{"title":"认知负荷和正念冥想对风险和时间相关决策的影响","authors":"Natalia Bulla-Holthaus , Nadja Kairies-Schwarz , Irene Mussio","doi":"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102412","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study explores how cognitive load and a preventive mindfulness meditation impact decisions related to risk and time. For this, we use a controlled laboratory experiment with university students and a sequential design in which we elicit their risk and time attitudes twice. First, we elicit them in a baseline scenario. This is followed by an intervention period, in which we vary the presence of a one-time brief guided mindfulness meditation exercise. In second elicitation period, we then vary the inclusion of a cognitive load task. To measure potential physiological responses to cognitive load and mindfulness meditation, we continuously track participants’ heart rates using fitness watches throughout the experiment. We find that in treatments with cognitive load the average heart rate increases relatively more during the second elicitation than in those without it, suggesting an acute physiological response. While a neutral waiting period does not affect risk-related choices post-intervention, the one with a guided mindfulness meditation reduces the probability of risk seeking choices and decreases the probability of individuals to make no changes in choices, in the subsequent treatment with cognitive load. Attitudes towards time remain consistent.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":51637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","volume":"118 ","pages":"Article 102412"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of cognitive load and mindfulness meditation on decisions related to risk and time\",\"authors\":\"Natalia Bulla-Holthaus , Nadja Kairies-Schwarz , Irene Mussio\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socec.2025.102412\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study explores how cognitive load and a preventive mindfulness meditation impact decisions related to risk and time. For this, we use a controlled laboratory experiment with university students and a sequential design in which we elicit their risk and time attitudes twice. First, we elicit them in a baseline scenario. This is followed by an intervention period, in which we vary the presence of a one-time brief guided mindfulness meditation exercise. In second elicitation period, we then vary the inclusion of a cognitive load task. To measure potential physiological responses to cognitive load and mindfulness meditation, we continuously track participants’ heart rates using fitness watches throughout the experiment. We find that in treatments with cognitive load the average heart rate increases relatively more during the second elicitation than in those without it, suggesting an acute physiological response. While a neutral waiting period does not affect risk-related choices post-intervention, the one with a guided mindfulness meditation reduces the probability of risk seeking choices and decreases the probability of individuals to make no changes in choices, in the subsequent treatment with cognitive load. Attitudes towards time remain consistent.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51637,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"volume\":\"118 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221480432500076X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221480432500076X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The effects of cognitive load and mindfulness meditation on decisions related to risk and time
This study explores how cognitive load and a preventive mindfulness meditation impact decisions related to risk and time. For this, we use a controlled laboratory experiment with university students and a sequential design in which we elicit their risk and time attitudes twice. First, we elicit them in a baseline scenario. This is followed by an intervention period, in which we vary the presence of a one-time brief guided mindfulness meditation exercise. In second elicitation period, we then vary the inclusion of a cognitive load task. To measure potential physiological responses to cognitive load and mindfulness meditation, we continuously track participants’ heart rates using fitness watches throughout the experiment. We find that in treatments with cognitive load the average heart rate increases relatively more during the second elicitation than in those without it, suggesting an acute physiological response. While a neutral waiting period does not affect risk-related choices post-intervention, the one with a guided mindfulness meditation reduces the probability of risk seeking choices and decreases the probability of individuals to make no changes in choices, in the subsequent treatment with cognitive load. Attitudes towards time remain consistent.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly the Journal of Socio-Economics) welcomes submissions that deal with various economic topics but also involve issues that are related to other social sciences, especially psychology, or use experimental methods of inquiry. Thus, contributions in behavioral economics, experimental economics, economic psychology, and judgment and decision making are especially welcome. The journal is open to different research methodologies, as long as they are relevant to the topic and employed rigorously. Possible methodologies include, for example, experiments, surveys, empirical work, theoretical models, meta-analyses, case studies, and simulation-based analyses. Literature reviews that integrate findings from many studies are also welcome, but they should synthesize the literature in a useful manner and provide substantial contribution beyond what the reader could get by simply reading the abstracts of the cited papers. In empirical work, it is important that the results are not only statistically significant but also economically significant. A high contribution-to-length ratio is expected from published articles and therefore papers should not be unnecessarily long, and short articles are welcome. Articles should be written in a manner that is intelligible to our generalist readership. Book reviews are generally solicited but occasionally unsolicited reviews will also be published. Contact the Book Review Editor for related inquiries.