骨盆脆性骨折后的死亡率:系统回顾和荟萃分析

IF 2 3区 医学 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Norio Yamamoto , Hidehiro Someko , Yuki Nakashima , Shuri Nakao , Takao Kaneko , Takahiro Tsuge
{"title":"骨盆脆性骨折后的死亡率:系统回顾和荟萃分析","authors":"Norio Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Hidehiro Someko ,&nbsp;Yuki Nakashima ,&nbsp;Shuri Nakao ,&nbsp;Takao Kaneko ,&nbsp;Takahiro Tsuge","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112618","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) in older adults are increasingly recognized as serious injuries with substantial morbidity. However, mortality after FFP has not been comprehensively quantified across timepoints or patient subgroups, limiting the ability to inform prognosis and guide clinical strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the 1-year mortality following FFP in patients aged ≥60 years. We also assessed the mortality at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years after FFP, and the differences in mortality by geographic region, sex, fracture classification, or treatment modality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from inception to May 2024 in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Eligible studies reported mortality outcomes in patients aged ≥60 years with FFP. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled mortality at prespecified time points. We assessed the risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess differences by region, sex, fracture classification, and treatment modality. We conducted a sensitivity analysis including only the high-quality studies according to the JBI assessment. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pooled 1-year mortality was 17 % (95 % confidence interval, 14 %–19 %). The certainty of this evidence was rated as low because of publication bias and heterogeneity. The mortality at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years were 5 %, 10 %, 14 %, 26 %, and 46 %, respectively. Mortality was lower in studies from Asia than in those from Europe or North America. Male sex, lower-grade FFPs, and nonoperative management showed numerically higher mortality, though not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>FFPs are associated with substantial short- and long-term mortality, warranting their recognition as high-risk injuries in older adults. Regional and treatment-related variation highlights the need for individualized management. Future research should clarify causal mechanisms and assess targeted interventions to reduce mortality risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 10","pages":"Article 112618"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mortality following fragility fractures of the pelvis: Systematic review and meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Norio Yamamoto ,&nbsp;Hidehiro Someko ,&nbsp;Yuki Nakashima ,&nbsp;Shuri Nakao ,&nbsp;Takao Kaneko ,&nbsp;Takahiro Tsuge\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112618\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) in older adults are increasingly recognized as serious injuries with substantial morbidity. However, mortality after FFP has not been comprehensively quantified across timepoints or patient subgroups, limiting the ability to inform prognosis and guide clinical strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the 1-year mortality following FFP in patients aged ≥60 years. We also assessed the mortality at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years after FFP, and the differences in mortality by geographic region, sex, fracture classification, or treatment modality.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from inception to May 2024 in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Eligible studies reported mortality outcomes in patients aged ≥60 years with FFP. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled mortality at prespecified time points. We assessed the risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess differences by region, sex, fracture classification, and treatment modality. We conducted a sensitivity analysis including only the high-quality studies according to the JBI assessment. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The pooled 1-year mortality was 17 % (95 % confidence interval, 14 %–19 %). The certainty of this evidence was rated as low because of publication bias and heterogeneity. The mortality at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years were 5 %, 10 %, 14 %, 26 %, and 46 %, respectively. Mortality was lower in studies from Asia than in those from Europe or North America. Male sex, lower-grade FFPs, and nonoperative management showed numerically higher mortality, though not statistically significant.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>FFPs are associated with substantial short- and long-term mortality, warranting their recognition as high-risk injuries in older adults. Regional and treatment-related variation highlights the need for individualized management. Future research should clarify causal mechanisms and assess targeted interventions to reduce mortality risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 10\",\"pages\":\"Article 112618\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325004784\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325004784","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:老年人骨盆脆性骨折(FFPs)越来越被认为是一种严重的损伤,发病率很高。然而,FFP后的死亡率还没有跨时间点或患者亚组进行全面量化,限制了为预后提供信息和指导临床策略的能力。本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估年龄≥60岁患者FFP后1年死亡率。我们还评估了FFP后30天、3个月、6个月、2年和5年的死亡率,以及地理区域、性别、骨折分类或治疗方式的死亡率差异。方法:我们对MEDLINE、Embase和CENTRAL数据库中从开始到2024年5月发表的研究进行了系统回顾和荟萃分析。符合条件的研究报告了年龄≥60岁FFP患者的死亡率结果。使用随机效应模型估计预先指定时间点的总死亡率。我们使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所(JBI)流行关键评估工具评估偏倚风险。进行亚组分析以评估区域、性别、骨折分类和治疗方式的差异。我们进行了敏感性分析,仅包括根据JBI评估的高质量研究。采用建议分级评估、发展和评估方法评估证据的确定性。结果合并1年死亡率为17%(95%可信区间为14% - 19%)。由于发表偏倚和异质性,该证据的确定性被评为低。30天、3个月、6个月、2年和5年的死亡率分别为5%、10%、14%、26%和46%。亚洲研究的死亡率低于欧洲或北美的研究。男性、低级别FFPs和非手术治疗的死亡率较高,但无统计学意义。结论ffps与大量的短期和长期死亡率相关,值得将其视为老年人的高风险损伤。区域和治疗相关的差异突出了个性化管理的必要性。未来的研究应阐明因果机制,并评估有针对性的干预措施,以降低死亡风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mortality following fragility fractures of the pelvis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFPs) in older adults are increasingly recognized as serious injuries with substantial morbidity. However, mortality after FFP has not been comprehensively quantified across timepoints or patient subgroups, limiting the ability to inform prognosis and guide clinical strategies. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the 1-year mortality following FFP in patients aged ≥60 years. We also assessed the mortality at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years after FFP, and the differences in mortality by geographic region, sex, fracture classification, or treatment modality.

Methods

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published from inception to May 2024 in MEDLINE, Embase, and CENTRAL databases. Eligible studies reported mortality outcomes in patients aged ≥60 years with FFP. A random-effects model was used to estimate pooled mortality at prespecified time points. We assessed the risk of bias using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Prevalence Critical Appraisal Tool. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess differences by region, sex, fracture classification, and treatment modality. We conducted a sensitivity analysis including only the high-quality studies according to the JBI assessment. The certainty of evidence was evaluated using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach.

Results

The pooled 1-year mortality was 17 % (95 % confidence interval, 14 %–19 %). The certainty of this evidence was rated as low because of publication bias and heterogeneity. The mortality at 30 days, 3 months, 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years were 5 %, 10 %, 14 %, 26 %, and 46 %, respectively. Mortality was lower in studies from Asia than in those from Europe or North America. Male sex, lower-grade FFPs, and nonoperative management showed numerically higher mortality, though not statistically significant.

Conclusion

FFPs are associated with substantial short- and long-term mortality, warranting their recognition as high-risk injuries in older adults. Regional and treatment-related variation highlights the need for individualized management. Future research should clarify causal mechanisms and assess targeted interventions to reduce mortality risk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
699
审稿时长
96 days
期刊介绍: Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信