CO2注入条件下单质硫的溶解行为及其在高含硫气藏除硫中的应用

IF 7.5 1区 工程技术 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Fuel Pub Date : 2025-07-26 DOI:10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136374
Chaoping Mo , Guangdong Zhang , Yangang Li , Shuxia Jiang , Song Peng , Zhiliang Shi
{"title":"CO2注入条件下单质硫的溶解行为及其在高含硫气藏除硫中的应用","authors":"Chaoping Mo ,&nbsp;Guangdong Zhang ,&nbsp;Yangang Li ,&nbsp;Shuxia Jiang ,&nbsp;Song Peng ,&nbsp;Zhiliang Shi","doi":"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>To address sulfur deposition in high-sulfur gas reservoirs, this study investigates the dissolution behavior of elemental sulfur in CH<sub>4</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>S–CO<sub>2</sub> systems under CO<sub>2</sub> injection and evaluates its desulfurization effectiveness. A CS<sub>2</sub> absorption–mass spectrometry method was used to quantify sulfur solubility under different temperatures, pressures, and CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. Results show that solubility increases significantly with higher temperature, pressure, and CO<sub>2</sub> content. Four predictive models were assessed, and a high-accuracy empirical model (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.98) was developed for varying CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. Coreflooding and huff-n-puff experiments demonstrated that CO<sub>2</sub> injection effectively reduces sulfur saturation and enhances permeability, with liquid sulfur being more easily mobilized than solid sulfur. At 130 °C, 1 HCPV (Hydrocarbon Pore Volume) injection reduced sulfur saturation by up to 1.87 % and increased permeability by 16.8 % in high-quality cores. To enhance CO<sub>2</sub> dissolution, high-pressure injection is recommended, with a field injection rate of 100,000–300,000  m<sup>3</sup>/day. Huff-n-puff outperformed continuous flooding not only because sufficient soaking time for sulfur dissolution, but also because the shut-in period promotes uniform gas distribution, avoiding preferential flow through dominant channels. Optimal parameters were found by evenly splitting 0.3 HCPV over three cycles for liquid sulfur and 0.4 HCPV over four cycles for solid sulfur. These findings offer theoretical and practical guidance for CO<sub>2</sub>-based sulfur mitigation in sour gas reservoirs.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":325,"journal":{"name":"Fuel","volume":"404 ","pages":"Article 136374"},"PeriodicalIF":7.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissolution behavior of elemental sulfur under CO2 injection conditions and its application in sulfur deposition removal in high-sulfur gas reservoirs\",\"authors\":\"Chaoping Mo ,&nbsp;Guangdong Zhang ,&nbsp;Yangang Li ,&nbsp;Shuxia Jiang ,&nbsp;Song Peng ,&nbsp;Zhiliang Shi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.fuel.2025.136374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>To address sulfur deposition in high-sulfur gas reservoirs, this study investigates the dissolution behavior of elemental sulfur in CH<sub>4</sub>–H<sub>2</sub>S–CO<sub>2</sub> systems under CO<sub>2</sub> injection and evaluates its desulfurization effectiveness. A CS<sub>2</sub> absorption–mass spectrometry method was used to quantify sulfur solubility under different temperatures, pressures, and CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. Results show that solubility increases significantly with higher temperature, pressure, and CO<sub>2</sub> content. Four predictive models were assessed, and a high-accuracy empirical model (R<sup>2</sup> &gt; 0.98) was developed for varying CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations. Coreflooding and huff-n-puff experiments demonstrated that CO<sub>2</sub> injection effectively reduces sulfur saturation and enhances permeability, with liquid sulfur being more easily mobilized than solid sulfur. At 130 °C, 1 HCPV (Hydrocarbon Pore Volume) injection reduced sulfur saturation by up to 1.87 % and increased permeability by 16.8 % in high-quality cores. To enhance CO<sub>2</sub> dissolution, high-pressure injection is recommended, with a field injection rate of 100,000–300,000  m<sup>3</sup>/day. Huff-n-puff outperformed continuous flooding not only because sufficient soaking time for sulfur dissolution, but also because the shut-in period promotes uniform gas distribution, avoiding preferential flow through dominant channels. Optimal parameters were found by evenly splitting 0.3 HCPV over three cycles for liquid sulfur and 0.4 HCPV over four cycles for solid sulfur. These findings offer theoretical and practical guidance for CO<sub>2</sub>-based sulfur mitigation in sour gas reservoirs.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fuel\",\"volume\":\"404 \",\"pages\":\"Article 136374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fuel\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001623612502099X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fuel","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S001623612502099X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为解决高含硫气藏中硫沉积问题,研究了CO2注入条件下单质硫在CH4-H2S-CO2体系中的溶解行为,并评价了其脱硫效果。采用CS2吸收-质谱法定量硫在不同温度、压力和CO2浓度下的溶解度。结果表明,温度、压力和CO2含量越高,溶解度越高。对四种预测模型进行了评估,其中高精度经验模型(R2 >;0.98)是针对不同的CO2浓度而开发的。岩心驱替和鼓泡实验表明,CO2注入能有效降低硫饱和度,提高渗透率,且液态硫比固体硫更容易被调动。在130°C时,1 HCPV(烃类孔隙体积)注入可使高质量岩心的硫饱和度降低1.87%,渗透率提高16.8%。为了促进CO2的溶解,建议采用高压注入,现场注入量为10 - 30万m3/天。吞吐优于连续驱,不仅因为有足够的浸泡时间来溶解硫,还因为关井期促进了气体均匀分布,避免了优先流向优势通道。液体硫均匀分解为0.3 HCPV / 3个循环,固体硫均匀分解为0.4 HCPV / 4个循环。研究结果对含硫气藏co2基减硫具有一定的理论和实践指导意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dissolution behavior of elemental sulfur under CO2 injection conditions and its application in sulfur deposition removal in high-sulfur gas reservoirs
To address sulfur deposition in high-sulfur gas reservoirs, this study investigates the dissolution behavior of elemental sulfur in CH4–H2S–CO2 systems under CO2 injection and evaluates its desulfurization effectiveness. A CS2 absorption–mass spectrometry method was used to quantify sulfur solubility under different temperatures, pressures, and CO2 concentrations. Results show that solubility increases significantly with higher temperature, pressure, and CO2 content. Four predictive models were assessed, and a high-accuracy empirical model (R2 > 0.98) was developed for varying CO2 concentrations. Coreflooding and huff-n-puff experiments demonstrated that CO2 injection effectively reduces sulfur saturation and enhances permeability, with liquid sulfur being more easily mobilized than solid sulfur. At 130 °C, 1 HCPV (Hydrocarbon Pore Volume) injection reduced sulfur saturation by up to 1.87 % and increased permeability by 16.8 % in high-quality cores. To enhance CO2 dissolution, high-pressure injection is recommended, with a field injection rate of 100,000–300,000  m3/day. Huff-n-puff outperformed continuous flooding not only because sufficient soaking time for sulfur dissolution, but also because the shut-in period promotes uniform gas distribution, avoiding preferential flow through dominant channels. Optimal parameters were found by evenly splitting 0.3 HCPV over three cycles for liquid sulfur and 0.4 HCPV over four cycles for solid sulfur. These findings offer theoretical and practical guidance for CO2-based sulfur mitigation in sour gas reservoirs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fuel
Fuel 工程技术-工程:化工
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
20.30%
发文量
3506
审稿时长
64 days
期刊介绍: The exploration of energy sources remains a critical matter of study. For the past nine decades, fuel has consistently held the forefront in primary research efforts within the field of energy science. This area of investigation encompasses a wide range of subjects, with a particular emphasis on emerging concerns like environmental factors and pollution.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信