能源安全对能源效率的影响:基于政府干预的调节效应

IF 8.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Zeng Wenling , Dong Lu , Zhao Shouguo (Professor and Doctoral Supervisor)
{"title":"能源安全对能源效率的影响:基于政府干预的调节效应","authors":"Zeng Wenling ,&nbsp;Dong Lu ,&nbsp;Zhao Shouguo (Professor and Doctoral Supervisor)","doi":"10.1016/j.eap.2025.07.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Energy security (ES) is the cornerstone of a stable and efficient economic operation. Its coordination with energy efficiency (EE) is the key to solving the contradictions in the current \"energy-environment-economy\" system. Based on this, this paper utilizes China's provincial panel data from 2000 to 2022 to systematically evaluate the effects of ES and government intervention on EE and to identify the regulatory mechanism between the two. The study found a significant negative correlation between ES and EE, indicating that under certain conditions, improving ES may hinder efficiency growth. Government intervention plays a significant buffering role in this process, helping to achieve the coordination of ES and EE. Mechanism analysis reveals that ES indirectly hinders EE through the solidification of industrial structures and the crowding-out effect of green technology innovation. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the adverse effect of ES is relatively weak in the eastern region, where an optimized energy structure and improved institutional environment are present.In contrast, the central and western regions, as well as resource-rich regions, are constrained by resource dependence and path dependence, resulting in more significant efficiency inhibition. However, government intervention can effectively alleviate this adverse effect. This study provides theoretical support and policy inspiration for transforming ES into a positive force that promotes sustainable economic development through government intervention tailored to local conditions, as well as for developing economies to coordinate security and efficiency goals during the energy transformation process.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54200,"journal":{"name":"Economic Analysis and Policy","volume":"87 ","pages":"Pages 1653-1669"},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact of energy security on energy efficiency: based on the moderating effect of government intervention\",\"authors\":\"Zeng Wenling ,&nbsp;Dong Lu ,&nbsp;Zhao Shouguo (Professor and Doctoral Supervisor)\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eap.2025.07.037\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Energy security (ES) is the cornerstone of a stable and efficient economic operation. Its coordination with energy efficiency (EE) is the key to solving the contradictions in the current \\\"energy-environment-economy\\\" system. Based on this, this paper utilizes China's provincial panel data from 2000 to 2022 to systematically evaluate the effects of ES and government intervention on EE and to identify the regulatory mechanism between the two. The study found a significant negative correlation between ES and EE, indicating that under certain conditions, improving ES may hinder efficiency growth. Government intervention plays a significant buffering role in this process, helping to achieve the coordination of ES and EE. Mechanism analysis reveals that ES indirectly hinders EE through the solidification of industrial structures and the crowding-out effect of green technology innovation. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the adverse effect of ES is relatively weak in the eastern region, where an optimized energy structure and improved institutional environment are present.In contrast, the central and western regions, as well as resource-rich regions, are constrained by resource dependence and path dependence, resulting in more significant efficiency inhibition. However, government intervention can effectively alleviate this adverse effect. This study provides theoretical support and policy inspiration for transforming ES into a positive force that promotes sustainable economic development through government intervention tailored to local conditions, as well as for developing economies to coordinate security and efficiency goals during the energy transformation process.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54200,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"volume\":\"87 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 1653-1669\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Analysis and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031359262500311X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Analysis and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S031359262500311X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

能源安全是经济稳定高效运行的基石。它与能源效率的协调是解决当前“能源-环境-经济”体系矛盾的关键。在此基础上,本文利用中国2000 - 2022年的省级面板数据,系统评价了企业环境绩效和政府干预对企业环境绩效的影响,并识别了两者之间的调控机制。研究发现ES与EE之间存在显著的负相关关系,说明在一定条件下,ES的提高可能会阻碍效率的增长。在这一过程中,政府干预起到了重要的缓冲作用,有助于实现生态环境与生态环境的协调。机理分析表明,绿色环境通过产业结构固化和绿色技术创新的挤出效应间接阻碍了绿色环境的发展。异质性分析进一步表明,东部地区能源结构优化,制度环境改善,ES的不利影响相对较弱。而中西部地区和资源富集区受资源依赖和路径依赖的制约,效率抑制更为显著。然而,政府干预可以有效地缓解这种不利影响。本研究为通过因地制宜的政府干预,将可再生能源转化为促进经济可持续发展的积极力量,以及为发展中经济体在能源转型过程中协调安全和效率目标提供理论支持和政策启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The impact of energy security on energy efficiency: based on the moderating effect of government intervention
Energy security (ES) is the cornerstone of a stable and efficient economic operation. Its coordination with energy efficiency (EE) is the key to solving the contradictions in the current "energy-environment-economy" system. Based on this, this paper utilizes China's provincial panel data from 2000 to 2022 to systematically evaluate the effects of ES and government intervention on EE and to identify the regulatory mechanism between the two. The study found a significant negative correlation between ES and EE, indicating that under certain conditions, improving ES may hinder efficiency growth. Government intervention plays a significant buffering role in this process, helping to achieve the coordination of ES and EE. Mechanism analysis reveals that ES indirectly hinders EE through the solidification of industrial structures and the crowding-out effect of green technology innovation. Heterogeneity analysis further reveals that the adverse effect of ES is relatively weak in the eastern region, where an optimized energy structure and improved institutional environment are present.In contrast, the central and western regions, as well as resource-rich regions, are constrained by resource dependence and path dependence, resulting in more significant efficiency inhibition. However, government intervention can effectively alleviate this adverse effect. This study provides theoretical support and policy inspiration for transforming ES into a positive force that promotes sustainable economic development through government intervention tailored to local conditions, as well as for developing economies to coordinate security and efficiency goals during the energy transformation process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
9.20%
发文量
231
审稿时长
93 days
期刊介绍: Economic Analysis and Policy (established 1970) publishes articles from all branches of economics with a particular focus on research, theoretical and applied, which has strong policy relevance. The journal also publishes survey articles and empirical replications on key policy issues. Authors are expected to highlight the main insights in a non-technical introduction and in the conclusion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信