精神疾病中脑功能的谷氨酸能调节:神经影像学研究的系统综述。

IF 4.8
Ioana Varvari, Lara Bolte, Chiara Colli, Valentina Mancini, Matthew M Nour, Philip McGuire, Robert A McCutcheon
{"title":"精神疾病中脑功能的谷氨酸能调节:神经影像学研究的系统综述。","authors":"Ioana Varvari, Lara Bolte, Chiara Colli, Valentina Mancini, Matthew M Nour, Philip McGuire, Robert A McCutcheon","doi":"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.07.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aberrant dopamine and glutamate signalling are implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Existing treatments primarily target dopamine pathways underlying positive symptoms but have relatively little effect on cognitive and negative symptoms. Glutamatergic modulators may treat the latter symptom domains, and neuroimaging studies have the potential to identify therapeutic mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review to examine functional neuroimaging studies of glutamatergic modulators in psychosis, and determine whether these agents alter brain activity, chemistry, or functional connectivity, and if such changes map onto clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024549120), Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to June 2024 for studies administering pharmacologic glutamate modulators to individuals with psychosis, employing functional neuroimaging (1H-MRS, fMRI, ASL, PET, EEG, or MEG). Twenty-seven articles met inclusion criteria, encompassing 841 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence from <sup>1</sup>H-MRS suggests that sarcosine, N-Acetylcysteine, and Riluzole reduce glutamate concentrations in frontal and hippocampal regions, but no clinical outcomes investigated. Resting-state and task-based fMRI studies suggest that NMDAR modulators may normalise measures of functional dysconnectivity, though effects were often short-lived and did not always correspond to sustained symptom improvements. Similarly, EEG studies consistently identified normalisation of mismatch negativity and gamma oscillations, but correlations with symptom or cognitive outcomes were inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While glutamatergic modulators show measurable effects on brain chemistry and electrophysiology, the relationship to robust, durable clinical benefits remains elusive. Future work should employ larger, longer duration, and multimodal imaging studies to clarify the precise mechanisms, optimal dosing, and patient subgroups most likely to benefit from glutamatergic interventions in psychosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":93900,"journal":{"name":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Glutamatergic modulation of brain function in psychosis: A systematic review of neuroimaging studies.\",\"authors\":\"Ioana Varvari, Lara Bolte, Chiara Colli, Valentina Mancini, Matthew M Nour, Philip McGuire, Robert A McCutcheon\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.07.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aberrant dopamine and glutamate signalling are implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Existing treatments primarily target dopamine pathways underlying positive symptoms but have relatively little effect on cognitive and negative symptoms. Glutamatergic modulators may treat the latter symptom domains, and neuroimaging studies have the potential to identify therapeutic mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review to examine functional neuroimaging studies of glutamatergic modulators in psychosis, and determine whether these agents alter brain activity, chemistry, or functional connectivity, and if such changes map onto clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024549120), Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to June 2024 for studies administering pharmacologic glutamate modulators to individuals with psychosis, employing functional neuroimaging (1H-MRS, fMRI, ASL, PET, EEG, or MEG). Twenty-seven articles met inclusion criteria, encompassing 841 participants.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Evidence from <sup>1</sup>H-MRS suggests that sarcosine, N-Acetylcysteine, and Riluzole reduce glutamate concentrations in frontal and hippocampal regions, but no clinical outcomes investigated. Resting-state and task-based fMRI studies suggest that NMDAR modulators may normalise measures of functional dysconnectivity, though effects were often short-lived and did not always correspond to sustained symptom improvements. Similarly, EEG studies consistently identified normalisation of mismatch negativity and gamma oscillations, but correlations with symptom or cognitive outcomes were inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While glutamatergic modulators show measurable effects on brain chemistry and electrophysiology, the relationship to robust, durable clinical benefits remains elusive. Future work should employ larger, longer duration, and multimodal imaging studies to clarify the precise mechanisms, optimal dosing, and patient subgroups most likely to benefit from glutamatergic interventions in psychosis.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":93900,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.07.004\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.07.004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:异常的多巴胺和谷氨酸信号与精神分裂症的病理生理有关。现有的治疗主要针对潜在阳性症状的多巴胺通路,但对认知和阴性症状的影响相对较小。谷氨酸能调节剂可以治疗后一种症状域,神经影像学研究有可能确定治疗机制。我们进行了一项系统综述,以检查谷氨酸能调节剂在精神病中的功能神经影像学研究,并确定这些药物是否会改变大脑活动、化学或功能连接,以及这些变化是否与临床结果相关。方法:遵循PRISMA指南(PROSPERO: CRD42024549120),检索Medline、Embase和PsycINFO,从成立到2024年6月,使用功能神经影像学(1H-MRS、fMRI、ASL、PET、EEG或MEG)对精神病患者使用谷氨酸调剂的研究。27篇文章符合纳入标准,共841名受试者。结果:1H-MRS证据表明,肌氨酸、n -乙酰半胱氨酸和利鲁唑可降低额叶和海马区的谷氨酸浓度,但未研究临床结果。静息状态和基于任务的fMRI研究表明,NMDAR调节剂可能使功能连接障碍的测量正常化,尽管效果通常是短暂的,并不总是与持续的症状改善相对应。同样,脑电图研究一致地确定了错配负性和伽马振荡的正常化,但与症状或认知结果的相关性不一致。结论:虽然谷氨酸能调节剂对脑化学和电生理有可测量的影响,但与持久的临床益处的关系仍然难以捉摸。未来的工作应该采用更大、更长的持续时间和多模态成像研究,以阐明确切的机制、最佳剂量和最有可能从精神疾病的谷氨酸能干预中受益的患者亚组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Glutamatergic modulation of brain function in psychosis: A systematic review of neuroimaging studies.

Background: Aberrant dopamine and glutamate signalling are implicated in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Existing treatments primarily target dopamine pathways underlying positive symptoms but have relatively little effect on cognitive and negative symptoms. Glutamatergic modulators may treat the latter symptom domains, and neuroimaging studies have the potential to identify therapeutic mechanisms. We conducted a systematic review to examine functional neuroimaging studies of glutamatergic modulators in psychosis, and determine whether these agents alter brain activity, chemistry, or functional connectivity, and if such changes map onto clinical outcomes.

Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO: CRD42024549120), Medline, Embase, and PsycINFO were searched from inception to June 2024 for studies administering pharmacologic glutamate modulators to individuals with psychosis, employing functional neuroimaging (1H-MRS, fMRI, ASL, PET, EEG, or MEG). Twenty-seven articles met inclusion criteria, encompassing 841 participants.

Results: Evidence from 1H-MRS suggests that sarcosine, N-Acetylcysteine, and Riluzole reduce glutamate concentrations in frontal and hippocampal regions, but no clinical outcomes investigated. Resting-state and task-based fMRI studies suggest that NMDAR modulators may normalise measures of functional dysconnectivity, though effects were often short-lived and did not always correspond to sustained symptom improvements. Similarly, EEG studies consistently identified normalisation of mismatch negativity and gamma oscillations, but correlations with symptom or cognitive outcomes were inconsistent.

Conclusions: While glutamatergic modulators show measurable effects on brain chemistry and electrophysiology, the relationship to robust, durable clinical benefits remains elusive. Future work should employ larger, longer duration, and multimodal imaging studies to clarify the precise mechanisms, optimal dosing, and patient subgroups most likely to benefit from glutamatergic interventions in psychosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信