María Camila Pinzón-Díaz, Oswal Martínez-Moreno, Natalia Marcela Castellanos-Gómez, Viviana Cardona-Posada, Frank Florez-Montes, Johnatan Vallejo-Cardona, Luis Carlos Correa-Ortiz
{"title":"技术与助听器之外的听觉康复:探索性系统综述。","authors":"María Camila Pinzón-Díaz, Oswal Martínez-Moreno, Natalia Marcela Castellanos-Gómez, Viviana Cardona-Posada, Frank Florez-Montes, Johnatan Vallejo-Cardona, Luis Carlos Correa-Ortiz","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Traditionally, auditory rehabilitation in people with hearing loss has sought training in auditory skills to achieve an understanding of sound messages for communication. Assistive or supportive technology is limited to hearing aids that transmit sound through the air or bone to be used by the individual, and only in recent times have technologies for rehabilitation, of high cost and difficult access, begun to be used, employed by audiology professionals. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study was to compile the evidence reported in the literature on the use of technology in auditory rehabilitation for the improvement of hearing skills in people with hearing loss, beyond hearing aids and cochlear implants. <b>Method:</b> A systematic review of the literature was conducted between 2018 and 2024 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using as search terms Technology AND \"Auditory Rehabilitation\" validated in DeCS and MeSH thesauri; the PICO method was used to propose the research question, and the PRISMA strategy was used for the inclusion or exclusion of the articles to be reviewed. <b>Results:</b> In the first search, 141 documents were obtained. Subsequently, inclusion criteria, such as development with vibrotactile stimulation, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), among others, and exclusion criteria, such as those related to cochlear implants and air conduction hearing aids, were applied, and finally, articles related to natural language processing, and other systematic reviews were excluded so that the database was reduced to 14 documents. To this set, due to their relevance, two papers were added, for a total of sixteen analyzed. <b>Conclusions:</b> There are solutions ranging from the use of smartphones for telehealth to solutions with multiple technologies, such as the development of virtual environments with vibrotactile feedback. Hearing-impaired people and even professionals in this area of healthcare have a high level of acceptance of the use of technology in rehabilitation. Finally, this article highlights the crucial role of technology in auditory rehabilitation, with solutions that improve hearing skills and the positive acceptance of these tools by patients and audiology professionals.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12285927/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Technologies and Auditory Rehabilitation Beyond Hearing Aids: An Exploratory Systematic Review.\",\"authors\":\"María Camila Pinzón-Díaz, Oswal Martínez-Moreno, Natalia Marcela Castellanos-Gómez, Viviana Cardona-Posada, Frank Florez-Montes, Johnatan Vallejo-Cardona, Luis Carlos Correa-Ortiz\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/audiolres15040080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Traditionally, auditory rehabilitation in people with hearing loss has sought training in auditory skills to achieve an understanding of sound messages for communication. Assistive or supportive technology is limited to hearing aids that transmit sound through the air or bone to be used by the individual, and only in recent times have technologies for rehabilitation, of high cost and difficult access, begun to be used, employed by audiology professionals. <b>Objective:</b> The objective of this study was to compile the evidence reported in the literature on the use of technology in auditory rehabilitation for the improvement of hearing skills in people with hearing loss, beyond hearing aids and cochlear implants. <b>Method:</b> A systematic review of the literature was conducted between 2018 and 2024 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using as search terms Technology AND \\\"Auditory Rehabilitation\\\" validated in DeCS and MeSH thesauri; the PICO method was used to propose the research question, and the PRISMA strategy was used for the inclusion or exclusion of the articles to be reviewed. <b>Results:</b> In the first search, 141 documents were obtained. Subsequently, inclusion criteria, such as development with vibrotactile stimulation, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), among others, and exclusion criteria, such as those related to cochlear implants and air conduction hearing aids, were applied, and finally, articles related to natural language processing, and other systematic reviews were excluded so that the database was reduced to 14 documents. To this set, due to their relevance, two papers were added, for a total of sixteen analyzed. <b>Conclusions:</b> There are solutions ranging from the use of smartphones for telehealth to solutions with multiple technologies, such as the development of virtual environments with vibrotactile feedback. Hearing-impaired people and even professionals in this area of healthcare have a high level of acceptance of the use of technology in rehabilitation. Finally, this article highlights the crucial role of technology in auditory rehabilitation, with solutions that improve hearing skills and the positive acceptance of these tools by patients and audiology professionals.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology Research\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12285927/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15040080\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15040080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
背景:传统上,听力损失患者的听觉康复一直在寻求听觉技能的训练,以实现对声音信息的理解。辅助或支持技术仅限于通过空气或骨骼传播声音供个人使用的助听器,直到最近才开始使用昂贵且难以获得的康复技术,由听力学专业人员使用。目的:本研究的目的是整理除助听器和人工耳蜗外,在听力康复中使用技术来改善听力损失患者听力技能的文献报道。方法:系统检索2018 - 2024年PubMed、Scopus和Web of Science数据库的相关文献,检索词为Technology和听觉康复(Auditory Rehabilitation),检索词为DeCS和MeSH叙词表;采用PICO方法提出研究问题,采用PRISMA策略纳入或排除待综述文章。结果:第一次检索得到文献141篇。随后,纳入标准,如振动触觉刺激的发展,信息和通信技术(ict)等,以及排除标准,如与人工耳蜗和空气传导助听器相关的标准,最后,与自然语言处理相关的文章,以及其他系统评价被排除在外,使数据库减少到14篇。在这一组中,由于它们的相关性,增加了两篇论文,总共分析了16篇。结论:有多种解决方案,从使用智能手机进行远程医疗到采用多种技术的解决方案,如开发具有振动触觉反馈的虚拟环境。听力受损的人,甚至是这一医疗保健领域的专业人员,对在康复中使用技术的接受程度很高。最后,本文强调了技术在听觉康复中的关键作用,以及提高听力技能的解决方案,以及患者和听力学专业人员对这些工具的积极接受。
Technologies and Auditory Rehabilitation Beyond Hearing Aids: An Exploratory Systematic Review.
Background: Traditionally, auditory rehabilitation in people with hearing loss has sought training in auditory skills to achieve an understanding of sound messages for communication. Assistive or supportive technology is limited to hearing aids that transmit sound through the air or bone to be used by the individual, and only in recent times have technologies for rehabilitation, of high cost and difficult access, begun to be used, employed by audiology professionals. Objective: The objective of this study was to compile the evidence reported in the literature on the use of technology in auditory rehabilitation for the improvement of hearing skills in people with hearing loss, beyond hearing aids and cochlear implants. Method: A systematic review of the literature was conducted between 2018 and 2024 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, using as search terms Technology AND "Auditory Rehabilitation" validated in DeCS and MeSH thesauri; the PICO method was used to propose the research question, and the PRISMA strategy was used for the inclusion or exclusion of the articles to be reviewed. Results: In the first search, 141 documents were obtained. Subsequently, inclusion criteria, such as development with vibrotactile stimulation, Information and Communication Technologies (ICTs), among others, and exclusion criteria, such as those related to cochlear implants and air conduction hearing aids, were applied, and finally, articles related to natural language processing, and other systematic reviews were excluded so that the database was reduced to 14 documents. To this set, due to their relevance, two papers were added, for a total of sixteen analyzed. Conclusions: There are solutions ranging from the use of smartphones for telehealth to solutions with multiple technologies, such as the development of virtual environments with vibrotactile feedback. Hearing-impaired people and even professionals in this area of healthcare have a high level of acceptance of the use of technology in rehabilitation. Finally, this article highlights the crucial role of technology in auditory rehabilitation, with solutions that improve hearing skills and the positive acceptance of these tools by patients and audiology professionals.
期刊介绍:
The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.