportation modes, including maritime, air, and land transportation, assessing their environmental impacts broadly. Papers addressing both mobile aspects and transportation infrastructure are considered. The journal prioritizes empirical findings and policy responses of regulatory, planning, technical, or fiscal nature. Articles are policy-driven, accessible, and applicable to readers from diverse disciplines, emphasizing relevance and practicality. We encourage interdisciplinary submissions and welcome contributions from economically developing and advanced countries alike, reflecting our international orientation.