碳定价与股票表现:碳价格是否已经比能源价格更具影响力?

IF 9.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
David C. Broadstock , Roger Fouquet , Jeong Won Kim
{"title":"碳定价与股票表现:碳价格是否已经比能源价格更具影响力?","authors":"David C. Broadstock ,&nbsp;Roger Fouquet ,&nbsp;Jeong Won Kim","doi":"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper assesses the relationship between carbon prices and the financial value of United Kingdom companies. It shows that the financial market co-moves with the UK-ETS at least as much as it does with other major energy commodities (i.e., oil, gas and electricity prices), and carbon prices are becoming the single most important energy or environmental variable to consider in determining corporate value. The results indicate that 14.1 % of total market capitalisation is exposed to carbon pricing ‘risk’, 20 % or more of the time. The Energy sector has the largest exposure with £251bn (41.51 % of this sector) exposed at least 20 % of the time. This is equivalent to one-twelfth of the economy’s GDP. Within the Energy sector, 13.5 % of all observations indicate net-positive relationship between carbon pricing and stock returns - these are likely to be associated with low carbon energy sources and technologies. The Financial sector is the second most affected sector with £117bn exposed to carbon pricing at least 20 % of the time. Finally, it is shown that information on ‘carbon sensitivity’ can be utilised to construct investment portfolios wherein carbon sensitive stocks under-perform against the market, while carbon insensitive (‘immune’) stocks closely track market benchmarks, depending on investment weighting strategy.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11672,"journal":{"name":"Energy Policy","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 114775"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Carbon pricing and stock performance: Are carbon prices already more influential than energy prices?\",\"authors\":\"David C. Broadstock ,&nbsp;Roger Fouquet ,&nbsp;Jeong Won Kim\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.enpol.2025.114775\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper assesses the relationship between carbon prices and the financial value of United Kingdom companies. It shows that the financial market co-moves with the UK-ETS at least as much as it does with other major energy commodities (i.e., oil, gas and electricity prices), and carbon prices are becoming the single most important energy or environmental variable to consider in determining corporate value. The results indicate that 14.1 % of total market capitalisation is exposed to carbon pricing ‘risk’, 20 % or more of the time. The Energy sector has the largest exposure with £251bn (41.51 % of this sector) exposed at least 20 % of the time. This is equivalent to one-twelfth of the economy’s GDP. Within the Energy sector, 13.5 % of all observations indicate net-positive relationship between carbon pricing and stock returns - these are likely to be associated with low carbon energy sources and technologies. The Financial sector is the second most affected sector with £117bn exposed to carbon pricing at least 20 % of the time. Finally, it is shown that information on ‘carbon sensitivity’ can be utilised to construct investment portfolios wherein carbon sensitive stocks under-perform against the market, while carbon insensitive (‘immune’) stocks closely track market benchmarks, depending on investment weighting strategy.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11672,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Policy\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"Article 114775\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":9.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002824\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301421525002824","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文评估了碳价格与英国公司财务价值之间的关系。它表明,金融市场与英国碳排放交易体系(UK-ETS)的共同变动至少与其他主要能源商品(即石油、天然气和电力价格)的共同变动一样多,而碳价格正在成为确定企业价值时考虑的最重要的能源或环境变量。结果表明,14.1 %的总市值暴露于碳定价“风险”,20% %或更多的时间。能源部门的风险敞口最大,达到2510亿英镑(41.51% %),至少有20% %的风险敞口。这相当于经济GDP的十二分之一。在能源部门,13.5 %的观察结果表明,碳定价与股票回报之间存在净正相关关系——这可能与低碳能源和技术有关。金融行业是受影响第二大的行业,有1170亿英镑受到至少20% 的碳定价影响。最后,研究表明,关于“碳敏感性”的信息可以用来构建投资组合,其中碳敏感性股票相对于市场表现不佳,而碳不敏感(“免疫”)股票密切跟踪市场基准,这取决于投资权重策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Carbon pricing and stock performance: Are carbon prices already more influential than energy prices?
This paper assesses the relationship between carbon prices and the financial value of United Kingdom companies. It shows that the financial market co-moves with the UK-ETS at least as much as it does with other major energy commodities (i.e., oil, gas and electricity prices), and carbon prices are becoming the single most important energy or environmental variable to consider in determining corporate value. The results indicate that 14.1 % of total market capitalisation is exposed to carbon pricing ‘risk’, 20 % or more of the time. The Energy sector has the largest exposure with £251bn (41.51 % of this sector) exposed at least 20 % of the time. This is equivalent to one-twelfth of the economy’s GDP. Within the Energy sector, 13.5 % of all observations indicate net-positive relationship between carbon pricing and stock returns - these are likely to be associated with low carbon energy sources and technologies. The Financial sector is the second most affected sector with £117bn exposed to carbon pricing at least 20 % of the time. Finally, it is shown that information on ‘carbon sensitivity’ can be utilised to construct investment portfolios wherein carbon sensitive stocks under-perform against the market, while carbon insensitive (‘immune’) stocks closely track market benchmarks, depending on investment weighting strategy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Policy
Energy Policy 管理科学-环境科学
CiteScore
17.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
540
审稿时长
7.9 months
期刊介绍: Energy policy is the manner in which a given entity (often governmental) has decided to address issues of energy development including energy conversion, distribution and use as well as reduction of greenhouse gas emissions in order to contribute to climate change mitigation. The attributes of energy policy may include legislation, international treaties, incentives to investment, guidelines for energy conservation, taxation and other public policy techniques. Energy policy is closely related to climate change policy because totalled worldwide the energy sector emits more greenhouse gas than other sectors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信