{"title":"小学教师对神经神话的信仰:一项11个国家的跨国研究","authors":"Oktay Cem Adiguzel , Patrice Potvin , Jérémie Blanchette Sarrasin , Cédric Vanhoolandt , Anaïs Corfdir , Nursultan Japashov , Aizhan Mansurova , Chin-Chung Tsai , Ching-Lin Wu , Ridvan Elmas , Derya Atik-Kara , Sibel Kucukkayhan , Abdel-Karim Zaid , Ihsane Kouchou , Alexandra Voulgari , Ousmane Sy , Ibrahima Sakho , Soo Boon Ng , Patrick Charland , Angélique Létourneau","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2025.100264","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study compares primary school teachers' beliefs in neuromyths related to brain function and learning across different cultural and linguistic contexts. Two main research questions are explored and analyzed: “Which neuromyths are believed by primary school teachers?” And “What are the formal and informal sources of these neuromyths among primary school teachers?”</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected from 1257 primary school teachers in 11 countries using the Multilingual Neuromyths Identification Questionnaire, available in eight languages. The descriptive survey design explored the prevalence of neuromyths and the sources that shape teachers' understanding of learning and intelligence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The findings indicate that 13 out of 21 neuromyths are prevalent in all of the countries that were surveyed. Notably, over 90 % of participants agreed with the theories of multiple intelligences and learning styles. These misconceptions are primarily acquired through formal sources, such as teacher training programmes and professional seminars, as well as through professional experience and personal intuition. In contrast, informal sources, such as the media and popular culture, appear to play a minor role in developing these beliefs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The persistence of neuromyths among teachers underscores a critical need for evidence-based neuroscience and cognitive psychology content in teacher education. This study underscores the urgent need to integrate evidence-based neuroscience and cognitive psychology into teacher education programs. The widespread belief in neuromyths highlights serious gaps in current educational policy and practice. To address this, coordinated national and international strategies are needed to inform ministries of education and policy makers about the prevalence and impact of these misconceptions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"40 ","pages":"Article 100264"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Belief in neuromyths among primary school teachers: A cross-national study of 11 countries\",\"authors\":\"Oktay Cem Adiguzel , Patrice Potvin , Jérémie Blanchette Sarrasin , Cédric Vanhoolandt , Anaïs Corfdir , Nursultan Japashov , Aizhan Mansurova , Chin-Chung Tsai , Ching-Lin Wu , Ridvan Elmas , Derya Atik-Kara , Sibel Kucukkayhan , Abdel-Karim Zaid , Ihsane Kouchou , Alexandra Voulgari , Ousmane Sy , Ibrahima Sakho , Soo Boon Ng , Patrick Charland , Angélique Létourneau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tine.2025.100264\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>This study compares primary school teachers' beliefs in neuromyths related to brain function and learning across different cultural and linguistic contexts. Two main research questions are explored and analyzed: “Which neuromyths are believed by primary school teachers?” And “What are the formal and informal sources of these neuromyths among primary school teachers?”</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Data were collected from 1257 primary school teachers in 11 countries using the Multilingual Neuromyths Identification Questionnaire, available in eight languages. The descriptive survey design explored the prevalence of neuromyths and the sources that shape teachers' understanding of learning and intelligence.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The findings indicate that 13 out of 21 neuromyths are prevalent in all of the countries that were surveyed. Notably, over 90 % of participants agreed with the theories of multiple intelligences and learning styles. These misconceptions are primarily acquired through formal sources, such as teacher training programmes and professional seminars, as well as through professional experience and personal intuition. In contrast, informal sources, such as the media and popular culture, appear to play a minor role in developing these beliefs.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The persistence of neuromyths among teachers underscores a critical need for evidence-based neuroscience and cognitive psychology content in teacher education. This study underscores the urgent need to integrate evidence-based neuroscience and cognitive psychology into teacher education programs. The widespread belief in neuromyths highlights serious gaps in current educational policy and practice. To address this, coordinated national and international strategies are needed to inform ministries of education and policy makers about the prevalence and impact of these misconceptions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46228,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"volume\":\"40 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100264\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trends in Neuroscience and Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949325000183\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949325000183","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Belief in neuromyths among primary school teachers: A cross-national study of 11 countries
Background
This study compares primary school teachers' beliefs in neuromyths related to brain function and learning across different cultural and linguistic contexts. Two main research questions are explored and analyzed: “Which neuromyths are believed by primary school teachers?” And “What are the formal and informal sources of these neuromyths among primary school teachers?”
Methods
Data were collected from 1257 primary school teachers in 11 countries using the Multilingual Neuromyths Identification Questionnaire, available in eight languages. The descriptive survey design explored the prevalence of neuromyths and the sources that shape teachers' understanding of learning and intelligence.
Results
The findings indicate that 13 out of 21 neuromyths are prevalent in all of the countries that were surveyed. Notably, over 90 % of participants agreed with the theories of multiple intelligences and learning styles. These misconceptions are primarily acquired through formal sources, such as teacher training programmes and professional seminars, as well as through professional experience and personal intuition. In contrast, informal sources, such as the media and popular culture, appear to play a minor role in developing these beliefs.
Conclusions
The persistence of neuromyths among teachers underscores a critical need for evidence-based neuroscience and cognitive psychology content in teacher education. This study underscores the urgent need to integrate evidence-based neuroscience and cognitive psychology into teacher education programs. The widespread belief in neuromyths highlights serious gaps in current educational policy and practice. To address this, coordinated national and international strategies are needed to inform ministries of education and policy makers about the prevalence and impact of these misconceptions.