整合可持续性和生产力:公共政策在巴西家庭农业中的作用

IF 5.1 1区 社会学 Q1 GEOGRAPHY
Frederico Pereira Tenchini , Fábio de Oliveira Paula , Marcos Cohen , Jorge Ferreira da Silva
{"title":"整合可持续性和生产力:公共政策在巴西家庭农业中的作用","authors":"Frederico Pereira Tenchini ,&nbsp;Fábio de Oliveira Paula ,&nbsp;Marcos Cohen ,&nbsp;Jorge Ferreira da Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103811","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Family farming plays a crucial role in food security and sustainability, but faces challenges related to productivity and access to effective public policies. This study examines how internal resources, sustainable practices, and public policies—specifically credit and technical assistance—influence productivity in Brazilian family farming, grounded in the Resource-Based View (RBV), Stakeholder Theory, and Contingency Theory. Using regression models applied to agricultural census data, four hypotheses regarding the interaction of these factors were tested. Results indicate that internal resources, such as land ownership and higher education levels, positively affect productivity, while sustainable practices like organic fertilization and forest planting provide benefits but reveal trade-offs, such as challenges in the absence of pesticides. The National Program for Strengthening Family Farming (PRONAF) consistently promoted productive and conservationist practices, whereas rural extension services (ATER) exhibited limitations, particularly in areas requiring greater technical specialization. The interaction between public policies and internal resources proved essential for maximizing productive efficiency. The study concludes that integrated public policies combining agricultural credit and specialized technical assistance are vital for aligning productivity and sustainability. This research connects established theories with agricultural practices, offering recommendations for public policy improvement and future directions to strengthen family farming.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":17002,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Rural Studies","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 103811"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating sustainability and productivity: The role of public policies in Brazilian family farming\",\"authors\":\"Frederico Pereira Tenchini ,&nbsp;Fábio de Oliveira Paula ,&nbsp;Marcos Cohen ,&nbsp;Jorge Ferreira da Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jrurstud.2025.103811\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Family farming plays a crucial role in food security and sustainability, but faces challenges related to productivity and access to effective public policies. This study examines how internal resources, sustainable practices, and public policies—specifically credit and technical assistance—influence productivity in Brazilian family farming, grounded in the Resource-Based View (RBV), Stakeholder Theory, and Contingency Theory. Using regression models applied to agricultural census data, four hypotheses regarding the interaction of these factors were tested. Results indicate that internal resources, such as land ownership and higher education levels, positively affect productivity, while sustainable practices like organic fertilization and forest planting provide benefits but reveal trade-offs, such as challenges in the absence of pesticides. The National Program for Strengthening Family Farming (PRONAF) consistently promoted productive and conservationist practices, whereas rural extension services (ATER) exhibited limitations, particularly in areas requiring greater technical specialization. The interaction between public policies and internal resources proved essential for maximizing productive efficiency. The study concludes that integrated public policies combining agricultural credit and specialized technical assistance are vital for aligning productivity and sustainability. This research connects established theories with agricultural practices, offering recommendations for public policy improvement and future directions to strengthen family farming.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":17002,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"volume\":\"119 \",\"pages\":\"Article 103811\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Rural Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725002529\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Rural Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0743016725002529","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

家庭农业在粮食安全和可持续性方面发挥着至关重要的作用,但面临着与生产力和获得有效公共政策相关的挑战。本研究以资源基础观(RBV)、利益相关者理论和权变理论为基础,探讨了内部资源、可持续实践和公共政策(特别是信贷和技术援助)如何影响巴西家庭农业的生产力。利用农业普查数据的回归模型,对这些因素相互作用的四个假设进行了检验。结果表明,内部资源,如土地所有权和高等教育水平,对生产力有积极影响,而有机施肥和森林种植等可持续做法提供了好处,但也存在权衡,如缺乏农药的挑战。国家加强家庭农业方案一贯促进生产和保护做法,而农村推广服务则表现出局限性,特别是在需要更大技术专业化的领域。公共政策和内部资源之间的相互作用证明对最大限度地提高生产效率是必不可少的。该研究的结论是,结合农业信贷和专业技术援助的综合公共政策对于协调生产力和可持续性至关重要。本研究将已建立的理论与农业实践相结合,为公共政策的改进和未来加强家庭农业的方向提供建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Integrating sustainability and productivity: The role of public policies in Brazilian family farming

Integrating sustainability and productivity: The role of public policies in Brazilian family farming
Family farming plays a crucial role in food security and sustainability, but faces challenges related to productivity and access to effective public policies. This study examines how internal resources, sustainable practices, and public policies—specifically credit and technical assistance—influence productivity in Brazilian family farming, grounded in the Resource-Based View (RBV), Stakeholder Theory, and Contingency Theory. Using regression models applied to agricultural census data, four hypotheses regarding the interaction of these factors were tested. Results indicate that internal resources, such as land ownership and higher education levels, positively affect productivity, while sustainable practices like organic fertilization and forest planting provide benefits but reveal trade-offs, such as challenges in the absence of pesticides. The National Program for Strengthening Family Farming (PRONAF) consistently promoted productive and conservationist practices, whereas rural extension services (ATER) exhibited limitations, particularly in areas requiring greater technical specialization. The interaction between public policies and internal resources proved essential for maximizing productive efficiency. The study concludes that integrated public policies combining agricultural credit and specialized technical assistance are vital for aligning productivity and sustainability. This research connects established theories with agricultural practices, offering recommendations for public policy improvement and future directions to strengthen family farming.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.80%
发文量
286
期刊介绍: The Journal of Rural Studies publishes research articles relating to such rural issues as society, demography, housing, employment, transport, services, land-use, recreation, agriculture and conservation. The focus is on those areas encompassing extensive land-use, with small-scale and diffuse settlement patterns and communities linked into the surrounding landscape and milieux. Particular emphasis will be given to aspects of planning policy and management. The journal is international and interdisciplinary in scope and content.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信