Eirini Beneki, Kyriakos Dimitriadis, Nikolaos Pyrpyris, Georgios Tzimas, Ioannis Skalidis, David Meier, Panagiotis Antiochos, Panagiotis Kostakis, Efthymia Pavlou, Francesco Perone, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Constantina Aggeli, Ole de Backer, Konstantinos Tsioufis
{"title":"经导管卵圆孔未闭后抗血栓治疗的不确定性:全面回顾。","authors":"Eirini Beneki, Kyriakos Dimitriadis, Nikolaos Pyrpyris, Georgios Tzimas, Ioannis Skalidis, David Meier, Panagiotis Antiochos, Panagiotis Kostakis, Efthymia Pavlou, Francesco Perone, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Constantina Aggeli, Ole de Backer, Konstantinos Tsioufis","doi":"10.1002/ccd.70049","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The patent foramen ovale (PFO), present in 25% of the population, can cause paradoxical embolism and stroke. Transcatheter PFO closure is the gold standard for recurrent embolism with significant inter-atrial shunting, with recent trials confirming its superiority in reducing ischemic stroke recurrence over medical therapy. However, device-related thrombosis remains a concern, posing risks of systemic embolism and neurological events. Optimal post-closure antithrombotic management, including the choice and duration of therapy, remains unclear. Recommendations suggest transient dual antiplatelet therapy followed by long-term single therapy, but robust evidence is lacking, especially regarding device neo-endothelization timelines. Current studies often lack long-term follow-up, leaving gaps in understanding the incidence and prevention of thrombosis. Future research is crucial to provide evidence-based guidance and refine personalized treatment strategies for better outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":520583,"journal":{"name":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Navigating the Uncertainties of Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A Comprehensive Review.\",\"authors\":\"Eirini Beneki, Kyriakos Dimitriadis, Nikolaos Pyrpyris, Georgios Tzimas, Ioannis Skalidis, David Meier, Panagiotis Antiochos, Panagiotis Kostakis, Efthymia Pavlou, Francesco Perone, Georgios Tsivgoulis, Constantina Aggeli, Ole de Backer, Konstantinos Tsioufis\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ccd.70049\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>The patent foramen ovale (PFO), present in 25% of the population, can cause paradoxical embolism and stroke. Transcatheter PFO closure is the gold standard for recurrent embolism with significant inter-atrial shunting, with recent trials confirming its superiority in reducing ischemic stroke recurrence over medical therapy. However, device-related thrombosis remains a concern, posing risks of systemic embolism and neurological events. Optimal post-closure antithrombotic management, including the choice and duration of therapy, remains unclear. Recommendations suggest transient dual antiplatelet therapy followed by long-term single therapy, but robust evidence is lacking, especially regarding device neo-endothelization timelines. Current studies often lack long-term follow-up, leaving gaps in understanding the incidence and prevention of thrombosis. Future research is crucial to provide evidence-based guidance and refine personalized treatment strategies for better outcomes.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":520583,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70049\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.70049","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Navigating the Uncertainties of Antithrombotic Therapy After Transcatheter Patent Foramen Ovale Closure: A Comprehensive Review.
The patent foramen ovale (PFO), present in 25% of the population, can cause paradoxical embolism and stroke. Transcatheter PFO closure is the gold standard for recurrent embolism with significant inter-atrial shunting, with recent trials confirming its superiority in reducing ischemic stroke recurrence over medical therapy. However, device-related thrombosis remains a concern, posing risks of systemic embolism and neurological events. Optimal post-closure antithrombotic management, including the choice and duration of therapy, remains unclear. Recommendations suggest transient dual antiplatelet therapy followed by long-term single therapy, but robust evidence is lacking, especially regarding device neo-endothelization timelines. Current studies often lack long-term follow-up, leaving gaps in understanding the incidence and prevention of thrombosis. Future research is crucial to provide evidence-based guidance and refine personalized treatment strategies for better outcomes.