Iryna Siora , Lyudmyla Andriyko , Igor Gerashchenko , Mykola Вorysenko , Eugen Pakhlov , Olena Oranska , Yurii Lytvynenko , Mykola Tsyba , Ruslan Odynchenko , Olena Goncharuk
{"title":"天然沸石与合成沸石的结构特征及吸附性能比较研究","authors":"Iryna Siora , Lyudmyla Andriyko , Igor Gerashchenko , Mykola Вorysenko , Eugen Pakhlov , Olena Oranska , Yurii Lytvynenko , Mykola Tsyba , Ruslan Odynchenko , Olena Goncharuk","doi":"10.1016/j.micromeso.2025.113778","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A comparative study was conducted on the structural and adsorption properties of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite), commercial dietary supplements based on it, subjected to mechanical and tribomechanical activation, and synthetic zeolites NaA and NaX. Structural characterization was carried out using XRD, FTIR spectroscopy, SEM, porometry, and low-temperature nitrogen adsorption. Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin models were used to evaluate the adsorption mechanism. Clinoptilolite was identified as the dominant crystalline phase (up to 70 %) in natural and activated samples, whereas NaA and NaX exhibited LTA- and FAU-type frameworks, respectively. The SSA ranged from 13.5 m<sup>2</sup>/g for natural zeolite to 27.8 m<sup>2</sup>/g for the activated samples, and reached 460.7 m<sup>2</sup>/g for the synthetic zeolite NaX. Tribomechanically activated zeolites exhibited pronounced mesoporosity (up to 98.6 %) with an average pore radius of 5.4–6.6 nm. According to the Langmuir model (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.997), the q<sub>max</sub> for Cu<sup>2+</sup> were 55.3–59.2 mg g<sup>−1</sup> for NaA and NaX, 10.1 mg g<sup>−1</sup> for natural zeolite, and 7.2 mg g<sup>−1</sup> for activated samples. In contrast, Methylene blue was more effectively adsorbed by natural and activated zeolites (q<sub>max</sub> are from 13.2 to 34.3 mg g<sup>−1</sup>, respectively), while NaA and NaX showed much lower uptake (6.9 mg g<sup>−1</sup>). Congo red adsorption was less efficient for all samples. Adsorption of proteins occurred mainly on the external surfaces of zeolite particles, with q<sub>max</sub> reaching 96.2 mg g<sup>−1</sup> (gelatin) and 112.4 mg g<sup>−1</sup> (ovalbumin) for activated zeolites. Thus, synthetic zeolites are more effective for metal ion removal, while modified natural zeolites are more effective for low-molecular-weight compounds and protein adsorption, supporting their potential use as multifunctional enterosorbents.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":392,"journal":{"name":"Microporous and Mesoporous Materials","volume":"397 ","pages":"Article 113778"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of the structural characteristics and adsorption capacity of natural and synthetic zeolites\",\"authors\":\"Iryna Siora , Lyudmyla Andriyko , Igor Gerashchenko , Mykola Вorysenko , Eugen Pakhlov , Olena Oranska , Yurii Lytvynenko , Mykola Tsyba , Ruslan Odynchenko , Olena Goncharuk\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.micromeso.2025.113778\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A comparative study was conducted on the structural and adsorption properties of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite), commercial dietary supplements based on it, subjected to mechanical and tribomechanical activation, and synthetic zeolites NaA and NaX. Structural characterization was carried out using XRD, FTIR spectroscopy, SEM, porometry, and low-temperature nitrogen adsorption. Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin models were used to evaluate the adsorption mechanism. Clinoptilolite was identified as the dominant crystalline phase (up to 70 %) in natural and activated samples, whereas NaA and NaX exhibited LTA- and FAU-type frameworks, respectively. The SSA ranged from 13.5 m<sup>2</sup>/g for natural zeolite to 27.8 m<sup>2</sup>/g for the activated samples, and reached 460.7 m<sup>2</sup>/g for the synthetic zeolite NaX. Tribomechanically activated zeolites exhibited pronounced mesoporosity (up to 98.6 %) with an average pore radius of 5.4–6.6 nm. According to the Langmuir model (R<sup>2</sup> ≥ 0.997), the q<sub>max</sub> for Cu<sup>2+</sup> were 55.3–59.2 mg g<sup>−1</sup> for NaA and NaX, 10.1 mg g<sup>−1</sup> for natural zeolite, and 7.2 mg g<sup>−1</sup> for activated samples. In contrast, Methylene blue was more effectively adsorbed by natural and activated zeolites (q<sub>max</sub> are from 13.2 to 34.3 mg g<sup>−1</sup>, respectively), while NaA and NaX showed much lower uptake (6.9 mg g<sup>−1</sup>). Congo red adsorption was less efficient for all samples. Adsorption of proteins occurred mainly on the external surfaces of zeolite particles, with q<sub>max</sub> reaching 96.2 mg g<sup>−1</sup> (gelatin) and 112.4 mg g<sup>−1</sup> (ovalbumin) for activated zeolites. Thus, synthetic zeolites are more effective for metal ion removal, while modified natural zeolites are more effective for low-molecular-weight compounds and protein adsorption, supporting their potential use as multifunctional enterosorbents.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microporous and Mesoporous Materials\",\"volume\":\"397 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113778\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microporous and Mesoporous Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"88\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387181125002938\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"材料科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microporous and Mesoporous Materials","FirstCategoryId":"88","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1387181125002938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"材料科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative study of the structural characteristics and adsorption capacity of natural and synthetic zeolites
A comparative study was conducted on the structural and adsorption properties of natural zeolite (clinoptilolite), commercial dietary supplements based on it, subjected to mechanical and tribomechanical activation, and synthetic zeolites NaA and NaX. Structural characterization was carried out using XRD, FTIR spectroscopy, SEM, porometry, and low-temperature nitrogen adsorption. Langmuir, Freundlich and Temkin models were used to evaluate the adsorption mechanism. Clinoptilolite was identified as the dominant crystalline phase (up to 70 %) in natural and activated samples, whereas NaA and NaX exhibited LTA- and FAU-type frameworks, respectively. The SSA ranged from 13.5 m2/g for natural zeolite to 27.8 m2/g for the activated samples, and reached 460.7 m2/g for the synthetic zeolite NaX. Tribomechanically activated zeolites exhibited pronounced mesoporosity (up to 98.6 %) with an average pore radius of 5.4–6.6 nm. According to the Langmuir model (R2 ≥ 0.997), the qmax for Cu2+ were 55.3–59.2 mg g−1 for NaA and NaX, 10.1 mg g−1 for natural zeolite, and 7.2 mg g−1 for activated samples. In contrast, Methylene blue was more effectively adsorbed by natural and activated zeolites (qmax are from 13.2 to 34.3 mg g−1, respectively), while NaA and NaX showed much lower uptake (6.9 mg g−1). Congo red adsorption was less efficient for all samples. Adsorption of proteins occurred mainly on the external surfaces of zeolite particles, with qmax reaching 96.2 mg g−1 (gelatin) and 112.4 mg g−1 (ovalbumin) for activated zeolites. Thus, synthetic zeolites are more effective for metal ion removal, while modified natural zeolites are more effective for low-molecular-weight compounds and protein adsorption, supporting their potential use as multifunctional enterosorbents.
期刊介绍:
Microporous and Mesoporous Materials covers novel and significant aspects of porous solids classified as either microporous (pore size up to 2 nm) or mesoporous (pore size 2 to 50 nm). The porosity should have a specific impact on the material properties or application. Typical examples are zeolites and zeolite-like materials, pillared materials, clathrasils and clathrates, carbon molecular sieves, ordered mesoporous materials, organic/inorganic porous hybrid materials, or porous metal oxides. Both natural and synthetic porous materials are within the scope of the journal.
Topics which are particularly of interest include:
All aspects of natural microporous and mesoporous solids
The synthesis of crystalline or amorphous porous materials
The physico-chemical characterization of microporous and mesoporous solids, especially spectroscopic and microscopic
The modification of microporous and mesoporous solids, for example by ion exchange or solid-state reactions
All topics related to diffusion of mobile species in the pores of microporous and mesoporous materials
Adsorption (and other separation techniques) using microporous or mesoporous adsorbents
Catalysis by microporous and mesoporous materials
Host/guest interactions
Theoretical chemistry and modelling of host/guest interactions
All topics related to the application of microporous and mesoporous materials in industrial catalysis, separation technology, environmental protection, electrochemistry, membranes, sensors, optical devices, etc.