{"title":"个人主义与对COVID-19政府干预的支持:感知经济风险的调节作用","authors":"Ying Jiang , Guikun Yin , Qinglong Shao","doi":"10.1016/j.ehb.2025.101513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Individualistic orientations in cultural worldviews significantly influence public attitudes toward government policies. We examine the impact and mechanisms of individualism on support for government interventions, focusing on the economic effects of COVID-19 containment measures. Utilizing data from the 10th and the latest 11th rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS), we find that individualism exerts a significant negative effect on public support for COVID-19 government interventions. Specifically, for each additional point increase in individualism corresponds to a 1.6 % decrease in the probability of viewing border closures as extremely important and a 1.4 % decrease for domestic movement restrictions. Our mechanism analysis reveals that individualism negatively affects intervention support by diminishing trust in government. Furthermore, higher perceived economic risk amplifies the negative impact of individualism on intervention support. Heterogeneity tests demonstrate that the negative influence of individualism is more pronounced among older individuals, those with lower income and education levels, employees in government and public sectors, and in non-post-socialist countries. We suggest that strategies to promote public policy support should be tailored to cultural and social contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50554,"journal":{"name":"Economics & Human Biology","volume":"58 ","pages":"Article 101513"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Individualism and support for COVID-19 government interventions: The moderating role of perceived economic risk\",\"authors\":\"Ying Jiang , Guikun Yin , Qinglong Shao\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ehb.2025.101513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Individualistic orientations in cultural worldviews significantly influence public attitudes toward government policies. We examine the impact and mechanisms of individualism on support for government interventions, focusing on the economic effects of COVID-19 containment measures. Utilizing data from the 10th and the latest 11th rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS), we find that individualism exerts a significant negative effect on public support for COVID-19 government interventions. Specifically, for each additional point increase in individualism corresponds to a 1.6 % decrease in the probability of viewing border closures as extremely important and a 1.4 % decrease for domestic movement restrictions. Our mechanism analysis reveals that individualism negatively affects intervention support by diminishing trust in government. Furthermore, higher perceived economic risk amplifies the negative impact of individualism on intervention support. Heterogeneity tests demonstrate that the negative influence of individualism is more pronounced among older individuals, those with lower income and education levels, employees in government and public sectors, and in non-post-socialist countries. We suggest that strategies to promote public policy support should be tailored to cultural and social contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50554,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economics & Human Biology\",\"volume\":\"58 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101513\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economics & Human Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X25000462\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics & Human Biology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1570677X25000462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Individualism and support for COVID-19 government interventions: The moderating role of perceived economic risk
Individualistic orientations in cultural worldviews significantly influence public attitudes toward government policies. We examine the impact and mechanisms of individualism on support for government interventions, focusing on the economic effects of COVID-19 containment measures. Utilizing data from the 10th and the latest 11th rounds of the European Social Survey (ESS), we find that individualism exerts a significant negative effect on public support for COVID-19 government interventions. Specifically, for each additional point increase in individualism corresponds to a 1.6 % decrease in the probability of viewing border closures as extremely important and a 1.4 % decrease for domestic movement restrictions. Our mechanism analysis reveals that individualism negatively affects intervention support by diminishing trust in government. Furthermore, higher perceived economic risk amplifies the negative impact of individualism on intervention support. Heterogeneity tests demonstrate that the negative influence of individualism is more pronounced among older individuals, those with lower income and education levels, employees in government and public sectors, and in non-post-socialist countries. We suggest that strategies to promote public policy support should be tailored to cultural and social contexts.
期刊介绍:
Economics and Human Biology is devoted to the exploration of the effect of socio-economic processes on human beings as biological organisms. Research covered in this (quarterly) interdisciplinary journal is not bound by temporal or geographic limitations.