{"title":"腹腔镜手术中排烟方法技术综述。","authors":"Jianlu Zhang, Ziqi Zhou, Wai San Ho, Qiaofei Liu, Feng Tian, Junchao Guo","doi":"10.1007/s00595-025-03107-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The surgical smoke generated in laparoendoscopic surgery compromises visual clarity and poses health hazards to the operating team. While numerous strategies to maintain a clear surgical field and mitigate these risks have been developed, existing research remains fragmented. This lack of systematic evidence of effective solutions creates challenges in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted this study to evaluate the effectiveness of current smoke evacuation methods aimed at maintaining surgical field visibility and mitigating occupational hazards during laparoendoscopic procedures. The analysis synthesizes literature retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases, with all included studies published up until January, 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 techniques were categorized systematically into four distinct approaches: active instrument-tip suction, port-side evacuation, valveless trocar systems, and continuous suction for gasless laparoendoscopy. Each category exhibits unique operational mechanisms, advantages, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple solutions exist for surgical smoke management in laparoendoscopic procedures, but their future development should prioritize creating more efficient, user-friendly, and safer evacuation technologies that will account for global healthcare resource disparities to ensure broad clinical applicability.</p>","PeriodicalId":22163,"journal":{"name":"Surgery Today","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methods used for smoke evacuation in laparoendoscopic surgery: a technical review.\",\"authors\":\"Jianlu Zhang, Ziqi Zhou, Wai San Ho, Qiaofei Liu, Feng Tian, Junchao Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s00595-025-03107-w\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The surgical smoke generated in laparoendoscopic surgery compromises visual clarity and poses health hazards to the operating team. While numerous strategies to maintain a clear surgical field and mitigate these risks have been developed, existing research remains fragmented. This lack of systematic evidence of effective solutions creates challenges in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted this study to evaluate the effectiveness of current smoke evacuation methods aimed at maintaining surgical field visibility and mitigating occupational hazards during laparoendoscopic procedures. The analysis synthesizes literature retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases, with all included studies published up until January, 2025.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 techniques were categorized systematically into four distinct approaches: active instrument-tip suction, port-side evacuation, valveless trocar systems, and continuous suction for gasless laparoendoscopy. Each category exhibits unique operational mechanisms, advantages, and limitations.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Multiple solutions exist for surgical smoke management in laparoendoscopic procedures, but their future development should prioritize creating more efficient, user-friendly, and safer evacuation technologies that will account for global healthcare resource disparities to ensure broad clinical applicability.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgery Today\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgery Today\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03107-w\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery Today","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-025-03107-w","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Methods used for smoke evacuation in laparoendoscopic surgery: a technical review.
Purpose: The surgical smoke generated in laparoendoscopic surgery compromises visual clarity and poses health hazards to the operating team. While numerous strategies to maintain a clear surgical field and mitigate these risks have been developed, existing research remains fragmented. This lack of systematic evidence of effective solutions creates challenges in clinical practice.
Methods: We conducted this study to evaluate the effectiveness of current smoke evacuation methods aimed at maintaining surgical field visibility and mitigating occupational hazards during laparoendoscopic procedures. The analysis synthesizes literature retrieved from PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library databases, with all included studies published up until January, 2025.
Results: A total of 19 techniques were categorized systematically into four distinct approaches: active instrument-tip suction, port-side evacuation, valveless trocar systems, and continuous suction for gasless laparoendoscopy. Each category exhibits unique operational mechanisms, advantages, and limitations.
Conclusions: Multiple solutions exist for surgical smoke management in laparoendoscopic procedures, but their future development should prioritize creating more efficient, user-friendly, and safer evacuation technologies that will account for global healthcare resource disparities to ensure broad clinical applicability.
期刊介绍:
Surgery Today is the official journal of the Japan Surgical Society. The main purpose of the journal is to provide a place for the publication of high-quality papers documenting recent advances and new developments in all fields of surgery, both clinical and experimental. The journal welcomes original papers, review articles, and short communications, as well as short technical reports("How to do it").
The "How to do it" section will includes short articles on methods or techniques recommended for practical surgery. Papers submitted to the journal are reviewed by an international editorial board. Field of interest: All fields of surgery.