Isaiah K Mensah,Vahid Azimi,Christopher W Farnsworth
{"title":"在儿科住院患者中,连续血糖监测仪具有可接受的准确性,但在高血糖和低血糖浓度时存在高不一致性。","authors":"Isaiah K Mensah,Vahid Azimi,Christopher W Farnsworth","doi":"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nContinuous glucose monitors (CGMs) assess interstitial glucose concentrations and improve diabetes management in outpatient settings. However, limited studies have assessed CGM performance in hospitalized pediatric patients, especially at high and low glucose thresholds near clinical decision limits.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThis retrospective study included 72 hospitalized pediatric patients with dysglycemia who used CGMs during hospitalization. Paired CGM results within 10 min of laboratory (Lab) and point-of-care (POC) glucose results were retrieved. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and percentage of glucose values in acceptable Parkes error zones were assessed. Concordance of CGM and POC results and the frequency that CGM results <70 mg/dL and >180 mg/dL were confirmed (-15 min to +30 min) using POC was assessed.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nThere were 2228 paired CGM and Lab or POC glucose results with a MARD of 14.8%, and 99.2% of results were in Parkes zones A and B. The MARD was 20.2% and 13.6% in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. The MARD for POC glucose meters was 15.6% and 8.2% for the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. The Cohen kappa between CGM and POC was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.69). CGM results in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges were repeated 80.2% and 16.5% of the time, respectively, with POC methods.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nThe MARD of CGM in hospitalized pediatric patients is clinically acceptable but there is high discordance between CGM and POC. This implies a clinical need to confirm high and low glucose concentrations with Lab or POC methods but confirmatory testing is commonly not performed.","PeriodicalId":10690,"journal":{"name":"Clinical chemistry","volume":"55 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Continuous Glucose Monitors Have Acceptable Accuracy but High Discordance at High and Low Glucose Concentrations in Pediatric Hospitalized Patients.\",\"authors\":\"Isaiah K Mensah,Vahid Azimi,Christopher W Farnsworth\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/clinchem/hvaf080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\r\\nContinuous glucose monitors (CGMs) assess interstitial glucose concentrations and improve diabetes management in outpatient settings. However, limited studies have assessed CGM performance in hospitalized pediatric patients, especially at high and low glucose thresholds near clinical decision limits.\\r\\n\\r\\nMETHODS\\r\\nThis retrospective study included 72 hospitalized pediatric patients with dysglycemia who used CGMs during hospitalization. Paired CGM results within 10 min of laboratory (Lab) and point-of-care (POC) glucose results were retrieved. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and percentage of glucose values in acceptable Parkes error zones were assessed. Concordance of CGM and POC results and the frequency that CGM results <70 mg/dL and >180 mg/dL were confirmed (-15 min to +30 min) using POC was assessed.\\r\\n\\r\\nRESULTS\\r\\nThere were 2228 paired CGM and Lab or POC glucose results with a MARD of 14.8%, and 99.2% of results were in Parkes zones A and B. The MARD was 20.2% and 13.6% in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. The MARD for POC glucose meters was 15.6% and 8.2% for the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. The Cohen kappa between CGM and POC was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.69). CGM results in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges were repeated 80.2% and 16.5% of the time, respectively, with POC methods.\\r\\n\\r\\nCONCLUSION\\r\\nThe MARD of CGM in hospitalized pediatric patients is clinically acceptable but there is high discordance between CGM and POC. This implies a clinical need to confirm high and low glucose concentrations with Lab or POC methods but confirmatory testing is commonly not performed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf080\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/hvaf080","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Continuous Glucose Monitors Have Acceptable Accuracy but High Discordance at High and Low Glucose Concentrations in Pediatric Hospitalized Patients.
BACKGROUND
Continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) assess interstitial glucose concentrations and improve diabetes management in outpatient settings. However, limited studies have assessed CGM performance in hospitalized pediatric patients, especially at high and low glucose thresholds near clinical decision limits.
METHODS
This retrospective study included 72 hospitalized pediatric patients with dysglycemia who used CGMs during hospitalization. Paired CGM results within 10 min of laboratory (Lab) and point-of-care (POC) glucose results were retrieved. The mean absolute relative difference (MARD) and percentage of glucose values in acceptable Parkes error zones were assessed. Concordance of CGM and POC results and the frequency that CGM results <70 mg/dL and >180 mg/dL were confirmed (-15 min to +30 min) using POC was assessed.
RESULTS
There were 2228 paired CGM and Lab or POC glucose results with a MARD of 14.8%, and 99.2% of results were in Parkes zones A and B. The MARD was 20.2% and 13.6% in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. The MARD for POC glucose meters was 15.6% and 8.2% for the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges. The Cohen kappa between CGM and POC was 0.66 (95% CI, 0.63-0.69). CGM results in the hypoglycemic and hyperglycemic ranges were repeated 80.2% and 16.5% of the time, respectively, with POC methods.
CONCLUSION
The MARD of CGM in hospitalized pediatric patients is clinically acceptable but there is high discordance between CGM and POC. This implies a clinical need to confirm high and low glucose concentrations with Lab or POC methods but confirmatory testing is commonly not performed.
期刊介绍:
Clinical Chemistry is a peer-reviewed scientific journal that is the premier publication for the science and practice of clinical laboratory medicine. It was established in 1955 and is associated with the Association for Diagnostics & Laboratory Medicine (ADLM).
The journal focuses on laboratory diagnosis and management of patients, and has expanded to include other clinical laboratory disciplines such as genomics, hematology, microbiology, and toxicology. It also publishes articles relevant to clinical specialties including cardiology, endocrinology, gastroenterology, genetics, immunology, infectious diseases, maternal-fetal medicine, neurology, nutrition, oncology, and pediatrics.
In addition to original research, editorials, and reviews, Clinical Chemistry features recurring sections such as clinical case studies, perspectives, podcasts, and Q&A articles. It has the highest impact factor among journals of clinical chemistry, laboratory medicine, pathology, analytical chemistry, transfusion medicine, and clinical microbiology.
The journal is indexed in databases such as MEDLINE and Web of Science.