Nianbo Dong , Keith Herman , Benjamin Kelcey , Sirui Ren , Wendy Reinke , Jessaca Spybrook
{"title":"研究情境、身份和文化在干预研究中的作用的因果调节分析的实用指南","authors":"Nianbo Dong , Keith Herman , Benjamin Kelcey , Sirui Ren , Wendy Reinke , Jessaca Spybrook","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Contextual, identity, and cultural factors are not only associated with student outcomes but can also serve to moderate the effects of interventions. However, the conventional analysis of moderation commonly used in school psychology is subject to the selection bias potentially introducing bias into estimated moderator effects. This article provides a tutorial on the application of a recently developed framework for causal moderation effects within the context of investigating contextual, identity, and cultural effects in intervention research. Using an example that focuses on the effectiveness of a teacher classroom management program in improving students' social and behavioral outcomes, we demonstrate the application of the (stabilized) Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting method to investigate heterogeneous treatment effects. The analysis aims to scrutinize not only the Average Moderated Treatment Effect (AMTE) across the whole sample but also the Average Moderated Treatment Effects on Targeted Subgroups (AMTS). Finally, we discuss our findings and conclude with suggestions for the application of causal moderation analysis.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"111 ","pages":"Article 101473"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A practical guide to causal moderation analysis for investigating the role of context, identity, and culture in intervention research\",\"authors\":\"Nianbo Dong , Keith Herman , Benjamin Kelcey , Sirui Ren , Wendy Reinke , Jessaca Spybrook\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Contextual, identity, and cultural factors are not only associated with student outcomes but can also serve to moderate the effects of interventions. However, the conventional analysis of moderation commonly used in school psychology is subject to the selection bias potentially introducing bias into estimated moderator effects. This article provides a tutorial on the application of a recently developed framework for causal moderation effects within the context of investigating contextual, identity, and cultural effects in intervention research. Using an example that focuses on the effectiveness of a teacher classroom management program in improving students' social and behavioral outcomes, we demonstrate the application of the (stabilized) Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting method to investigate heterogeneous treatment effects. The analysis aims to scrutinize not only the Average Moderated Treatment Effect (AMTE) across the whole sample but also the Average Moderated Treatment Effects on Targeted Subgroups (AMTS). Finally, we discuss our findings and conclude with suggestions for the application of causal moderation analysis.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"volume\":\"111 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101473\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440525000469\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440525000469","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
A practical guide to causal moderation analysis for investigating the role of context, identity, and culture in intervention research
Contextual, identity, and cultural factors are not only associated with student outcomes but can also serve to moderate the effects of interventions. However, the conventional analysis of moderation commonly used in school psychology is subject to the selection bias potentially introducing bias into estimated moderator effects. This article provides a tutorial on the application of a recently developed framework for causal moderation effects within the context of investigating contextual, identity, and cultural effects in intervention research. Using an example that focuses on the effectiveness of a teacher classroom management program in improving students' social and behavioral outcomes, we demonstrate the application of the (stabilized) Inverse Probability Treatment Weighting method to investigate heterogeneous treatment effects. The analysis aims to scrutinize not only the Average Moderated Treatment Effect (AMTE) across the whole sample but also the Average Moderated Treatment Effects on Targeted Subgroups (AMTS). Finally, we discuss our findings and conclude with suggestions for the application of causal moderation analysis.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.