关键产业政策、市场竞争与企业加价:来自中国的证据

IF 4.7 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Guifu Chen, Hongwei Yuan
{"title":"关键产业政策、市场竞争与企业加价:来自中国的证据","authors":"Guifu Chen,&nbsp;Hongwei Yuan","doi":"10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107245","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The relationship between the government and the market has long been a core issue in economics. This study analyzes key industrial policy information in the “Five-Year Plan” of the Chinese central government. We use data from the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms to test the impact and mechanisms of key industrial policies on markups, and further analyze these findings. The empirical results demonstrate that key industrial policies significantly reduce firms' markups, and this conclusion remains robust across different tests. Additionally, the mechanism by which key industrial policy reduces firms’ markups is primarily through the “transaction cost channel,” the “factor resource cost channel” and “market competition effect.” For different types of firms, industrial policies have heterogeneous effects on markups, with key industrial policies having noticeable asymmetric effects on firms occupying different positions in the market. Our findings provide further insights into the interaction mechanisms between the government and the market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48419,"journal":{"name":"Economic Modelling","volume":"151 ","pages":"Article 107245"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Key industrial policy, market competition and firms’ markup: Evidence from China\",\"authors\":\"Guifu Chen,&nbsp;Hongwei Yuan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econmod.2025.107245\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The relationship between the government and the market has long been a core issue in economics. This study analyzes key industrial policy information in the “Five-Year Plan” of the Chinese central government. We use data from the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms to test the impact and mechanisms of key industrial policies on markups, and further analyze these findings. The empirical results demonstrate that key industrial policies significantly reduce firms' markups, and this conclusion remains robust across different tests. Additionally, the mechanism by which key industrial policy reduces firms’ markups is primarily through the “transaction cost channel,” the “factor resource cost channel” and “market competition effect.” For different types of firms, industrial policies have heterogeneous effects on markups, with key industrial policies having noticeable asymmetric effects on firms occupying different positions in the market. Our findings provide further insights into the interaction mechanisms between the government and the market.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48419,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"volume\":\"151 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107245\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Economic Modelling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325002408\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economic Modelling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264999325002408","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

长期以来,政府与市场的关系一直是经济学的核心问题。本研究分析了中国中央政府“五年计划”中的关键产业政策信息。我们使用《工业企业年度调查》的数据来检验关键产业政策对加价的影响和机制,并进一步分析这些发现。实证结果表明,关键的产业政策显著降低了企业的加价,这一结论在不同的测试中仍然是稳健的。此外,关键产业政策降低企业加价的机制主要是通过“交易成本渠道”、“要素资源成本渠道”和“市场竞争效应”。对于不同类型的企业,产业政策对加价的影响存在异质性,关键产业政策对不同市场地位的企业具有显著的不对称效应。我们的研究结果进一步揭示了政府与市场之间的互动机制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Key industrial policy, market competition and firms’ markup: Evidence from China
The relationship between the government and the market has long been a core issue in economics. This study analyzes key industrial policy information in the “Five-Year Plan” of the Chinese central government. We use data from the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms to test the impact and mechanisms of key industrial policies on markups, and further analyze these findings. The empirical results demonstrate that key industrial policies significantly reduce firms' markups, and this conclusion remains robust across different tests. Additionally, the mechanism by which key industrial policy reduces firms’ markups is primarily through the “transaction cost channel,” the “factor resource cost channel” and “market competition effect.” For different types of firms, industrial policies have heterogeneous effects on markups, with key industrial policies having noticeable asymmetric effects on firms occupying different positions in the market. Our findings provide further insights into the interaction mechanisms between the government and the market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Economic Modelling
Economic Modelling ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
10.60%
发文量
295
期刊介绍: Economic Modelling fills a major gap in the economics literature, providing a single source of both theoretical and applied papers on economic modelling. The journal prime objective is to provide an international review of the state-of-the-art in economic modelling. Economic Modelling publishes the complete versions of many large-scale models of industrially advanced economies which have been developed for policy analysis. Examples are the Bank of England Model and the US Federal Reserve Board Model which had hitherto been unpublished. As individual models are revised and updated, the journal publishes subsequent papers dealing with these revisions, so keeping its readers as up to date as possible.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信