数字健康干预对心力衰竭门诊患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。

IF 4.4 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
European heart journal. Digital health Pub Date : 2025-06-10 eCollection Date: 2025-07-01 DOI:10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf063
David O Arnar, Bartosz Dobies, Elias F Gudmundsson, Heida B Bragadottir, Gudbjorg Jona Gudlaugsdottir, Audur Ketilsdottir, Hallveig Broddadottir, Brynja Laxdal, Thordis Jona Hrafnkelsdottir, Inga J Ingimarsdottir, Bylgja Kaernested, Axel F Sigurdsson, Ari Isberg, Svala Sigurdardottir, Tryggvi Thorgeirsson, Saemundur J Oddsson
{"title":"数字健康干预对心力衰竭门诊患者的影响:一项随机对照试验。","authors":"David O Arnar, Bartosz Dobies, Elias F Gudmundsson, Heida B Bragadottir, Gudbjorg Jona Gudlaugsdottir, Audur Ketilsdottir, Hallveig Broddadottir, Brynja Laxdal, Thordis Jona Hrafnkelsdottir, Inga J Ingimarsdottir, Bylgja Kaernested, Axel F Sigurdsson, Ari Isberg, Svala Sigurdardottir, Tryggvi Thorgeirsson, Saemundur J Oddsson","doi":"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is associated with high mortality and reduced quality of life (QoL). Interventions encouraging a healthy lifestyle and self-care can reduce morbidity and HF-related hospitalizations. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the impact of a digital health programme on QoL and clinical outcomes of patients. The programme included remote patient monitoring (RPM), self-care, HF education, and empowered positive lifestyle changes.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients (<i>n</i> = 175) received standard-of-care (SoC) at a HF outpatient clinic (control, <i>n</i> = 89) or SoC plus a digital health programme (intervention, <i>n</i> = 86) for 6 months, followed by a 6-month maintenance period. Compliance with RPM was 93% at 6 months. No significant between-group difference was found in the primary endpoint (health-related QoL), except in an exploratory subgroup of New York Heart Association class III patients, where the intervention group had a significantly smaller QoL decline (<i>P</i> = 0.023). For secondary endpoints, the intervention group had significantly greater improvements in self-care at 6 months (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and 12 months (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and in disease-specific knowledge at 12 months (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Several exploratory endpoints favoured the intervention, with significant improvements in triglycerides (<i>P</i> = 0.012), HbA1c (<i>P</i> = 0.014), and fasting glucose (<i>P</i> = 0.010). The TG/HDL cholesterol ratio and TG/glucose index improved significantly at both 6 and 12 months in between-group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the digital programme did not improve health-related QoL, it led to benefits in other important outcomes such as self-care, disease-specific knowledge, and several key metabolic parameters.</p>","PeriodicalId":72965,"journal":{"name":"European heart journal. Digital health","volume":"6 4","pages":"749-762"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12282350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of a digital health intervention on outpatients with heart failure: a randomized, controlled trial.\",\"authors\":\"David O Arnar, Bartosz Dobies, Elias F Gudmundsson, Heida B Bragadottir, Gudbjorg Jona Gudlaugsdottir, Audur Ketilsdottir, Hallveig Broddadottir, Brynja Laxdal, Thordis Jona Hrafnkelsdottir, Inga J Ingimarsdottir, Bylgja Kaernested, Axel F Sigurdsson, Ari Isberg, Svala Sigurdardottir, Tryggvi Thorgeirsson, Saemundur J Oddsson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf063\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>Heart failure (HF) is associated with high mortality and reduced quality of life (QoL). Interventions encouraging a healthy lifestyle and self-care can reduce morbidity and HF-related hospitalizations. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the impact of a digital health programme on QoL and clinical outcomes of patients. The programme included remote patient monitoring (RPM), self-care, HF education, and empowered positive lifestyle changes.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Patients (<i>n</i> = 175) received standard-of-care (SoC) at a HF outpatient clinic (control, <i>n</i> = 89) or SoC plus a digital health programme (intervention, <i>n</i> = 86) for 6 months, followed by a 6-month maintenance period. Compliance with RPM was 93% at 6 months. No significant between-group difference was found in the primary endpoint (health-related QoL), except in an exploratory subgroup of New York Heart Association class III patients, where the intervention group had a significantly smaller QoL decline (<i>P</i> = 0.023). For secondary endpoints, the intervention group had significantly greater improvements in self-care at 6 months (<i>P</i> < 0.001) and 12 months (<i>P</i> = 0.003), and in disease-specific knowledge at 12 months (<i>P</i> = 0.001). Several exploratory endpoints favoured the intervention, with significant improvements in triglycerides (<i>P</i> = 0.012), HbA1c (<i>P</i> = 0.014), and fasting glucose (<i>P</i> = 0.010). The TG/HDL cholesterol ratio and TG/glucose index improved significantly at both 6 and 12 months in between-group comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although the digital programme did not improve health-related QoL, it led to benefits in other important outcomes such as self-care, disease-specific knowledge, and several key metabolic parameters.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72965,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"volume\":\"6 4\",\"pages\":\"749-762\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12282350/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European heart journal. Digital health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf063\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2025/7/1 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"eCollection\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European heart journal. Digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjdh/ztaf063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:心力衰竭(HF)与高死亡率和低生活质量(QoL)相关。鼓励健康生活方式和自我保健的干预措施可以减少发病率和与hf相关的住院治疗。我们进行了一项随机对照试验(RCT),以评估数字健康计划对患者生活质量和临床结果的影响。该计划包括远程患者监测(RPM)、自我保健、心衰教育和积极的生活方式改变。方法和结果:患者(n = 175)在HF门诊接受标准护理(SoC)(对照组,n = 89)或SoC加数字健康计划(干预,n = 86),为期6个月,随后是6个月的维持期。6个月时,RPM的依从性为93%。除了纽约心脏协会III类患者的探索性亚组外,主要终点(与健康相关的生活质量)组间无显著差异,干预组的生活质量下降明显较小(P = 0.023)。对于次要终点,干预组在6个月(P < 0.001)和12个月(P = 0.003)时的自我保健以及12个月时的疾病特异性知识方面有显著更大的改善(P = 0.001)。几个探索性终点支持该干预措施,甘油三酯(P = 0.012)、糖化血红蛋白(P = 0.014)和空腹血糖(P = 0.010)均有显著改善。在6个月和12个月时,组间比较TG/HDL胆固醇比率和TG/葡萄糖指数均有显著改善。结论:尽管数字方案没有改善与健康相关的生活质量,但它在其他重要结果(如自我保健、疾病特异性知识和几个关键代谢参数)方面带来了益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Effect of a digital health intervention on outpatients with heart failure: a randomized, controlled trial.

Effect of a digital health intervention on outpatients with heart failure: a randomized, controlled trial.

Effect of a digital health intervention on outpatients with heart failure: a randomized, controlled trial.

Effect of a digital health intervention on outpatients with heart failure: a randomized, controlled trial.

Aims: Heart failure (HF) is associated with high mortality and reduced quality of life (QoL). Interventions encouraging a healthy lifestyle and self-care can reduce morbidity and HF-related hospitalizations. We conducted a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess the impact of a digital health programme on QoL and clinical outcomes of patients. The programme included remote patient monitoring (RPM), self-care, HF education, and empowered positive lifestyle changes.

Methods and results: Patients (n = 175) received standard-of-care (SoC) at a HF outpatient clinic (control, n = 89) or SoC plus a digital health programme (intervention, n = 86) for 6 months, followed by a 6-month maintenance period. Compliance with RPM was 93% at 6 months. No significant between-group difference was found in the primary endpoint (health-related QoL), except in an exploratory subgroup of New York Heart Association class III patients, where the intervention group had a significantly smaller QoL decline (P = 0.023). For secondary endpoints, the intervention group had significantly greater improvements in self-care at 6 months (P < 0.001) and 12 months (P = 0.003), and in disease-specific knowledge at 12 months (P = 0.001). Several exploratory endpoints favoured the intervention, with significant improvements in triglycerides (P = 0.012), HbA1c (P = 0.014), and fasting glucose (P = 0.010). The TG/HDL cholesterol ratio and TG/glucose index improved significantly at both 6 and 12 months in between-group comparisons.

Conclusion: Although the digital programme did not improve health-related QoL, it led to benefits in other important outcomes such as self-care, disease-specific knowledge, and several key metabolic parameters.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信