{"title":"致密多孔La0.6Sr0.4CoO3-δ电极上的高温氧交换反应:模拟实验证据综述","authors":"Tatsuya Kawada","doi":"10.1016/j.ssi.2025.116973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Oxygen exchange kinetics was investigated to model the current-potential relationship of mixed conducting oxide electrodes used in SOFC and SOEC. Focusing on La<sub>0.6</sub>Sr<sub>0.4</sub>CoO<sub>3</sub> as a model material, experimental evidence so far obtained in our group were summarized and reanalyzed. The reaction order analysis suggested a complex reaction mechanism, for which we came to think of two series kinetics, surface process and subsurface process. The former refers to an exchange process between gas-phase oxygen molecules and some sort of surface oxygen species. The latter refers to the exchange of surface oxygen with bulk oxide ions, and the reaction barrier is not necessarily oxygen transport, but may be electron transport/transfer for oxygen in/ex-corporation This hypothesis appeared to resolve some of our remaining questions regarding the experimental results, such as scattered <em>p</em><sub>O<sub>2</sub></sub> dependence in high partial pressure range, the higher isotope exchange rates than electrochemical impedance, and the reaction rate enhancement in the presence of the LaSrCoO<sub>4</sub> phase. While a single piece of such experimental evidence is insufficient to prove the hypothesis, considering all the results together provides strong support. We then tried to separate the contributions of surface and subsurface processes by measuring the surface oxygen potential using a porous oxygen sensor. It revealed that the surface process is written as <span><math><msub><mi>J</mi><mi>s</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>J</mi><mrow><mi>s</mi><mo>,</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>∙</mo><mi>δ</mi><mo>∙</mo><mfenced><mrow><msubsup><mi>a</mi><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>p</mi><mrow><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mo>,</mo><mi>g</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></mfenced></math></span> and the subsurface process as <span><math><msub><mi>J</mi><mi>ss</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>J</mi><mrow><mi>ss</mi><mo>,</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>∙</mo><mfenced><mrow><msub><mi>a</mi><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>e</mi></mrow></msub><msubsup><mi>a</mi><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>−</mo><msubsup><mi>a</mi><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup><msub><mi>a</mi><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></mfenced><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>J</mi><mrow><mi>ss</mi><mo>,</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mfenced><mrow><mi>exp</mi><mfenced><mfrac><mrow><mi>β</mi><mo>∆</mo><msub><mi>μ</mi><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></msub></mrow><mi>RT</mi></mfrac></mfenced><mo>−</mo><mi>exp</mi><mfenced><mrow><mo>−</mo><mfrac><mrow><mfenced><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>β</mi></mrow></mfenced><mo>∆</mo><msub><mi>μ</mi><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></msub></mrow><mi>RT</mi></mfrac></mrow></mfenced></mrow></mfenced></math></span>, which are in good agreement with the experimental data even for films with different oxygen vacancy formation energies. For modeling porous electrodes, we considered it unnecessary to include the subsurface process based on experimental evidences, such as the higher area-specific reaction rate on the particle surface in a porous electrode than on the film electrode, and the lack of enhancement effect by LaSrCoO<sub>4</sub> phase. The current-voltage relationship estimated by applying <em>J</em><sub>s</sub> to the transmission line model was in good agreement with the experimental results.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":431,"journal":{"name":"Solid State Ionics","volume":"429 ","pages":"Article 116973"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"High temperature oxygen exchange reaction on dense and porous La0.6Sr0.4CoO3-δ electrodes: An overview of the experimental evidence for modeling\",\"authors\":\"Tatsuya Kawada\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ssi.2025.116973\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Oxygen exchange kinetics was investigated to model the current-potential relationship of mixed conducting oxide electrodes used in SOFC and SOEC. Focusing on La<sub>0.6</sub>Sr<sub>0.4</sub>CoO<sub>3</sub> as a model material, experimental evidence so far obtained in our group were summarized and reanalyzed. The reaction order analysis suggested a complex reaction mechanism, for which we came to think of two series kinetics, surface process and subsurface process. The former refers to an exchange process between gas-phase oxygen molecules and some sort of surface oxygen species. The latter refers to the exchange of surface oxygen with bulk oxide ions, and the reaction barrier is not necessarily oxygen transport, but may be electron transport/transfer for oxygen in/ex-corporation This hypothesis appeared to resolve some of our remaining questions regarding the experimental results, such as scattered <em>p</em><sub>O<sub>2</sub></sub> dependence in high partial pressure range, the higher isotope exchange rates than electrochemical impedance, and the reaction rate enhancement in the presence of the LaSrCoO<sub>4</sub> phase. While a single piece of such experimental evidence is insufficient to prove the hypothesis, considering all the results together provides strong support. We then tried to separate the contributions of surface and subsurface processes by measuring the surface oxygen potential using a porous oxygen sensor. It revealed that the surface process is written as <span><math><msub><mi>J</mi><mi>s</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>J</mi><mrow><mi>s</mi><mo>,</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>∙</mo><mi>δ</mi><mo>∙</mo><mfenced><mrow><msubsup><mi>a</mi><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow><mn>2</mn></msubsup><mo>−</mo><msub><mi>p</mi><mrow><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub><mo>,</mo><mi>g</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></mfenced></math></span> and the subsurface process as <span><math><msub><mi>J</mi><mi>ss</mi></msub><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>J</mi><mrow><mi>ss</mi><mo>,</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mo>∙</mo><mfenced><mrow><msub><mi>a</mi><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>e</mi></mrow></msub><msubsup><mi>a</mi><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup><mo>−</mo><msubsup><mi>a</mi><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>e</mi></mrow><mrow><mo>−</mo><mn>1</mn></mrow></msubsup><msub><mi>a</mi><mrow><mi>O</mi><mo>,</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow></msub></mrow></mfenced><mo>=</mo><msub><mi>J</mi><mrow><mi>ss</mi><mo>,</mo><mn>0</mn></mrow></msub><mfenced><mrow><mi>exp</mi><mfenced><mfrac><mrow><mi>β</mi><mo>∆</mo><msub><mi>μ</mi><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></msub></mrow><mi>RT</mi></mfrac></mfenced><mo>−</mo><mi>exp</mi><mfenced><mrow><mo>−</mo><mfrac><mrow><mfenced><mrow><mn>1</mn><mo>−</mo><mi>β</mi></mrow></mfenced><mo>∆</mo><msub><mi>μ</mi><msub><mi>O</mi><mn>2</mn></msub></msub></mrow><mi>RT</mi></mfrac></mrow></mfenced></mrow></mfenced></math></span>, which are in good agreement with the experimental data even for films with different oxygen vacancy formation energies. For modeling porous electrodes, we considered it unnecessary to include the subsurface process based on experimental evidences, such as the higher area-specific reaction rate on the particle surface in a porous electrode than on the film electrode, and the lack of enhancement effect by LaSrCoO<sub>4</sub> phase. The current-voltage relationship estimated by applying <em>J</em><sub>s</sub> to the transmission line model was in good agreement with the experimental results.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solid State Ionics\",\"volume\":\"429 \",\"pages\":\"Article 116973\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solid State Ionics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167273825001924\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solid State Ionics","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167273825001924","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
High temperature oxygen exchange reaction on dense and porous La0.6Sr0.4CoO3-δ electrodes: An overview of the experimental evidence for modeling
Oxygen exchange kinetics was investigated to model the current-potential relationship of mixed conducting oxide electrodes used in SOFC and SOEC. Focusing on La0.6Sr0.4CoO3 as a model material, experimental evidence so far obtained in our group were summarized and reanalyzed. The reaction order analysis suggested a complex reaction mechanism, for which we came to think of two series kinetics, surface process and subsurface process. The former refers to an exchange process between gas-phase oxygen molecules and some sort of surface oxygen species. The latter refers to the exchange of surface oxygen with bulk oxide ions, and the reaction barrier is not necessarily oxygen transport, but may be electron transport/transfer for oxygen in/ex-corporation This hypothesis appeared to resolve some of our remaining questions regarding the experimental results, such as scattered pO2 dependence in high partial pressure range, the higher isotope exchange rates than electrochemical impedance, and the reaction rate enhancement in the presence of the LaSrCoO4 phase. While a single piece of such experimental evidence is insufficient to prove the hypothesis, considering all the results together provides strong support. We then tried to separate the contributions of surface and subsurface processes by measuring the surface oxygen potential using a porous oxygen sensor. It revealed that the surface process is written as and the subsurface process as , which are in good agreement with the experimental data even for films with different oxygen vacancy formation energies. For modeling porous electrodes, we considered it unnecessary to include the subsurface process based on experimental evidences, such as the higher area-specific reaction rate on the particle surface in a porous electrode than on the film electrode, and the lack of enhancement effect by LaSrCoO4 phase. The current-voltage relationship estimated by applying Js to the transmission line model was in good agreement with the experimental results.
期刊介绍:
This interdisciplinary journal is devoted to the physics, chemistry and materials science of diffusion, mass transport, and reactivity of solids. The major part of each issue is devoted to articles on:
(i) physics and chemistry of defects in solids;
(ii) reactions in and on solids, e.g. intercalation, corrosion, oxidation, sintering;
(iii) ion transport measurements, mechanisms and theory;
(iv) solid state electrochemistry;
(v) ionically-electronically mixed conducting solids.
Related technological applications are also included, provided their characteristics are interpreted in terms of the basic solid state properties.
Review papers and relevant symposium proceedings are welcome.