Danielli Cossul , Tarcisio Abreu Saurin , Rosana da Silva Fraga , Simone Silveira Pasin , Ricardo de Souza Kuchenbecker
{"title":"从条形码药物管理的变通方法中学习:安全ii的观点","authors":"Danielli Cossul , Tarcisio Abreu Saurin , Rosana da Silva Fraga , Simone Silveira Pasin , Ricardo de Souza Kuchenbecker","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Workarounds (WAs) in healthcare digital technologies are common, and several coping measures have been proposed. However, prior studies did not emphasize how to learn from WAs, which should be the basis for any improvement. This study addresses this gap by introducing guidelines to learn from WAs. The guidelines are underpinned by the Safety-II perspective, which recognizes that WAs are context-dependent and have mixed outcomes. A case study of barcode medication administration in a large hospital provides the empirical foundation for the guidelines. Data collection encompassed documentary analysis, shadowing of caregivers, interviews, focus groups, a survey for assessing risks of WAs, and a psychological safety survey. Results revealed 22 WAs, 43 contributing factors, nine potential desired outcomes and nine potential undesired outcomes. Tackling the contributing factors is crucial to reduce the frequency and risks associated with WAs. Five learning guidelines emerged, addressing: (<em>i</em>) prioritization of WAs based on their risk; (<em>ii</em>) emphasis on risk reduction rather than elimination; (<em>iii</em>) data-driven focus groups; (<em>iv</em>) limitations of WAs as a source of learning; and (<em>v</em>) use of language consistent with Safety-II; this guideline is accompanied by a new WA definition. These guidelines might inform the design of learning systems supportive of resilient healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104605"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning from workarounds in barcode medication administration: a Safety-II perspective\",\"authors\":\"Danielli Cossul , Tarcisio Abreu Saurin , Rosana da Silva Fraga , Simone Silveira Pasin , Ricardo de Souza Kuchenbecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Workarounds (WAs) in healthcare digital technologies are common, and several coping measures have been proposed. However, prior studies did not emphasize how to learn from WAs, which should be the basis for any improvement. This study addresses this gap by introducing guidelines to learn from WAs. The guidelines are underpinned by the Safety-II perspective, which recognizes that WAs are context-dependent and have mixed outcomes. A case study of barcode medication administration in a large hospital provides the empirical foundation for the guidelines. Data collection encompassed documentary analysis, shadowing of caregivers, interviews, focus groups, a survey for assessing risks of WAs, and a psychological safety survey. Results revealed 22 WAs, 43 contributing factors, nine potential desired outcomes and nine potential undesired outcomes. Tackling the contributing factors is crucial to reduce the frequency and risks associated with WAs. Five learning guidelines emerged, addressing: (<em>i</em>) prioritization of WAs based on their risk; (<em>ii</em>) emphasis on risk reduction rather than elimination; (<em>iii</em>) data-driven focus groups; (<em>iv</em>) limitations of WAs as a source of learning; and (<em>v</em>) use of language consistent with Safety-II; this guideline is accompanied by a new WA definition. These guidelines might inform the design of learning systems supportive of resilient healthcare.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025001413\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025001413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Learning from workarounds in barcode medication administration: a Safety-II perspective
Workarounds (WAs) in healthcare digital technologies are common, and several coping measures have been proposed. However, prior studies did not emphasize how to learn from WAs, which should be the basis for any improvement. This study addresses this gap by introducing guidelines to learn from WAs. The guidelines are underpinned by the Safety-II perspective, which recognizes that WAs are context-dependent and have mixed outcomes. A case study of barcode medication administration in a large hospital provides the empirical foundation for the guidelines. Data collection encompassed documentary analysis, shadowing of caregivers, interviews, focus groups, a survey for assessing risks of WAs, and a psychological safety survey. Results revealed 22 WAs, 43 contributing factors, nine potential desired outcomes and nine potential undesired outcomes. Tackling the contributing factors is crucial to reduce the frequency and risks associated with WAs. Five learning guidelines emerged, addressing: (i) prioritization of WAs based on their risk; (ii) emphasis on risk reduction rather than elimination; (iii) data-driven focus groups; (iv) limitations of WAs as a source of learning; and (v) use of language consistent with Safety-II; this guideline is accompanied by a new WA definition. These guidelines might inform the design of learning systems supportive of resilient healthcare.
期刊介绍:
Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.