评估年轻单侧耳聋患者的听觉定位能力。

IF 1.8 Q1 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY
Alessandro Aruffo, Giovanni Nicoli, Marta Fantoni, Raffaella Marchi, Edoardo Carini, Eva Orzan
{"title":"评估年轻单侧耳聋患者的听觉定位能力。","authors":"Alessandro Aruffo, Giovanni Nicoli, Marta Fantoni, Raffaella Marchi, Edoardo Carini, Eva Orzan","doi":"10.3390/audiolres15040085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Unilateral hearing loss (UHL), particularly single-sided deafness (SSD), disrupts spatial hearing in children, leading to academic and social challenges. This study aimed to (1) compare azimuthal sound-localization accuracy and compensatory strategies between children with single-sided deafness (SSD) and their normal-hearing (NH) peers within a virtual reality environment, and (2) investigate sound-localization performance across various azimuths by contrasting left-SSD (L-SSD) and right-SSD (R-SSD) groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 44 participants (20 NH, 24 SSD) performed sound localization tasks in a 3D virtual environment. Unsigned azimuth error (UAE), unsigned elevation error (UEE), and head movement distance were analyzed across six azimuthal angles (-75° to 75°) at 0°elevation. Non-parametric statistics (Mann-Whitney U tests, Holm-Bonferroni correction) compared performance between NH and SSD groups and within SSD subgroups (L-SSD vs. R-SSD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SSD group exhibited significantly higher UAE (mean: 22.4° vs. 3.69°, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), UEE (mean: 5.95° vs. 3.77°, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and head movement distance (mean: 0.35° vs. 0.12°, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) compared with NH peers, indicating persistent localization deficits and compensatory effort. Within the SSD group, elevation performance was superior to azimuthal accuracy (mean UEE: 3.77° vs. mean UAE: 22.4°). Participants with R-SSD exhibited greater azimuthal errors at rightward angles (45°and 75°) and at -15°, as well as increased elevation errors at 75°. Hemifield-specific advantages were strongest at extreme lateral angles (75°).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with SSD rely on insufficient compensatory head movements to resolve monaural spatial ambiguity in order to localize sounds. Localization deficits and the effort associated with localization task call for action in addressing these issues in dynamic environments such as the classroom. L-SSD subjects outperformed R-SSD peers, highlighting hemispheric specialization in spatial hearing and the need to study its neural basis to develop targeted rehabilitation and classroom support. The hemifield advantages described in this study call for further data collection and research on the topic.</p>","PeriodicalId":44133,"journal":{"name":"Audiology Research","volume":"15 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286218/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Auditory Localization Capabilities in Young Patients with Single-Side Deafness.\",\"authors\":\"Alessandro Aruffo, Giovanni Nicoli, Marta Fantoni, Raffaella Marchi, Edoardo Carini, Eva Orzan\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/audiolres15040085\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background/objectives: </strong>Unilateral hearing loss (UHL), particularly single-sided deafness (SSD), disrupts spatial hearing in children, leading to academic and social challenges. This study aimed to (1) compare azimuthal sound-localization accuracy and compensatory strategies between children with single-sided deafness (SSD) and their normal-hearing (NH) peers within a virtual reality environment, and (2) investigate sound-localization performance across various azimuths by contrasting left-SSD (L-SSD) and right-SSD (R-SSD) groups.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cohort of 44 participants (20 NH, 24 SSD) performed sound localization tasks in a 3D virtual environment. Unsigned azimuth error (UAE), unsigned elevation error (UEE), and head movement distance were analyzed across six azimuthal angles (-75° to 75°) at 0°elevation. Non-parametric statistics (Mann-Whitney U tests, Holm-Bonferroni correction) compared performance between NH and SSD groups and within SSD subgroups (L-SSD vs. R-SSD).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The SSD group exhibited significantly higher UAE (mean: 22.4° vs. 3.69°, <i>p</i> < 0.0001), UEE (mean: 5.95° vs. 3.77°, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) and head movement distance (mean: 0.35° vs. 0.12°, <i>p</i> < 0.0001) compared with NH peers, indicating persistent localization deficits and compensatory effort. Within the SSD group, elevation performance was superior to azimuthal accuracy (mean UEE: 3.77° vs. mean UAE: 22.4°). Participants with R-SSD exhibited greater azimuthal errors at rightward angles (45°and 75°) and at -15°, as well as increased elevation errors at 75°. Hemifield-specific advantages were strongest at extreme lateral angles (75°).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Children with SSD rely on insufficient compensatory head movements to resolve monaural spatial ambiguity in order to localize sounds. Localization deficits and the effort associated with localization task call for action in addressing these issues in dynamic environments such as the classroom. L-SSD subjects outperformed R-SSD peers, highlighting hemispheric specialization in spatial hearing and the need to study its neural basis to develop targeted rehabilitation and classroom support. The hemifield advantages described in this study call for further data collection and research on the topic.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":44133,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Audiology Research\",\"volume\":\"15 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12286218/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Audiology Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15040085\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Audiology Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/audiolres15040085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:单侧听力损失(UHL),特别是单侧耳聋(SSD),会破坏儿童的空间听力,导致学业和社会挑战。本研究旨在(1)在虚拟现实环境中比较单侧耳聋(SSD)儿童和正常听力儿童(NH)的方位角声音定位精度和补偿策略;(2)通过左、右两组对比研究不同方位角的声音定位性能。方法:44名参与者(20名NH, 24名SSD)在3D虚拟环境中进行声音定位任务。无符号方位角误差(UAE)、无符号仰角误差(UEE)和头部运动距离在0°仰角的6个方位角(-75°到75°)上进行了分析。非参数统计(Mann-Whitney U检验,Holm-Bonferroni校正)比较了NH组和SSD组之间以及SSD子组内(L-SSD vs. R-SSD)的性能。结果:与NH组相比,SSD组表现出明显更高的UAE(平均:22.4°vs. 3.69°,p < 0.0001), UEE(平均:5.95°vs. 3.77°,p < 0.0001)和头部运动距离(平均:0.35°vs. 0.12°,p < 0.0001),表明持续的定位缺陷和代偿性努力。在SSD组中,仰角性能优于方位角精度(平均UEE: 3.77°,平均UAE: 22.4°)。患有R-SSD的参与者在直角(45°和75°)和-15°时表现出更大的方位角误差,以及在75°时增加的仰角误差。半场特异性优势在极端侧角(75°)时最强。结论:SSD患儿依靠不充分的补偿性头部运动来解决单音空间模糊,从而定位声音。本地化缺陷和与本地化任务相关的努力要求在课堂等动态环境中解决这些问题。L-SSD的受试者表现优于R-SSD的同龄人,这突出了空间听力的半球特化,以及研究其神经基础以制定有针对性的康复和课堂支持的必要性。本研究中描述的半场优势需要进一步的数据收集和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Evaluating Auditory Localization Capabilities in Young Patients with Single-Side Deafness.

Evaluating Auditory Localization Capabilities in Young Patients with Single-Side Deafness.

Evaluating Auditory Localization Capabilities in Young Patients with Single-Side Deafness.

Evaluating Auditory Localization Capabilities in Young Patients with Single-Side Deafness.

Background/objectives: Unilateral hearing loss (UHL), particularly single-sided deafness (SSD), disrupts spatial hearing in children, leading to academic and social challenges. This study aimed to (1) compare azimuthal sound-localization accuracy and compensatory strategies between children with single-sided deafness (SSD) and their normal-hearing (NH) peers within a virtual reality environment, and (2) investigate sound-localization performance across various azimuths by contrasting left-SSD (L-SSD) and right-SSD (R-SSD) groups.

Methods: A cohort of 44 participants (20 NH, 24 SSD) performed sound localization tasks in a 3D virtual environment. Unsigned azimuth error (UAE), unsigned elevation error (UEE), and head movement distance were analyzed across six azimuthal angles (-75° to 75°) at 0°elevation. Non-parametric statistics (Mann-Whitney U tests, Holm-Bonferroni correction) compared performance between NH and SSD groups and within SSD subgroups (L-SSD vs. R-SSD).

Results: The SSD group exhibited significantly higher UAE (mean: 22.4° vs. 3.69°, p < 0.0001), UEE (mean: 5.95° vs. 3.77°, p < 0.0001) and head movement distance (mean: 0.35° vs. 0.12°, p < 0.0001) compared with NH peers, indicating persistent localization deficits and compensatory effort. Within the SSD group, elevation performance was superior to azimuthal accuracy (mean UEE: 3.77° vs. mean UAE: 22.4°). Participants with R-SSD exhibited greater azimuthal errors at rightward angles (45°and 75°) and at -15°, as well as increased elevation errors at 75°. Hemifield-specific advantages were strongest at extreme lateral angles (75°).

Conclusions: Children with SSD rely on insufficient compensatory head movements to resolve monaural spatial ambiguity in order to localize sounds. Localization deficits and the effort associated with localization task call for action in addressing these issues in dynamic environments such as the classroom. L-SSD subjects outperformed R-SSD peers, highlighting hemispheric specialization in spatial hearing and the need to study its neural basis to develop targeted rehabilitation and classroom support. The hemifield advantages described in this study call for further data collection and research on the topic.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Audiology Research
Audiology Research AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
23.50%
发文量
56
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊介绍: The mission of Audiology Research is to publish contemporary, ethical, clinically relevant scientific researches related to the basic science and clinical aspects of the auditory and vestibular system and diseases of the ear that can be used by clinicians, scientists and specialists to improve understanding and treatment of patients with audiological and neurotological disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信