从数据到影响:神经和神经外科国家登记的社会贡献

Tiffany Eatz , Chase DeLong , Ashley R. Metzler , Neil Patel , Ian A. Ramsay , Sai Sanikommu , Soumya Shrigiri , Ahmed Abdelsalam , Luis Guada , Michael A. Silva , Dileep R. Yavagal , Sebastian Koch , Robert M. Starke
{"title":"从数据到影响:神经和神经外科国家登记的社会贡献","authors":"Tiffany Eatz ,&nbsp;Chase DeLong ,&nbsp;Ashley R. Metzler ,&nbsp;Neil Patel ,&nbsp;Ian A. Ramsay ,&nbsp;Sai Sanikommu ,&nbsp;Soumya Shrigiri ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdelsalam ,&nbsp;Luis Guada ,&nbsp;Michael A. Silva ,&nbsp;Dileep R. Yavagal ,&nbsp;Sebastian Koch ,&nbsp;Robert M. Starke","doi":"10.1016/j.socimp.2025.100131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The creation of the electronic medical record (EMR) was one of the greatest advancements in medical documentation. It improved the efficiency and practicality of multi-patient research, such as retrospective case series and cohort studies. While EMRs made collecting and sharing patient data feasible, the subsequent advent of patient registries provided opportunities for rapid large-scale analysis. Most recently, specialty-specific registries have enabled the biomedical workforce to focus on certain diseases, particularly neurological and neurosurgical in nature. State and nation-wide analyses of these patients have combined geographic, demographic, patient presentation, and treatment information to identify disparities in care and patient outcomes. Further optimization and expansion of discipline-specific registries can improve data collection, research, and patient care, all while facilitating national collaboration that was not previously possible.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":101167,"journal":{"name":"Societal Impacts","volume":"6 ","pages":"Article 100131"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From data to impact: The societal contributions of neurological and neurosurgical national registries\",\"authors\":\"Tiffany Eatz ,&nbsp;Chase DeLong ,&nbsp;Ashley R. Metzler ,&nbsp;Neil Patel ,&nbsp;Ian A. Ramsay ,&nbsp;Sai Sanikommu ,&nbsp;Soumya Shrigiri ,&nbsp;Ahmed Abdelsalam ,&nbsp;Luis Guada ,&nbsp;Michael A. Silva ,&nbsp;Dileep R. Yavagal ,&nbsp;Sebastian Koch ,&nbsp;Robert M. Starke\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.socimp.2025.100131\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The creation of the electronic medical record (EMR) was one of the greatest advancements in medical documentation. It improved the efficiency and practicality of multi-patient research, such as retrospective case series and cohort studies. While EMRs made collecting and sharing patient data feasible, the subsequent advent of patient registries provided opportunities for rapid large-scale analysis. Most recently, specialty-specific registries have enabled the biomedical workforce to focus on certain diseases, particularly neurological and neurosurgical in nature. State and nation-wide analyses of these patients have combined geographic, demographic, patient presentation, and treatment information to identify disparities in care and patient outcomes. Further optimization and expansion of discipline-specific registries can improve data collection, research, and patient care, all while facilitating national collaboration that was not previously possible.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101167,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Societal Impacts\",\"volume\":\"6 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Societal Impacts\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294969772500030X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Societal Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S294969772500030X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子医疗记录(EMR)的创建是医疗文档中最伟大的进步之一。它提高了多患者研究的效率和实用性,如回顾性病例系列和队列研究。虽然电子病历使收集和共享患者数据成为可能,但随后出现的患者登记为快速大规模分析提供了机会。最近,专门登记使生物医学工作人员能够专注于某些疾病,特别是神经和神经外科疾病。对这些患者的州和全国范围的分析结合了地理、人口、患者表现和治疗信息,以确定护理和患者结果的差异。进一步优化和扩大特定学科的注册可以改善数据收集、研究和患者护理,同时促进以前不可能实现的国家合作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From data to impact: The societal contributions of neurological and neurosurgical national registries
The creation of the electronic medical record (EMR) was one of the greatest advancements in medical documentation. It improved the efficiency and practicality of multi-patient research, such as retrospective case series and cohort studies. While EMRs made collecting and sharing patient data feasible, the subsequent advent of patient registries provided opportunities for rapid large-scale analysis. Most recently, specialty-specific registries have enabled the biomedical workforce to focus on certain diseases, particularly neurological and neurosurgical in nature. State and nation-wide analyses of these patients have combined geographic, demographic, patient presentation, and treatment information to identify disparities in care and patient outcomes. Further optimization and expansion of discipline-specific registries can improve data collection, research, and patient care, all while facilitating national collaboration that was not previously possible.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信