从条形码药物管理的变通方法中学习:安全ii的观点

IF 3.4 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
Danielli Cossul , Tarcisio Abreu Saurin , Rosana da Silva Fraga , Simone Silveira Pasin , Ricardo de Souza Kuchenbecker
{"title":"从条形码药物管理的变通方法中学习:安全ii的观点","authors":"Danielli Cossul ,&nbsp;Tarcisio Abreu Saurin ,&nbsp;Rosana da Silva Fraga ,&nbsp;Simone Silveira Pasin ,&nbsp;Ricardo de Souza Kuchenbecker","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Workarounds (WAs) in healthcare digital technologies are common, and several coping measures have been proposed. However, prior studies did not emphasize how to learn from WAs, which should be the basis for any improvement. This study addresses this gap by introducing guidelines to learn from WAs. The guidelines are underpinned by the Safety-II perspective, which recognizes that WAs are context-dependent and have mixed outcomes. A case study of barcode medication administration in a large hospital provides the empirical foundation for the guidelines. Data collection encompassed documentary analysis, shadowing of caregivers, interviews, focus groups, a survey for assessing risks of WAs, and a psychological safety survey. Results revealed 22 WAs, 43 contributing factors, nine potential desired outcomes and nine potential undesired outcomes. Tackling the contributing factors is crucial to reduce the frequency and risks associated with WAs. Five learning guidelines emerged, addressing: (<em>i</em>) prioritization of WAs based on their risk; (<em>ii</em>) emphasis on risk reduction rather than elimination; (<em>iii</em>) data-driven focus groups; (<em>iv</em>) limitations of WAs as a source of learning; and (<em>v</em>) use of language consistent with Safety-II; this guideline is accompanied by a new WA definition. These guidelines might inform the design of learning systems supportive of resilient healthcare.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 104605"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learning from workarounds in barcode medication administration: a Safety-II perspective\",\"authors\":\"Danielli Cossul ,&nbsp;Tarcisio Abreu Saurin ,&nbsp;Rosana da Silva Fraga ,&nbsp;Simone Silveira Pasin ,&nbsp;Ricardo de Souza Kuchenbecker\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.apergo.2025.104605\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Workarounds (WAs) in healthcare digital technologies are common, and several coping measures have been proposed. However, prior studies did not emphasize how to learn from WAs, which should be the basis for any improvement. This study addresses this gap by introducing guidelines to learn from WAs. The guidelines are underpinned by the Safety-II perspective, which recognizes that WAs are context-dependent and have mixed outcomes. A case study of barcode medication administration in a large hospital provides the empirical foundation for the guidelines. Data collection encompassed documentary analysis, shadowing of caregivers, interviews, focus groups, a survey for assessing risks of WAs, and a psychological safety survey. Results revealed 22 WAs, 43 contributing factors, nine potential desired outcomes and nine potential undesired outcomes. Tackling the contributing factors is crucial to reduce the frequency and risks associated with WAs. Five learning guidelines emerged, addressing: (<em>i</em>) prioritization of WAs based on their risk; (<em>ii</em>) emphasis on risk reduction rather than elimination; (<em>iii</em>) data-driven focus groups; (<em>iv</em>) limitations of WAs as a source of learning; and (<em>v</em>) use of language consistent with Safety-II; this guideline is accompanied by a new WA definition. These guidelines might inform the design of learning systems supportive of resilient healthcare.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\"129 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104605\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Applied Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025001413\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687025001413","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

医疗保健数字技术中的变通方法(WAs)很常见,并且提出了几种应对措施。然而,之前的研究并没有强调如何从WAs中学习,这应该是任何改进的基础。本研究通过引入从WAs学习的指导方针来解决这一差距。该指南以Safety-II视角为基础,该视角认识到WAs依赖于上下文并且具有混合结果。通过对某大型医院条码给药的案例研究,为该指南提供了经验基础。数据收集包括文献分析、看护人跟踪、访谈、焦点小组、评估WAs风险的调查和心理安全调查。结果显示22个WAs, 43个影响因素,9个潜在的期望结果和9个潜在的不期望结果。处理促成因素对于减少与WAs相关的频率和风险至关重要。出现了五项学习准则,涉及:(i)根据风险确定WAs的优先次序;强调减少而不是消除风险;数据驱动的焦点小组;(iv)人工智能作为学习来源的局限性;(v)使用符合安全ii的语言;该指南附带了一个新的WA定义。这些指导方针可以为设计支持弹性医疗保健的学习系统提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Learning from workarounds in barcode medication administration: a Safety-II perspective
Workarounds (WAs) in healthcare digital technologies are common, and several coping measures have been proposed. However, prior studies did not emphasize how to learn from WAs, which should be the basis for any improvement. This study addresses this gap by introducing guidelines to learn from WAs. The guidelines are underpinned by the Safety-II perspective, which recognizes that WAs are context-dependent and have mixed outcomes. A case study of barcode medication administration in a large hospital provides the empirical foundation for the guidelines. Data collection encompassed documentary analysis, shadowing of caregivers, interviews, focus groups, a survey for assessing risks of WAs, and a psychological safety survey. Results revealed 22 WAs, 43 contributing factors, nine potential desired outcomes and nine potential undesired outcomes. Tackling the contributing factors is crucial to reduce the frequency and risks associated with WAs. Five learning guidelines emerged, addressing: (i) prioritization of WAs based on their risk; (ii) emphasis on risk reduction rather than elimination; (iii) data-driven focus groups; (iv) limitations of WAs as a source of learning; and (v) use of language consistent with Safety-II; this guideline is accompanied by a new WA definition. These guidelines might inform the design of learning systems supportive of resilient healthcare.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信